Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-96qlp Total loading time: 0.732 Render date: 2022-12-02T09:34:49.973Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Interactions between Camelina sativa (Brassicaceae) and insect pests of canola

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2014

Juliana Soroka*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
Chrystel Olivier
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
Larry Grenkow
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
Ginette Séguin-Swartz
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
*
1Corresponding author: (e-mail: Julie.Soroka@agr.gc.ca).

Abstract

In an investigation of Camelina sativa (Linnaeus) Crantz (Brassicaceae) and five common insect pests of canola (Brassica napus Linnaeus) (Brassicaceae), little feeding damage to the plant was inflicted by crucifer-feeding specialist flea beetles (Phyllotreta Chevrolat species) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Delia Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) root maggots, or diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)). In choice tests, diamondback moths laid fewer eggs on C. sativa than on B. napus leaves. Diamondback moth larvae consumed less C. sativa leaf tissue, and tended to have a longer developmental period on C. sativa. Larvae of the polyphagous bertha armyworm (Mamestra configurata Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)) had similar feeding levels on C. sativa and B. napus plants. However, there was a longer developmental period from larval to pupal stage and pupae weighed less when fed on C. sativa foliage, suggesting that C. sativa contains antibiosis factors against bertha armyworm. Two strains of aster yellows phytoplasma, 16SrI-A and 16SrI-B, were identified in C. sativa and in Macrosteles quadrilineatus (Forbes) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Differences in incidence of aster yellows and abundance of M. quadrilineatus were observed among lines of C. sativa. The findings confirm that C. sativa is unlikely to support high populations of these insect pests on the Canadian prairies.

Type
Behaviour & Ecology
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2014, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject Editor: Gilles Boiteau

Retired

References

Beirne, B.P. 1956. Leafhoppers (Homoptera; Cicadellidae) of Canada and Alaska. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 88(Supplement S2): 1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berhow, M.A., Polat, U., Glinski, J.A., Glensk, M., Vaughn, S.F., Isbell, T., et al. 2013. Optimized analysis and quantification of glucosinolates from Camelina sativa seeds by reverse-phase liquid chromatography. Industrial Crops and Products, 43: 119125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfield, J.K. and Whitwham, A. 2010. Gap5 – editing the billion fragment sequence assembly. Bioinformatics, 26: 16991703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cárcamo, H.A., Olfert, O.O., Dosdall, L.M., Herle, C.E., Beres, B.L., and Soroka, J.J. 2007. Resistance to cabbage seedpod weevil among selected Brassicaceae germplasm. The Canadian Entomologist, 139: 658669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, F.S. 1988. Biological effects of glucosinolates. In Biologically active natural products. Edited by H.G. Cutler. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, United States of America. Pp. 155181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, J.G. and Frölich, A. 1998. Factors affecting the composition and use of Camelina [online]. The Agricultural and Food Development Authority, Dublin, Ireland. Available from www.teagasc.ie/research/reports/crops/4319/eopr-4319.pdf [accessed 23 July 2013].Google Scholar
Daire, X., Clair, D., Reinert, W., and Boudon-Padieu, E. 1997. Detection and differentiation of grapevine yellows phytoplasmas belonging to the elm yellows group and to the stolbur subgroup by PCR amplification of non-ribosomal DNA. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 103: 507514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, S., Yun, G., Zhang, Q., Xu, H., and Cai, Q. 2004. Effect of false flax (Camelina sativa) on larval feeding and adult behavioural response of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). Acta Entomologica Sinica, 47: 474478.Google Scholar
Dosdall, L.M., Herbut, M.J., and Cowle, N.T. 1994. Susceptibilities of species and cultivars of canola and mustard to infestation by root maggots (Delia spp.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 126: 251260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrensing, D.T. and Guy, S.O. 2008. Camelina. Oilseed crops. Oregon State University Extension Service Bulletin, EM 8953–E: 17.Google Scholar
Finch, S. 1978. Volatile plant chemicals and their effect on host plant finding by the cabbage root fly (Delia brassicae). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 24: 150159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavloski, J., Cárcamo, H., and Dosdall, L. 2011. Insects of canola, mustard, and flax in Canadian grasslands. In Arthropods of Canadian grasslands (volume 2): inhabitants of a changing landscape. Edited by K.D. Floate. Biological Survey of Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. Pp. 181214. doi:10.3752/9780968932155.ch8.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G.C.D. 1993. Cyclorrapha II (Schizophora: Calyptratae) Anthomyiidae. Flies of the Nearctic region. Volume VIII, part 2, number 10. E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Naegele u. Obermiller), Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
Gugel, R.K. and Falk, K.C. 2006. Agronomic and seed quality evaluation of Camelina sativa in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86: 10471058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, K.G.A. 1998. The species of the North American leafhoppers Ceratagallia Kirkaldy and Aceratagallia Kirkaldy (Rhynchota: Homoptera: Cicadellidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 130: 427490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A.E., Hallett, R.H., and Soroka, J.J. 2004. Prefeeding behavior of the crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae, on host and nonhost crucifers. Journal of Insect Behavior, 17: 1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, B.I.F., Lundon, A.R., Prestløkken, E., Abrahamsen, U., and Eltun, R. 2009. Nutrient supply for organic oilseed crops, and quality of potential organic protein feed for ruminants and poultry. Agronomy Research, 7: 592598.Google Scholar
Hopkins, R., Birch, A.N.E., Griffiths, D.W., Baur, R., Stadler, E., and McKinley, R.G. 1997. Leaf surface compounds and oviposition preference of the turnip root fly Delia floralis: the role of glucosinolate and nonglucosinolate compounds. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23: 629643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, R.J., van Dam, N.M., and van Loon, J.J.A. 2009. Role of glucosinolates in insect-plant relationships and multitrophic interactions. Annual Review of Entomology, 54: 5783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IRPCM Phytoplasma/Spiroplasma Working Team – Phytoplasma Taxonomy Group. 2004. Candidatus phytoplasma’, a taxon for the wall-less, non-helical prokaryotes that colonize plant phloem and insects. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 54: 12431255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khadhair, A.H., Tewari, J.P., Howard, R.J., and Paul, V.H. 2001. Detection of aster yellows phytoplasma in false flax based on PCR and RFLP. Microbiological Research, 156: 179184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunkel, L.O. 1926. Studies on aster yellows. American Journal of Botany, 13: 646705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I.-M., Gundersen-Rindal, D.E., Davis, R.E., Bottner, K.D., Marcone, C., and Seemüller, E. 2004. Candidatus phytoplasma asteris’, a novel phytoplasma taxon associated with aster yellows and related diseases. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 54: 10371048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Littel, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stoup, W.W., and Wolfinger, R.D. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. and Tabashnik, B.E. 1987. Visual determination of sex of diamondback moth larvae. The Canadian Entomologist, 129: 585586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinitch, P.E. 1954. Varieties of oil crops [in Russian]. Government Edition of Agricultural Literature, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
Maw, H.E.L., Foottit, R.G., Hamilton, K.G.A., and Scudder, G.G.E. 2000. Checklist of the Hemiptera of Canada and Alaska. National Research Council Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Miller, S.G., Anderson, K., Bassendowski, K.A., Britz, L., Buitenhuis, N., Campbell, E., et al. 2013. Survey of canola diseases in Saskatchewan, 2012. Canadian Plant Disease Survey, 93: 149153.Google Scholar
Muller, R., de Vos, M., Sun, J.Y., Sonderby, I.E., and Halkier, B.A. 2010. Differential effects of indole and aliphatic glucosinolates on lepidopteran herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36: 905913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naranjo, S.E. and Stefanek, M.A. 2012. Feeding behavior of a potential insect pest, Lygus hesperus, on four new industrial crops for the arid southwestern USA. Industrial Crops and Products, 37: 358361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, C.Y., Galka, B., Murza, G., Hegedus, D., Peng, X.M., Séguin-Swartz, G., et al. 2007. Aster yellows disease surveys in Saskatchewan, Canada, 2001–2006. In Proceedings of the 12th GCIRC rapeseed congress, Wuhan, China. Volume 4. Edited by T. Fu and G. Guan. Groupe Consultatif International de Recherche sur le Colza, Paris, France. Pp. 124126.Google Scholar
Olivier, C., Galka, B., and Séguin-Swartz, G. 2010. Detection of aster yellows phytoplasma DNA in seeds and seedlings of canola (Brassica napus and B. rapa) and AY strain identification. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 32: 298305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, C.Y., Lowery, D.T., and Stobbs, L.W. 2009a. Phytoplasma diseases and their relationships with insect and plant hosts in Canadian horticultural and field crops. The Canadian Entomologist, 141: 425462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, C., Séguin-Swartz, G., Galka, B., and Olfert, O. 2011. Aster yellows in leafhoppers and field crops in Saskatchewan, Canada, 2001–2008. The Americas Journal of Plant Sciences and Biotechnology, 141: 425462.Google Scholar
Olivier, C.Y., Séguin-Swartz, G., Gugel, R., and Gossen, B. 2009b. Detection and characterisation of phytoplasma infecting Camelina sativa (false flax) in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 31: 126.Google Scholar
Pachagounder, P., Lamb, R.J., and Bodnaryk, R.P. 1998. Resistance to the flea beetle Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in false flax, Camelina sativa (Brassicaceae). The Canadian Entomologist, 130: 235240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palaniswamy, P., Lamb, R.J., and McVetty, P.B.E. 1992. Screening for antixenosis resistance to flea beetles, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in rapeseed and related crucifers. The Canadian Entomologist, 124: 895906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivnick, K.A., Jarvis, B.J., and Slater, G.P. 1994. Identification of olfactory cues used in host plant finding by diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). The Journal of Chemical Ecology, 20: 14071427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plessers, A.C., McGregor, W.G., Carson, R.B., and Nakoneshny, W. 1962. Species trials with oilseed plants. II. Camelina. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 42: 452459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, J.A.A. and Radke, C.D. 1990. Plant constituents mediating oviposition by the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Phytophaga, 3: 3746.Google Scholar
Roach, S.H. and Hopkins, A.R. 1979. Heliothis spp.: behavior of prepupae and emergence of adults from different soils at different moisture levels. Environmental Entomology, 8: 388391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R.G. 1987. Camelina: a useful research crop and a potential oilseed crop. Minnesota Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin, 579: 112.Google Scholar
Sarfraz, M., Dosdall, L.M., and Keddie, B.A. 2007. Resistance of some cultivated Brassicaceae to infestations by Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 100: 215224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. 2005. SAS/Stat software: version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Schuster, A. and Friedt, W. 1998. Glucosinolate content and composition as parameters of quality of Camelina seed. Industrial Crops and Products, 7: 297302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scottish Rural Colleges. 2013. Camelina: physical requirements [online]. Available from http://www.sruc.ac.uk/info/120186/novel_and_non-food_crops/166/camelina/3 [accessed 25 January 2014].Google Scholar
Seemüller, E. and Harries, H. 2010. Plant resistance. In Phytoplasma genomes, plant hosts and vectors. Edited by P.G. Weintraub and P. Jones. CABI, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Pp. 147169.Google Scholar
Séguin-Swartz, G., Eynck, C., Gugel, R.K., Strelkov, S.E., Olivier, C.Y., Li, J.L., et al. 2009. Diseases of Camelina sativa (false flax). Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 31: 375386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, J.J., Bartelt, R.J., Zilkowski, B.W., and Cossé, A.A. 2005. Responses of flea beetle Phyllotreta cruciferae in the field to synthetic aggregation pheromone components and plant host volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 31: 18291843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, J. and Grenkow, L. 2013. Susceptibility of brassicaceous plants to feeding by flea beetles, Phyllotreta spp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 106: 25572567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. McGraw Hill, New York, New York, United States of America.Google Scholar
Sun, J.Y., Sønderby, I.E., Halkier, B.A., Jander, G., and de Vos, M. 2009. Non-volatile intact indole glucosinolates are host recognition cues for ovipositing Plutella xylostella. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 35: 14271436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valk, M. and Stevenson, A.B. 1994. Aster leafhoppers. In Diseases and pests of vegetables crops in Canada. Edited by R.J. Howard, J.A. Garland, and W.L. Seaman. The Canadian Phytopathological Society and the Entomological Society of Canada Press, Ottawa, Canada. Pp. 158159.Google Scholar
Weintraub, P.G. and Beanland, L. 2006. Insect vectors of phytoplasmas. Annual Review of Entomology, 51: 91111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weintraub, P.G. and Wilson, M.R. 2010. Control of phytoplasma diseases and vectors. In Phytoplasma genomes, plant hosts and vectors. Edited by P.G. Weintraub and P. Jones. CABI, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Pp. 233249.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, R.F. and Tully, J.G. 1979. The Mycoplasmas: Spiroplasmas, Acholeplasmas and Mycoplasmas of plants and arthropods, appendix I: partial listing of plants infected with Mycoplasma-like organisms, grouped by plant family, Volume V, Academic Press, San Diego, California, United States of America. Pp. 564617.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Wei, W., Davis, R.E., and Lee, I.-M. 2010. Recent advances in 16S rRNA gene-based phytoplasma differentiation, classification and taxonomy. In Phytoplasma genomes, plant hosts and vectors. Edited by P.G. Weintraub and P. Jones. CABI, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Pp. 6492.Google Scholar
18
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Interactions between Camelina sativa (Brassicaceae) and insect pests of canola
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Interactions between Camelina sativa (Brassicaceae) and insect pests of canola
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Interactions between Camelina sativa (Brassicaceae) and insect pests of canola
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *