Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Lindebaum, Dirk and Raftopoulou, Effi 2014. What Would John Stuart Mill Say? A Utilitarian Perspective on Contemporary Neuroscience Debates in Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics,

    Chandler, Jennifer A. Mogyoros, Alexandra Rubio, Tristana Martin and Racine, Eric 2013. Another Look at the Legal and Ethical Consequences of Pharmacological Memory Dampening: The Case of Sexual Assault. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol. 41, Issue. 4, p. 859.

    Levy, Neil 2013. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.

    Tawa, Jennifer and Murphy, Susan 2013. Psychopharmacological treatment for military posttraumatic stress disorder: An integrative review. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, Vol. 25, Issue. 8, p. 419.

    Mackenzie, Robin 2011. The Neuroethics of Pleasure and Addiction in Public Health Strategies Moving Beyond Harm Reduction: Funding the Creation of Non-Addictive Drugs and Taxonomies of Pleasure. Neuroethics, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 103.

    Castrogiovanni, Paolo Bossini, Letizia Calassi, Sara and Tavanti, Mariola 2009. Il trattamento farmacologico delle conseguenze dell’abuso e del disturbo post-traumatico da stress. Quaderni Italiani di Psichiatria, Vol. 28, Issue. 2, p. 79.

    Levy, Neil 2009. Neuroethics: Ethics and the Sciences of the Mind. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 69.

    Levy, Neil and Clarke, Steve 2008. Neuroethics and psychiatry. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Vol. 21, Issue. 6, p. 568.

    Evers, Kathinka 2007. Towards a philosophy for neuroethics. An informed materialist view of the brain might help to develop theoretical frameworks for applied neuroethics. EMBO reports, Vol. 8, p. S48.

  • Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Volume 16, Issue 2
  • April 2007, pp. 138-146

Perspectives on Memory Manipulation: Using Beta-Blockers to Cure Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2007

The human mind strives to maintain equilibrium between memory and oblivion and rejects irrelevant or disruptive memories. However, extensive amounts of stress hormones released at the time of a traumatic event can give rise to such powerful memory formation that traumatic memories cannot be rejected and do not vanish or diminish with time: Post-traumatic stress disorder may then develop. Recent scientific studies suggest that beta-blockers stopping the action of these stress hormones may reduce the emotional impact of disturbing memories or prevent their consolidation. Using such an intervention could, in principle, help people who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, but the idea of doing so is controversial. I shall here discuss memory manipulation in this perspective.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • ISSN: 0963-1801
  • EISSN: 1469-2147
  • URL: /core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *