Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:19:10.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pollen loads and pollen diversity on bodies of Eulonchus tristis (Diptera: Acroceridae): implications for pollination and flower visitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Christopher J. Borkent  and
Evert I. Schlinger
Christopher J. Borkent*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada H9X 3V9
Evert I. Schlinger
Affiliation:
World Spider-Endoparasitoid Laboratory, P.O. Box 1869, Santa Ynez, California 93460, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: cborkent@alumni.uvic.ca).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Acroceridae is a family of spider-parasitic flies that often visit flowers as adults, although little is known about their possible role as pollinators. Eulonchus tristis Loew visiting flowers of Brodiaea elegans Hoover (Liliaceae s.l.) and Iris douglasiana Herbert (Iridaceae) were collected in California. Individuals carried large pollen loads, although visitors to B. elegans carried significantly more pollen grains than visitors to I. douglasiana. Visitors to B. elegans also carried a higher percentage of focal-plant pollen (91%) than visitors to I. douglasiana (38%). There was no difference in the diversity of pollen species (approximately nine) carried by visitors to either plant species. For visitors to B. elegans, no difference was seen in the amount or diversity of pollen carried with respect to the sex of the visitor. The behaviour potentially resulting in the acquisition of these pollen loads is discussed. These results show that E. tristis has the potential to be an important pollinator for these plant species, particularly B. elegans.

Résumé

Les Acroceridae sont des mouches parasitoïdes d’araignées dont les adultes visitent souvent les fleurs, bien qu’on connaisse mal leur rôle potentiel comme pollinisateurs. Nous avons récolté en Californie des individus d’Eulonchustristis Loew en train de visiter des fleurs de Brodiaea elegans Hoover (Liliaceae s.l.) et d’Iris douglasiana Herbert (Iridaceae) en Californie. Ces insectes portaient d’importantes charges de pollen, bien que ceux qui visitaient B. elegans transportaient significativement plus de grains de pollen que ceux qui visitaient I. douglasiana. Les individus qui visitaient B. elegans transportaient aussi un pourcentage plus élevé de pollen de cette plante ciblé (91%) que ceux qui visitaient I. douglasiana (38%). Il n’y avait pas de différence de diversité dans les espèces de pollen (environ neuf) transportées par les visiteurs de chacune des plantes deux plantes. Chez les insectes qui visitaient B. elegans, ni la quantité ni la diversité du pollen ne variaient en fonction du sexe. Les comportements possiblement reliés à ces charges polliniques y sont aussi discutés. Nos résultats montrent donc qu’E. tristis peut potentiellement être un important pollinisateur des ces espèces végétales, particulièrement de B. elegans.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 140 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 257 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P.H., Reitz, S.R., and Watson, C.N. 1997. Distribution and abundance of Eulonchus marialiciae (Diptera: Acroceridae). Entomological News, 108: 190–192.Google Scholar
Beattie, A.J. 1971. Pollination mechanisms in Viola. New Phytologist, 70: 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, R.Y. 1996. Development of ovule, embryo sac, and endosperm in Dipterostemon and Dichelostemma (Alliaceae) relative to taxonomy. American Journal of Botany, 83: 790–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkent, C.B., and Harder, L.D. 2007. Flies (Diptera) as pollinators of two dioecious plants: behaviour and implications for plant mating. The Canadian Entomologist, 139: 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkent, C.B., and Schlinger, E.I. 2008. Flower visiting and mating behaviour of Eulonchus sapphirinus (Diptera: Acroceridae). The Canadian Entomologist, 140: 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, R., and Machado, I.C. 2006. Rodriguezia bahiensis Rchb. f.: biologia floral, polinizadores e primeiro registro de polinização por moscas Acroceridae em Orchidaceae. Revista Brasileira de Botânica, 29: 461–470.Google Scholar
Cole, F.R. 1919. The dipterous family Cyrtidae in North America. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 45: 1–79.Google Scholar
Cole, F.R. 1969. The flies of western North America [With the collaboration of E.I. Schlinger.] University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Davis, A.R. 1997. Pollination efficiency of insects. In Pollen biotechnology for crop production and improvement. Edited by Shivanna, K.R. and Sawhney, V.K.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. pp. 87–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devoto, M., and Medan, D. 2006. Diversity, distribution, and floral specificity of tangle-veined flies (Diptera: Nemestrinidae) in north west Patagonia, Argentina. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 79: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deyrup, M.A. 1988. Pollen-feeding in Poecilognathus punctipennis (Diptera: Bombyliidae). The Florida Entomologist, 71: 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldblatt, P., and Manning, J.C. 1999. The longproboscid fly pollination system in Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 86: 758–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldblatt, P., and Manning, J.C. 2000. The longproboscid fly pollination system in southern Africa. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 87: 146–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldblatt, P., Manning, J.C., and Bernhardt, P. 1995. Pollination biology of Lapeirousia subgenus Lapeirousia (Iridaceae) in southern Africa: floral divergence and adaptation for long-tongued flypollination. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 82: 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldblatt, P., Manning, J.C., and Bernhardt, P. 1998. Notes on the pollination of Gladiolus brevifolius (Iridaceae) by bees (Anthophoridae) and bee mimicking flies (Psilodera: Acroceridae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 70: 297–304.Google Scholar
Grant, J. 1960. A note on Eulonchus tristis Lw. (Diptera: Cyrtidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 57: 33.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. 1988. Bee flies and bluets: Bombylius (Diptera: Bombyliidae) flower-constant on the distylous species, Hedyotis caerulea (Rubiaceae), and the manner of foraging. Journal of Natural History, 22: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S.D., and Dafni, A. 1998. Response of beeflies to the shape and pattern of model flowers: implications for floral evolution in a Mediterranean herb. Functional Ecology, 12: 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S.D., and Midgley, J.J. 1997. Fly pollination of Gorteria diffusa (Asteraceae), and a possible mimetic function for dark spots on the capitulum. American Journal of Botany, 84: 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, C.A., and Inouye, D.W. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, Colorado.Google Scholar
Kearns, C.A., and Inouye, D.W. 1994. Fly pollination of Linum lewisii (Linaceae). American Journal of Botany, 81: 1091–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, M.M., and Velterop, O. 1997. Flower visitation by generalists and specialists: analysis of pollinator quality. Proceedings Experimental and Applied Entomology (Amsterdam), 8: 85–89.Google Scholar
Larson, B.M.H., Kevan, P.G., and Inouye, D.W. 2001. Flies and flowers: taxonomic diversity of anthophiles and pollinators. The Canadian Entomologist, 133: 439–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luz, J.R.P. 2004. A associação de Philopota sp. Wiedemann (Diptera, Acroceridae) com flores do gervão-azul, Stachytarphetta cayenensis (Verbenaceae) na Ilha Marambaia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Entomologia y Vectores, 11: 681–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potgieter, C.J., Edwards, T.J., Miller, R.M., and Van Staden, J. 1999. Pollination of seven Plectranthus spp. (Lamiaceae) in southern Natal, South Africa. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 218: 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabrosky, C.W. 1948. A further contribution to the classification of the North American spider parasites of the family Acroceridae (Diptera). American Midland Naturalist, 39: 382–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlinger, E.I. 1960. A review of the genus Eulonchus Gerstaecker. Part I. The species of the smaragdinus group (Diptera: Acroceridae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 53: 416–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza-Silva, M., Fontenella, J.C.R., and Martins, R.P. 2001. Seasonal abundance and species composition of flower-visiting flies. Neotropical Entomology, 30: 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS Inc. 2006. SPSS®, release 15.0 [computer program]. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Uno, G.E. 1982. Comparative reproductive biology of hermaphroditic and male-sterile Iris douglasiana Herb. (Iridaceae). American Journal of Botany, 69: 818–823.Google Scholar
Wiesenborn, W.D. 2003. Insects on Pholisma sonorae (Lennoaceae) flowers and their conspecific pollen loads. Madroño, 50: 110–114.Google Scholar
Williams, G.A., and Adam, P. 1998. Pollen loads collected from large insects in Australian subtropical rainforests. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 120: 49–67.Google Scholar
Yeboah Gyan, K., and Woodell, S.R.J. 1987. Analysis of insect pollen loads and pollination efficiency of some common insect visitors of four species of woody Rosaceae. Functional Ecology, 1: 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar