Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:14:10.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variability in the emergency department use of discretionary radiographs in children with common respiratory conditions: the mixed effect of access to pediatrician care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2015

Astrid Guttmann ,
Michael Weinstein ,
Peter C. Austin ,
Azim Bhamani  and
Geoffrey Anderson
Astrid Guttmann*
Affiliation:
Division of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
Michael Weinstein
Affiliation:
Division of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Peter C. Austin
Affiliation:
Division of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
Azim Bhamani
Affiliation:
Division of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children
Geoffrey Anderson
Affiliation:
Division of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
*
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G Wing, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5; astrid.guttmann@ices.on.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

The objective of this study was to investigate whether different staffing models are associated with variation in radiograph use for children seen for bronchiolitis, croup, and asthma and discharged home from emergency departments (EDs) in Ontario.

Methods:

We surveyed all Ontario EDs regarding physician staffing models and use of clinical protocols. We used a population-based ED database to determine radiograph rates and patient characteristics. Regression techniques that controlled for patient factors and clustering within EDs were applied.

Results:

From April 2004 to March 2006, 5,186, 10,408, and 35,150 children were discharged home from an ED with bronchiolitis, croup, and asthma, respectively. Radiograph rates were 42.7% for bronchiolitis, 10.1% for croup, and 25.9% for asthma. Over 50% of children were treated in EDs with nonpediatric front-line care but with consultant pediatricians available. Compared to children in these settings, those seen in EDs with front-line pediatric staff were less likely to have radiographs for all three conditions (adjusted odds ratios [ORs] 0.47 [95% CI 0.24–0.95], 0.47 [95% CI 0.27–0.82], 0.13 [95% CI 0.02–0.66] for bronchiolitis, croup, and asthma, respectively). Children in community hospitals with pediatricians were significantly more likely to have a radiograph if seen by a consultant pediatrician (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.20–1.63 [bronchiolitis]; OR 2.76, 95% CI 2.16–3.53 [croup]; and OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.64–2.36 [asthma]). We found no association between clinical protocol use and radiograph rates.

Conclusions:

High rates of discretionary radiograph use exist for common respiratory problems of children seen across ED settings. Quality improvement efforts should be focused in this area, and radiograph use in EDs staffed by front-line pediatrics-trained staff could serve as an initial benchmark target for other institutions.

Keywords

asthmabronchiolitiscroupemergency carequalityradiography
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 8 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2013

References

REFERENCES

1.Athey, J, Dean, JM, Ball, J, et al. Ability of hospitals to care for pediatric emergency patients. Pediatr Emerg Care 2001; 17: 170–4, doi:10.1097/00006565-200106000-00005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Middleton, KR, Burt, CW. Availability of pediatric services and equipment in emergency departments: United States, 2002–03. Adv Data 2006; (367): 1–16.Google Scholar
3.Cimpello, LB, Khine, H, Avner, JR. Practice patterns of pediatric versus general emergency physicians for pain management of fractures in pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care 2004; 20: 228–32, doi:10.1097/01.pec.0000121242.99242.e0.Google Scholar
4.Dharmar, M, Marcin, JP, Romano, PS, et al. Quality of care of children in the emergency department: association with hospital setting and physician training. J Pediatr 2008; 153: 783–9, doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.025.Google Scholar
5.Belfer, RA, Gittelman, MA, Muniz, AE. Management of febrile infants and children by pediatric emergency medicine and emergency medicine: comparison with practice guidelines. Pediatr Emerg Care 2001; 17: 83–7, doi:10.1097/00006565-200104000-00001.Google Scholar
6.Schweich, PJ, Smith, KM, Dowd, MD, Walkley, EI. Pediatric emergency medicine practice patterns: a comparison of pediatric and general emergency physicians. Pediatr Emerg Care 1998; 14: 89–94, doi:10.1097/00006565-199804000-00001.Google Scholar
7.Seeman, N, Magistretti, A, Baker, GR. Hospital report 2005: Emergency department care. Hospital Report Research Collaborative, University of Toronto. Toronto: Joint Initiative of the Ontario Hospital Association and the Government of Ontario; 2005.Google Scholar
8.Pitts, SR, Niska, RW, Xu, J, Burt, CW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Rep 2008; (7): 1–38.Google Scholar
9.Guttmann, A, Razzaq, A, Lindsay, P, et al. Development of measures of the quality of emergency department care for children using a structured panel process. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 114–23, doi:10.1542/peds.2005-3029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Swingler, GH, Hussey, GD, Zwarenstein, M. Randomised controlled trial of clinical outcome after chest radiograph in ambulatory acute lower-respiratory infection in children. Lancet 1998; 351: 404–8, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07013-X.Google Scholar
11.Roback, MG, Dreitlein, DA. Chest radiograph in the evaluation of first time wheezing episodes: review of current clinical practice and efficacy. Pediatr Emerg Care 1998; 14: 181–4, doi:10.1097/00006565-199806000-00001.Google Scholar
12.Ismail, Y, Loo, CS, Zahary, MK. The value of routine chest radiographs in acute asthma admissions. Singapore Med J 1994; 35: 171–2.Google Scholar
13.Schuh, S, Lalani, A, Allen, U, et al. Evaluation of the utility of radiography in acute bronchiolitis. J Pediatr 2007; 150: 429–33, doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.01.005.Google Scholar
14.Christakis, DA, Cowan, CA, Garrison, MM, et al. Variation in inpatient diagnostic testing and management of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 878–84, doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Wilson, SD, Dahl, BB, Wells, RD. An evidence-based clinical pathway for bronchiolitis safely reduces antibiotic overuse. Am J Med Qual 2002; 17: 195–9, doi:10.1177/106286060201700507.Google Scholar
16.Knapp, JF, Simon, SD, Sharma, V. Quality of care for common pediatric respiratory illnesses in United States emergency departments: analysis of 2005 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 1165–70, doi:10.1542/peds.2007-3237.006565-199804000-00001.Google Scholar
17.Canadian Institute for Health Information. CIHI data quality study of Ontario emergency department visits for fiscal year 2004–2005. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2008.Google Scholar
18.Guttmann, A, Zagorski, B, Austin, PC, et al. Effectiveness of emergency department asthma management strategies on return visits in children: a population-based study. Pediatrics 2007; 120: e1402-10, doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Wagg, J, Economou, V, Razzaq, A, et al. Hospital report 2007: emergency department care technical summary clinical utilization & outcomes. Government of Ontario in partnership with the Ontario Hospital Association. Available at: http://www.hospitalreport.ca/downloads/2007/EDC/ed_report_2007.pdf (accessed November 30, 2011).Google Scholar
20.To, T, Dell, S, Dick, PT, et al. Case verification of children with asthma in Ontario. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2006; 17(1): 69–76, doi:10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00346.x.Google Scholar
21.Manos, D, Petrie, DA, Beveridge, RC, et al. Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale. CJEM 2002; 4: 16–22.Google Scholar
22.Stenstrom, R, Grafstein, EJ, Innes, GD, Christenson, JM. The predictive validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS). Acad Emerg Med 2009; 10: 512, doi:10.1197/aemj.10.5.512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Wilkins, R.PCCF+ version 3G user’s guide (Geocodes/PCCF). Automated geographic coding based on Statistics Canada postal code conversion files, including postal codes to June 2001. Ottawa: Health Analysis and Modeling Group, Social and Economic Studies Division, Statistics Canada; 2001. Report No.: Cat.No. 82F0086-XDB.Google Scholar
24.Zeger, SL, Liang, KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986; 42: 121–30, doi:10.2307/2531248.Google Scholar
25.Hampers, LC, Faries, SG. Practice variation in the emergency management of croup. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 505–8, doi:10.1542/peds.109.3.505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Perlstein, PH, Kotagal, UR, Schoettker, PJ, et al. Sustaining the implementation of an evidence-based guideline for bronchiolitis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154: 1001–7.Google Scholar
27.Bailey, R, Weingarten, S, Lewis, M, Mohsenifar, Z. Impact of clinical pathways and practice guidelines on the management of acute exacerbations of bronchial asthma. Chest 1998; 113: 28–33, doi:10.1378/chest.113.1.28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Norton, SP, Pusic, MV, Taha, F, et al. Effect of a clinical pathway on the hospitalisation rates of children with asthma: a prospective study. Arch Dis Child 2007; 92: 60–6, doi:10.1136/adc.2006.097287.Google Scholar
29.Browne, GJ, Giles, H, McCaskill, ME, et al. The benefits of using clinical pathways for managing acute paediatric illness in an emergency department. J Qual Clin Pract 2001; 21: 50–5, doi:10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00405.x.Google Scholar
30.Chin, R, Browne, GJ, Lam, LT, et al. Effectiveness of a croup clinical pathway in the management of children with croup presenting to an emergency department. J Paediatr Child Health 2002; 38: 382–7, doi:10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00011.x.Google Scholar
31.Gentile, NT, Ufberg, J, Barnum, M, et al. Guidelines reduce x-ray and blood gas utilization in acute asthma. Am J Emerg Med 2003; 21: 451–3, doi:10.1016/S0735-6757(03)00165-7.Google Scholar
32.Buckmaster, A, Boon, R. Reduce the rads: a quality assurance project on reducing unnecessary chest X-rays in children with asthma. J Paediatr Child Health 2005; 41: 107–11, doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2005.00559.x.Google Scholar
33.Gildenhuys, J, Lee, M, Isbister, GK. Does implementation of a paediatric asthma clinical practice guideline worksheet change clinical practice? Int J Emerg Med 2009; 2: 33–9, doi:10.1007/s12245-008-0063-x.Google Scholar
34.Grol, R, Grimshaw, J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003; 362: 1225–30, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.Google Scholar
35.Hederos, CA, Janson, S, Andersson, H, Hedlin, G. Chest x-ray investigation in newly discovered asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2004; 15: 163–5, doi:10.1046/j.1399-3038.2003.00098.x.Google Scholar
36.Chamberlain, JM, Patel, KM, Pollack, MM. The Pediatric Risk of Hospital Admission score: a second-generation severity-of-illness score for pediatric emergency patients. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 388–95, doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0586.Google Scholar