Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Disagreement—Commonality—Autonomy: EU Fundamental Rights in the Internal Market

Abstract
Abstract

The contribution explores the implications of disagreements about rights in the ‘multi-layered’ European polity for the autonomy of EU fundamental rights law. It argues that insomuch as the EU’s weak claim to supra-national political authority is corroborated by a strong case for economic integration, the internal market operates not simply as a constraining factor in the effective realisation of fundamental rights, but provides the very foundation of their autonomous interpretation in the EU legal order. Sections II and III elaborate upon the relationship between conflicts of authority in the European legal space and the autonomous interpretation of EU fundamental rights law under conditions of political disagreement. Section IV links the argument to the often-alleged instrumentalisation of EU fundamental rights in the service of the market. Sections V and VI substantiate the guiding contention of the contribution—that the autonomy of EU fundamental rights law is rooted in the unity of the market—with an analysis of pertinent case law. The concluding section suggests that the transformation of the EU into a ‘genuine’ human rights polity must proceed through a politicisation of the market by virtue of fundamental rights law.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S Douglas-Scott , ‘The European Union and Human Rights after the Treaty of Lisbon’ (2011) 11 Human Rights Law Review 645

J Waldron , ‘A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights’ (1993) 13 OJLS 18

J Waldron , Law and Disagreement (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1999)

D Grimm , ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution?’ (1995) 1 European Law Journal 282

J Habermas , ‘Remarks on Dieter Grimm’s “Does Europe Need a Constitution?”’ (1995) 1 European Law Journal (1995) 303

A Williams , The Ethos of Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010)

G De Búrca , ‘The Road Not Taken: The EU as a Global Human Rights Actor’ (2011) 105 American Journal of International Law 649

N Walker , ‘Human Rights in a Postnational Order: Reconciling Political and Constitutional Pluralism’ in T Campbell , KD Ewing and A Tomkins (eds), Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001) 119

I Pernice , ‘The Treaty of Lisbon and Fundamental Rights: Walter Hallstein-Institut Paper 7/08’ in S Griller and J Ziller (eds), The Lisbon Treaty: EU Constitutionalism without a Constitutional Treaty? (New York, Springer, 2008)

A Torres Pérez , Conflicts of Rights in the European Union (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009)

H Lindahl , ‘The Paradox of Constituent Power: The Ambiguous Self-Constitution of the European Union’, (2007) 20 Ratio Juris 485

J Coppel and A O’Neil , ‘The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?’ (1992) 12 Legal Studies 227, 245

A Hinarejos , ‘Laval and Viking: The Right to Collective Action versus EU Fundamental Freedoms’ (2008) 8 Human Rights Law Review 714, 725

S Besson , ‘The European Union and Human Rights: Towards a Post-National Human Rights Institution?’ (2006) 6 Human Rights Law Review 323

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies
  • ISSN: 1528-8870
  • EISSN: 2049-7636
  • URL: /core/journals/cambridge-yearbook-of-european-legal-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 126 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.