Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Pragmatic Convergence and the Epistemology of an Adolescent Neuroethics

  • JOSEPH J. FINS and JUDY ILLES
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

Dr. Fins acknowledges the support of the Jerold B. Katz Foundation to Weill Cornell Medical College and the Consortium for the Advanced Study of Brain Injury (CASBI). Dr. Judy Illes is Canada Research Chair in Neuroethics.

Footnotes
References
Hide All

Notes

1. Moreno, JD. The anniversary of the first neuroethics conference (no, not that one). The Neuroethics Blog. February 6, 2018; available at http://www.theneuroethicsblog.com/2018/02/the-anniversary-of-first-neuroethics.html#more (last accessed 12 Feb 2018).

2. Marcus, SJ. Neuroethics: Mapping the Field. New York: The Dana Press; 2002.

3. Chandler, JA. Neurolaw and neuroethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2018;27(4):590598.

4. Buller, T. The new ethics of neuroethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2018;27(4):558565.

5. Racine, E, Sample, M. Two problematic foundations of neuroethics and pragmatist reconstruction. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2018;27(4):566577.

6. Pavarini, G, Singh, I. Pragmatic neuroethics: Lived experiences as a source of moral knowledge. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2018;27(4):578589.

7. Roskies, A. Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron 2002;35:21–3.

8. Snow, CP. The Two Cultures and The Scientific Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1959.

9. Stein, DJ, Illes, J. Beyond scientism and skepticism: An integrative approach to global mental health. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2015;6:166.

10. Miller, FG, Fins, JJ, Bacchetta, MD. Clinical Pragmatism: John Dewey and clinical ethics. The Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 1996;13(27):2751.

11. Fins, JJ. Neuroethics and disorders of consciousness: A pragmatic approach to neuro-palliative care. In: Laureys, S, Tononi, G, eds. The Neurology of Consciousness, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropathology. Amsterdam: Academic Press-Elsevier; 2008:234–44.

12. Chatelle, C, Thibaut, A, Whyte, J, De Val, MD, Laureys, S, Schnakers, C. Pain issues in disorders of consciousness. Brain Injury 2014;28(9):1202–8.

13. Naro, A, Bramanti, P, Bramanti, A, Calabrò, RS. Assessing pain in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness: Are we heading in the right direction? Conscious Cognition 2017;55:148–55.

14. Fins, JJ, Pohl, BR. Neuro-palliative care and disorders of consciousness. In: Hanks, G, Cherny, NI, Christakis, NA, Fallon, M, Kassa, S, Portenoy, RK, eds. Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine, 5th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015:285–91.

15. Fins, JJ. Rights Come to Mind: Brain Injury, Ethics and the Struggle for Consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2015.

16. Fins, JJ. Brain injury and the civil right we don’t think about. The New York Times. August 24, 2017; available at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/24/opinion/minimally-conscious-brain-civil-rights.html?_r=0 (last accessed 16 Feb 2018).

17. Fins, JJ, Wright, MS. Rights language and disorders of consciousness: A call for advocacy. Brain Injury 2018;32(5):670–4.

18. Fins, JJ. Neuroethics and neurotechnology: Instrumentality and human rights. Epilogue. In: Illes, J, Hossain, S, eds. Neuroethics: Anticipating the Future. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017:601–13.

19. Anderson, J, Mizgalewicz Illes, J. Reviews of functional MRI: The ethical dimensions of methodological critique.PloS One 2012;7(8):e42836.

20. Illes, J, Borgelt, E. Brain imaging: Incidental findings: In practice and in person. Nature Reviews. Neurology 2009;5(12):643–4.

21. Racine, E, Northoff, G, Menon, RS, Kimmelman, J, Illes, J. A Canadian perspective on ethics review and neuroimaging: tensions and solutions. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 2011;38(4):572–9.

22. Wright, MS, Varsava, N, Ramirez, J, Edwards, K, Guevremont, N, Ezer, T, et al. Justice and severe brain injury: Legal remedies for a marginalized population. Florida State University Law Review, in press.

23. Eijkholt, M, Anderson, JA, Illes, J. Picturing neuroscience research through a human rights lens: Imaging first-episode schizophrenic treatment-naive individuals. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2012;35(2):146–52.

24. Fins, JJ, Bacchetta, MD, Miller, FG. Clinical Pragmatism: A method of moral problem solving. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1997;7(2):129–45.

25. Fins, JJ, Miller, FG, Bacchetta, MD. Clinical Pragmatism: Bridging theory and practice. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1998;8(1):3944.

26. Illes, J, Raffin, TA. Neuroethics: An emerging new discipline in the study of brain and cognition. Brain and Cognition 202;50(3):341–4.

27. Fins, JJ. Clinical Pragmatism and the care of brain injured patients: Towards a palliative neuroethics for disorders of consciousness. Progress in Brain Research 2005;150:565–82.

28. Illes, J, Chin, VN. Bridging philosophical and practical implications of incidental findings in brain research. Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics 2008;36(2):298304.

29. Fins, JJ, Dorfman, GS, Pancrazio, JJ. Challenges to deep brain stimulation: A pragmatic response to ethical, fiscal, and regulatory concerns. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2012;1265:8090.

Dr. Fins acknowledges the support of the Jerold B. Katz Foundation to Weill Cornell Medical College and the Consortium for the Advanced Study of Brain Injury (CASBI). Dr. Judy Illes is Canada Research Chair in Neuroethics.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • ISSN: 0963-1801
  • EISSN: 1469-2147
  • URL: /core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed