Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Necessary Conditions for Morally Responsible Animal Research

Abstract:
Abstract:

In this article, we present three necessary conditions for morally responsible animal research that we believe people on both sides of this debate can accept. Specifically, we argue that, even if human beings have higher moral status than nonhuman animals, animal research is morally permissible only if it satisfies (1) an expectation of sufficient net benefit, (2) a worthwhile-life condition, and (3) a no-unnecessary-harm/qualified-basic-needs condition. We then claim that, whether or not these necessary conditions are jointly sufficient for justified animal research, they are relatively demanding, with the consequence that many animal experiments may fail to satisfy them.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D DeGrazia . What is suffering and what kinds of being can suffer? In R Green and N Palpant , eds. Suffering in Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014:134–53.

B Brody . Defending animal research: An international perspective. In: J Garrett , ed. The Ethics of Animal Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012:5366.

P Carruthers . The Animals Issue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.

H LaFollette . Animal experimentation in biomedical research. In: TB Beauchamp , RG Frey , eds. The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011:796825.

A Rowan . Debating the value of animal research. In: J Garrett , ed. The Ethics of Animal Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012:197214.

R Bass . Lives in the balance: Utilitarianism and animal research. In: J Garrett , ed. The Ethics of Animal Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012:81105.

M Engel . The commonsense case against animal experimentation. In: J Garrett , ed. The Ethics of Animal Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012:215–36.

A Akhtar . Animals and Public Health. New York: Palgrave; 2012:chap. 6.

D DeGrazia . The harm of death, time-relative interests, and abortion. Philosophical Forum 2007;38:5780

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • ISSN: 0963-1801
  • EISSN: 1469-2147
  • URL: /core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 129 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 395 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.