Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Medicalization of Love: Response to Critics


In 2015, we published an article entitled “The Medicalization of Love,” in which we argued that both good and bad consequences could be expected to follow from love’s medicalization, depending on how the process unfolded. A flurry of commentaries followed; here we offer some preliminary thoughts in reply to the more substantial of the criticisms that were raised. We focus in particular on the nature of love itself as well as the role it plays (or should play) in our lives; we also touch on a number of practical issues concerning the likely effects of any plausible “real-life” love drugs and conclude with a call for careful regulation.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J Savulescu , A Sandberg . Neuroenhancement of love and marriage: The chemicals between us. Neuroethics 2008;1(1):3144.

BD Earp , A Sandberg , J Savulescu . Natural selection, childrearing, and the ethics of marriage (and divorce): Building a case for the neuroenhancement of human relationships. Philosophy & Technology 2012;25(4):561–87.

OA Wudarczyk , BD Earp , A Guastella , J Savulescu . Could intranasal oxytocin be used to enhance relationships? Research imperatives, clinical policy, and ethical considerations. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 2013;26(5):474–84.

BD Earp , OA Wudarczyk , A Sandberg , J Savulescu . If I could just stop loving you: Anti-love biotechnology and the ethics of a chemical breakup. American Journal of Bioethics 2013;13(11):317.

D Robson , BD Earp . A dangerous prescription? New Scientist 2014;221(2956):27–8.

BD Earp , M Hauskeller . Binocularity in bioethics—and beyond. American Journal of Bioethics 2016;16(2):W3W6.

N Emmerich . Limitations in the bioethical analysis of medicalisation: The case of love drugs. Social Theory & Health 2016;14(1):109–28.

G Werner . The many faces of neuroreductionism. In: E Başar , ed. Dynamics of Sensory and Cognitive Processing by the Brain. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 1988:241–57.

G Deuschl , C Schade-Brittinger , P Krack , J Volkmann , H Schäfer , K Bötzel , et al. A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2006;355(9):896908.

HS Mayberg , AM Lozano , V Voon , HE McNeely , D Seminowicz , C Hamani , et al. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron 2005;45(5):651–60.

H Wu , PJ Van Dyck-Lippens , R Santegoeds , K van Kuyck , L Gabriëls , G Lin , et al. Deep-brain stimulation for anorexia nervosa. World Neurosurgery 2013;80(3):S29–e1.

A Koivuniemi , K Otto . When “altering brain function” becomes “mind control.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 2014;8(202):16, at 1.

N Levy , T Douglas , G Kahane , S Terbeck , PJ Cowen , M Hewstone , et al. Are you morally modified? The moral effects of widely used pharmaceuticals. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 2014;21(2):111–25, at 123.

K Gupta . Protecting sexual diversity: Rethinking the use of neurotechnological interventions to alter sexuality. AJOB Neuroscience 2012;3(3):24–8.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • ISSN: 0963-1801
  • EISSN: 1469-2147
  • URL: /core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 118 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1015 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 16th September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.