Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:43:10.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonconfrontational Rationality or Critical Reasoning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

VILHJÁLMUR ÁRNASON
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rationality and the Genetic Challenge by Matti Häyry is a well-written and thoughtful book about important issues in the contemporary ethical discussion of genetics. The book is well structured around seven practical themes that the author takes to exemplify “the genetic challenge.” He also refers to them as “seven ways of making people better,” which the subtitle of the book already puts into question form: Making People Better? In the first chapter of the book, Häyry introduces these seven themes and he discusses each of them in Chapters 3–9. In the remaining two chapters, 2 and 10, he describes the main normative positions analyzed in the book and clarifies his own methodology and position. He chooses six authors, or three pairs of authors, whom he takes to “represent the three normative doctrines of Western Moral philosophy” (p. 27) in order to demonstrate six “divergent rationalities” or “methods of genethics.” In this way, Häyry both summarizes the main prescriptive positions in contemporary bioethical debate and contrasts them with his own “nonconfrontational notion of rationality,” which aims to show that there is a variety of divergent, not mutually exclusive normative views, the justification of which “depends ultimately on the choice of worldviews, attitudes, and ideas about the foundation of moral worth” (p. 47).

Type
Special Section: Methodology in Philosophical Bioethics
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 228 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Häyry, M.Rationality and the Genetic Challenge: Making People Better? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010. References to this book are placed in parentheses in the text.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Cf. Wilson, BR.Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell; 1970.Google Scholar

3. Winch, P.The Idea of Social Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1958:103.Google Scholar

4. Habermas, J. On the pragmatic, the ethical and the moral employments of practical reason. In: Justification and Application. Cronin, C, trans. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1993:1–18.Google Scholar

5. Anscombe, GEM.Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 1958;33: many reprintsGoogle Scholar.

6. O’Neill, O.Towards Justice and Virtue. A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996:82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. See note 4, Habermas 1993.

8. Weber, M.Economy and Society. Roth, G, Wittich, C, eds. New York: Bedminster Press; 1968:24–6.Google Scholar

9. Häyry quotes Habermas, J.Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Cronin, C, Nicholsen, SW, trans. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1990:65.Google Scholar

10. Cf. Árnason, V.Sensible discussion in bioethics: Reflections on interdisciplinary research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2005;14:322–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

11. Habermas, J.The Future of Human Nature, Rehg, W, Pensky, M, Beister, H, trans. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 2003Google Scholar.

12. See note 11, Habermas 2003:81.

13. See note 11, Habermas 2003:43.

14. See note 11, Habermas 2003:63.

15. See note 11, Habermas 2003:81.

16. See note 11, Habermas 2003:81.

17. Cf. Gadamer, HG. Truth and Method, Barden, G, Cumming, J, trans. New York: The Seabury Press; 1975Google Scholar.

18. Weber, M. Science as vocation. In: Gerth, HH, Wright Mills, C, trans. and eds. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1946:129–56.Google Scholar

19. Cf. Ricoeur, P.Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, Savage, D, trans. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1970:32–6.Google Scholar