Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Development and validation of a prediction rule for early discharge of low-risk emergency department patients with potential ischemic chest pain

  • Frank Xavier Scheuermeyer (a1), Hubert Wong (a1), Eugenia Yu (a1), Barb Boychuk (a1), Grant Innes (a1), Eric Grafstein (a2), Kenneth Gin (a3) and Jim Christenson (a1)...
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objectives:

Current guidelines emphasize that emergency department (ED) patients at low risk for potential ischemic chest pain cannot be discharged without extensive investigations or hospitalization to minimize the risk of missing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We sought to derive and validate a prediction rule that permitted 20 to 30% of ED patients without ACS safely to be discharged within 2 hours without further provocative cardiac testing.

Methods:

This prospective cohort study enrolled 1,669 chest pain patients in two blocks in 2000–2003 (development cohort) and 2006 (validation cohort). The primary outcome was 30-day ACS diagnosis. A recursive partitioning model incorporated reliable and predictive cardiac risk factors, pain characteristics, electrocardiographic findings, and cardiac biomarker results.

Results:

In the derivation cohort, 165 of 763 patients (21.6%) had a 30-day ACS diagnosis. The derived prediction rule was 100.0% sensitive and 18.6% specific. In the validation cohort, 119 of 906 patients (13.1%) had ACS, and the prediction rule was 99.2% sensitive (95% CI 95.4–100.0) and 23.4% specific (95% CI 20.6–26.5). Patients have a very low ACS risk if arrival and 2-hour troponin levels are normal, the initial electrocardiogram is nonischemic, there is no history of ACS or nitrate use, age is < 50 years, and defined pain characteristics are met. The validation of the rule was limited by the lack of consistency in data capture, incomplete follow-up, and lack of evaluation of the accuracy, comfort, and clinical sensibility of this clinical decision rule.

Conclusion:

The Vancouver Chest Pain Rule may identify a cohort of ED chest pain patients who can be safely discharged within 2 hours without provocative cardiac testing. Further validation across other centres with consistent application and comprehensive and uniform follow-up of all eligible and enrolled patients, in addition to measuring and reporting the accuracy of and comfort level with applying the rule and the clinical sensibility, should be completed prior to adoption and implementation.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Development and validation of a prediction rule for early discharge of low-risk emergency department patients with potential ischemic chest pain
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Development and validation of a prediction rule for early discharge of low-risk emergency department patients with potential ischemic chest pain
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Development and validation of a prediction rule for early discharge of low-risk emergency department patients with potential ischemic chest pain
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6; frankscheuermeyer@yahoo.ca
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2. S Goodacre , E Cross , J Arnold , et al. The health care burden of acute chest pain. Heart 2005;91:229–30, doi:10.1136/hrt.2003.027599.

3. JH Pope , TO Aufderheide , R Ruthazer , et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1163–70, doi:10.1056/NEJM200004203421603.

4. JM Christenson , GD Innes , RD McKnight , et al. Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort. CMAJ 2004;170:1803–7.

5. A Karcz , R Korn , MC Burke , et al. Malpractice claims against emergency physicians in Massachusetts: 1975–1993. Am J Emerg Med 1996;14:341–5, doi:10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90044-3.

8. E Amsterdam , J Kirk , D Bluemke , et al. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;122:756–76, doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181ec61df.

10. HP Selker , JR Beshansky , JL Griffith , et al. Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. A multicenter, controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:845–55, doi:10.7326/0003-4819-129-11_Part_1-199812010-00002.

11. FM Fesmire , AD Hughes , EP Fody , et al. The Erlanger chest pain evaluation protocol: a one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2002;40:584–94, doi:10.1067/mem.2002.129506.

12. R Bassan , L Pimenta , M Scofano , JF. Soares Accuracy of a neural diagnostic tree for the identification of acute coronary syndrome in patients with chest pain and no ST-segment elevation. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2004;3:72–8, doi:10.1097/01.hpc.0000128713.08115.54.

14. RJ Marsan , KJ Shaver , KL Sease , et al. Evaluation of a clinical decision rule for young adult patients with chest pain. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:2631, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2005.tb01473.x.

15. R Lyons , AC Morris , D Caesar , et al. Chest pain presenting to the emergency department—to stratify risk with GRACE or TIMI? Resuscitation 2007;74:90–3, doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.11.023.

16. EP Hess , JJ Perry , LA Calder , et al. Prospective validation of a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17:368–75, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00696.x.

17. J. Greene The perils of low-risk chest pain: emergency physicians struggle to balance risk with overtesting. Ann Emerg Med 2010;56:25A-8A, doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.021.

18. JM Pines , CV Pollack , DB Diercks , et al. The association between emergency department crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16:1725, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00364.x.

19. DB Diercks , MT Roe , AY Chen , et al. Prolonged emergency department stays of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients are associated with worse adherence to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for management and increased adverse events. Ann Emerg Med 2007;50:489–96, doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.033.

20. JM Christenson , GD Innes , RD McKnight , et al. A clinical prediction rule for early discharge of patients with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med 2006;47:110, doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.08.007.

21. CK McGougan , JM Christenson , GD Innes , J. Raboud Emergency physicians’ attitudes toward a clinical prediction rule for the identification and early discharge of low risk patients with chest discomfort. CJEM 2001;3:8994.

22. IG Stiell , GA. Wells Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:437–47, doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70309-4.

23. A Laupacis , N Sekar , IG. Stiell Clinical prediction rules: a review and suggested modifications of methodologic standards. JAMA 1997;277:488–94, doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540300056034.

25. R Beveridge , J Ducharme , L Janes , et al. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: inter-rater agreement. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:155–9, doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70223-4.

27.Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2000;21:1502–13, doi:10.1053/euhj.2000.2305.

28. EP Hess , V Thiruganasambandamoorthy , GA Wells , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical prediction rules to exclude acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department setting: a clinical review. CJEM 2008;10:373–83.

29. EP Hess , GA Wells , A Jaffe , IG. Stiell A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology. BMC Emerg Med 2008;8:3, doi:10.1186/1471-227X-8-3.

30. M Than , L Cullen , CM Reid , et al. A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study. Lancet 2011;377:1077–84, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60310-3.

31. T Keller , T Zeller , D Peetz , et al. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2009;361:868–77, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0903515.

32. T Reichlin , W Hochholzer , S Bassetti , et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive troponin assays. N Engl J Med 2009;361:858–67, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0900428.

33. T Keller , T Zeller , F Ojeda , et al. Serial changes in highly sensitive troponin I assay and early diagnosis of myocardial infarction. JAMA 2011;306:2684–93, doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1896.

34. NL Mills , A Churchhouse , KK Lee , et al. Implementation of a sensitive troponin I assay and risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and death in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 2011;305:1210–6, doi:10.1001/jama.2011.338.

35. AM Chang , FS Shofer , JA Tabas , et al. Lack of association between left bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction in symptomatic ED patients. Am J Emerg Med 2009;27:916–21, doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2008.07.007.

36. JG Canto , MG Shlipak , W Rodgers , et al. Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain. JAMA 2000;283:3223–9, doi:10.1001/jama.283.24.3223.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1481-8035
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-emergency-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 62 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 236 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.