1. Journal Overview
The Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine (CJEM)
CJEM is Canada’s only academic journal in emergency medicine and the official publication of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP). CJEM publishes articles of interest to emergency care providers in rural, urban or academic settings that reflect the growing interest in emergency medicine, both as a medical discipline and an expanding field for research. CJEM is indexed by the National Library of Medicine.
a. Vision, Mission & Objectives (as approved by the CAEP Board February 2018)
Inspiring Excellence in emergency medical care
To improve emergency medical care by connecting and informing providers
1. To promote communication and information exchange amongst physicians practicing emergency medicine in Canada, including those providing care in rural communities;
2. To improve emergency care of patients in Canada and elsewhere;
3. To provide current evidence to assist physicians practicing emergency medicine;
4. To disseminate high-quality emergency medicine scholarly work in research and education, produced by Canadians;
5. To provide scholarly opportunities for medical students, residents, and newly practicing physicians;
6. To promote communication amongst non-physician Canadian emergency care providers;
7. To disseminate Canadian emergency medicine content internationally; and,
8. To be among the top three emergency medicine journals within 5 years.
b. Ethical Standards
Where research involves data from human subjects, we require a statement that the research has been approved or exempted from review by the relevant institutional Research Ethics Board.
In accordance with the in Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals, manuscripts will be considered only if they have not been previously published nor are they under consideration by another journal. Authors are referred to "Uniform Requirements" for detailed guidelines on previous publication and exceptions.
c. Manuscript Style
2. Manuscript Categories
a. Original Research Manuscript
(maximum 2500 words, 5 tables or figures, 40 references)
Encompasses any type of research that provides original data, including: prospective studies, qualitative research, health record reviews, surveys, systematic reviews, and quality improvement studies.
Brief Original Research
(maximum 1200 words, one table or figure, and 10 references)
While the article types for the Brief Original Research are the same as Original Research, these articles are limited to a maximum of 1200 words, one table or figure, and 10 references. Other tables or figures can be included as online appendices. Submissions of this type will highlight the most important aspects and findings of your research and may improve the likelihood of acceptance.
These articles present primary data arising from original research. CJEM requires randomized controlled trials to be registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. For more information, see Clinical Trial Registration on the ICMJE website. The trials registry and research ethics board registration numbers should be included in the manuscript.
Authors should consult the appropriate checklist according to the study design and confirm that the paper is in compliance, as per EQUATOR Network: https://www.equator-network.or...
Structured abstracts of up to 250 words are required for both Original Research and Brief Original Research submission types and must include the following headings: Objectives; Methods; Results; and Conclusions.
For Original Research and Brief Original Research submission types, please provide a brief simplified Clinicians’ Capsule, comprised of four single-sentence bullet statements under these headings, not exceeding 20 words per bullet. See the example below:
What is known about the topic?
ED physicians frequently miss opportunities to prescribe oral anticoagulants (OACs) to patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter (AFF)
What did this study ask?
What was the impact of implementing a new evidence-based AAF clinical pathway on OAC prescribing behaviour
What did this study find?
This pre-post study found a 20% absolute increase in appropriate OAC prescribing along decreased lengths of stay and decreased return visits
Why does this study matter to clinicians?
Local implementation of a similar pathway could lead to better and more efficient care of AFF patients
Introduction: This section should succinctly discuss (maximum three paragraphs) study background, importance and rationale, and the study objectives.
Methods: This section should normally include the following paragraphs with these subheadings (as applicable):
- Study Design and Time period;
- Study Setting;
- Outcome Measures;
- Data Analysis; and
- Sample Size.
There should be sufficient detail to allow a knowledgeable reader to replicate the study, at least in theory. Authors must explicitly name the Research Ethics Board that approved the research or exempted the project from REB review.
Results: In this section, authors should present primary and secondary results, without undue repetition of data reported in tables and figures. Each paragraph should refer to a specific table or figure. Generally, results should be reported to a single decimal point in the text, tables and figures. All results should be reported using SI units, including molar rather than mass-based units for concentration in most cases.
Please limit use of P values to those of major outcome comparisons. In general, we wish to see the "size of effect" and its associated confidence intervals. Such reporting is advocated by the CONSORT statement and permits readers to gauge the approximate power and clinical importance of the observed magnitude of effect.
Discussion: Authors are encouraged to provide the following paragraphs using these subheadings:
- Interpretation of Findings (minimize use of numbers);
- Comparison to Previous Studies (maximum 2 paragraphs);
- Strengths and Limitations;
- Clinical Implications;
- Research Implications; and
References: Maximum of 40 references formatted using the Vancouver style. Within the text, reference citations should be numbered in the order they appear using superscript numbers, and placed following punctuation marks. References should cite surname and initials for up to six authors, followed by “et al.”
Tables: Tables must be placed within the main manuscript document.
Please follow the following recommendations:
- Use MS Word;
- Do not use PowerPoint or Excel;
- Each table should appear on a separate page at the end of the article after the references;
- Each table should have a title and be numbered in order of callout within the text;
- Excessive use of horizontal lines and all shading should be avoided;
- Avoid all non-standard abbreviations; and,
- Provide units of measure where appropriate.
Please follow the following recommendations:
- Each individual figure should be placed within the main manuscript document, after the tables;
- Each figure should be on a separate page;
- Titles should be on the page with the figure;
- Figures must be clearly numbered in order of callout; and
- Photographs and colour images should also be uploaded as separate files (TIF, JPG, or EPS files, 600 dpi, and five inches in width.)
Acknowledgements: You should acknowledge individuals or organizations that provided advice or support (non-financial).
Financial support: Please provide specific details of the funding for the research, or provide the following statement: "This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors."
Conflict of Interest: Please provide details of all known financial, professional and personal relationships with the potential to bias the work. Where no known conflicts of interest exist, please include the following statement: "None." Such conflicts might arise from personal relationships or from institutional relationships. CJEM has adopted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors policy on disclosure of conflicts, including the glossary which provides a definition of conflict of interest and other terms surrounding potential conflicts. Each author of a work must complete and submit a conflict of interest form (See below).
(maximum 1000 words, 1 figure or table, and 10 references)
By invitation of the editors, authors may submit a commentary to accompany an original research article in a given issue.
Author Initiated Commentary
(maximum 1500 words, 1 figure or table, and 10 references)
Authors may submit a focused discussion commenting on major current issues or controversial matters with significant implications for emergency medicine.
CJEM Debate Series
(maximum 1500 words, no tables or figures, and 10 references)
The CJEM debate series provides readers with the opportunity to hear differing perspectives on topics pertinent to the practice of Emergency Medicine. The debating authors are allocated opposing arguments on topics where there is some controversy or perhaps scientific equipoise. The series also involves a social media vote and online conversation. The debate format consists of an editorial style component (1000-1500 words) for each side, often incorporating a short rebuttal section.
CJEM Journal Club
The preferred review methodology, including critical review forms, is described in "Users Guide to the Medical Literature," a series published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Authors wishing specific guidance should consider making use of the critical appraisal tools found at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine or peruse articles published in ACP Journal.
(maximum 1000 words, and 5 references)
Submissions should reflect the challenges of working in medicine. Generally, they should be humorous or provide some human interest and add to our understanding of the physician experience, particularly in Canada.
The Penelope Gray-Allen Memorial CJEM Writing Award
(maximum 1000 words, and 5 references; Call for papers in December)
In honour of our former Managing Editor, this award is open to any RCPSC or CFPC emergency medicine resident in Canada and will be award for the best paper with a focus on humanities in emergency medicine.
· Paper published in the CAEP Conference issue of CJEM;
· $500 towards your flight to conference or conference registration; and,
· Honoured with a plaque acknowledging you as the recipient during awards ceremony at CAEP.
c. CAEP Paper
Authors should communicate directly with the CAEP Head Office. Further information on CAEP position statements and guidelines can be found here [http://caep.ca/CAEPPositionStatementsGuidelines].
CAEP Position Statement & Guidelines
(Executive Summary, maximum 8 pages)
Executive summaries should be structured as follows: Unstructured Abstract, Introduction, Rationale, List of Recommendations; Tables summarizing recommendations; Going forward – what CAEP thinks next steps should be; Conclusion.
CAEP Academic Symposium Paper
(maximum 2,500 words, 5 tables or /figures, and 20 references)
CAEP’s Academic Symposium panels will publish their recommendations in CJEM, following presentations and peer feedback at CAEP’s annual conference. Submissions should be structured as follows: Abstract (objectives, methods, conclusion); Introduction; Methods; Summary of Recommendations; Conclusion; References. All Academic Symposium Papers must be submitted to CAEP’s Manager for the Academic Section, Ms. Shanna Scarrow (email@example.com).
d. Just the Facts
(maximum 1000, 1 info-graphic, figure or table, and 5 references)
CJEM will consider original summary submissions that provide an up to date focused clinical synopsis of best practice on key topics relevant to Canadian clinicians. Each summary should be based around a typical case example of clinical question.
Submissions should be structured as follows:
- Brief case description;
- Brief statement of clinical question;
- A box containing five to seven key points from the literature that provide clear guidance on the case or question;
- An info-graphic, figure or table that provides a rapid-read overview of the paper should be included;
- provide a list of 5 or less references or further reading recommendations; and
- Consider co-authoring the article with an emergency physician or specialist with expertise in the topic area.
e. Educational Innovation
(maximum 1000 words, 1 figure or table, and 10 references)
CJEM will consider original scholarly submissions that are not original research, but that discuss educational advances in emergency medicine. Authors should define how the submission is innovative, builds on existing literature and adds to the scholarship of education.
Submissions should be structured as follows:
- Purpose or Rationale;
- Description of the Innovation;
- Discussion; and
Sufficient detail allowing readers to reproduce the innovation is required. If necessary, forms or other tools required to set up the innovation may be accepted for publication as on-line appendices. An unstructured abstract of less than 150 words is also required.
f. Clinical Correspondence
(maximum 1000 words, 1 figure or table, and 5 references)
This section includes case reports, which have an interesting image and useful implications for clinical practice. All cases for consideration should have a "take home" clinical message pertinent to Emergency Physicians. No abstract.
(maximum 400 words and 5 references – letters will only be published online)
Letters should be addressed to the Editor and will be considered for publication if they relate to topics of interest to emergency physicians in urban, rural, community, or academic settings, or if they are in response to (and relevant to) a recent CJEM publication. Letters are generally not peer reviewed but may be edited for brevity and clarity. Letters responding to a previously published CJEM article should be submitted within eight weeks of the article's publication. Authors whose work is discussed will typically be given an opportunity to respond.
3. Formatting & Manuscript Submissions
a) Cover Letter
All submissions should be accompanied by a brief cover letter. Within the cover letter, the corresponding author should disclose potential conflicts of interest and financial support, specify each author's contribution to the work, and indicate that all co-authors have had the opportunity to review the final manuscript and have provided their permission to publish the manuscript.
b) Title page
The title page should include the article title, the authors' name(s) as they should appear in print, and the affiliations and degrees of all authors. The name, address, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail address for the corresponding author should be provided. The title page must also include a word count, running header of no more than 4 words, and keywords.
Choose the article title carefully. Be creative and ensure that the title accurately reflects the content of the article.
Maximum references as specified by submission type, formatted using the Vancouver style. Within the text, references should be numbered in the order they appear using superscript numbers, following the punctuation mark. References should cite surname and initials for up to six authors, followed by “et al.”
d. Conflict of Interest
Each author of a work must complete and submit a conflict of interest form [http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf]. Completed conflict of interest declarations must be uploaded at the time of manuscript submission.
e. Copyright Transfer Form
Articles accepted for publication will require a Copyright Transfer Form to be completed and returned to firstname.lastname@example.org.
f. Author Language Services
CJEM publishes articles in English and will provide French abstracts. For all articles, Cambridge recommends that authors have their manuscripts checked by an English language native speaker before submission; this will ensure that submissions are judged at peer review exclusively on academic merit. We list a number of third-party services specializing in language editing and/or translation, and suggest that authors contact as appropriate. Use of any of these services is voluntary, and at the author's own expense.
4. Review and editorial Processes
All submissions are initially reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief or one of the Deputy Editors. Articles judged unsuitable for CJEM will be returned to the authors following this step, typically within two weeks. Those meeting screening criteria will be forwarded for blinded peer review, except for CAEP Paper, Invited Commentary, and Letters to the Editor.
To revise your manuscript, log in and enter your Author Centre, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." Under "Actions," click on "Create a Revision." Your manuscript number will be appended to denote a revision. You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of the manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. You must highlight the changes to your manuscript within the document, ideally by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or colored text. Through your Author Centre, please upload and submit both the clean and tracked changes version of your manuscript.
When submitting your revised manuscript, you will be able to respond to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. In this space, please address each of the suggestions and cite where in the manuscript the change has been made. If no change was made, please explain why. To expedite the processing of the revised manuscript, please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s).
All revisions will be reviewed by the Decision Editor, who may consult with the original or new peer reviewers, to determine whether review comments have been addressed. The Decision Editor, along with the Editor-in-Chief or a Senior Editor, will make a final decision regarding publication. Accepted articles will be edited, and authors will have the opportunity to review and approve revisions prior to publication. Manuscripts submitted to CJEM will be treated with respect and confidentiality.
In the event you wish to appeal a decision, please provide a letter specifying why, providing support for your request. The appeal request will be reviewed by the Editorial Office and, if warranted, will be returned to the Decision Editor for consideration.
Published manuscripts become the property of CAEP and may not be published elsewhere without permission.
5. Contacting CJEM Editors
Authors with questions regarding a submission or prospective authors who wish to discuss a paper in the development stage are encouraged to contact the Editor-in-Chief or the appropriate Section Editor by e-mail at email@example.com. Further information can be obtained from the Editor-in-Chief or the Managing Editor at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Authors are encouraged to submit articles in many areas of research. Common methodological guidelines for reporting different types of studies have been summarized below. Authors should generally follow these reporting guidelines for a given study design, in an effort to improve the overall quality of the medical literature. Please be advised that this list should not be considered comprehensive for all possible study designs.
Further information can be obtained from the Editor-in-Chief or the Managing Editor at email@example.com.
Randomized Controlled Trial - Superiority design
Randomized Controlled Trial - Non-Inferiority/Equivalence design
Diagnostic Test Performance Study
Systematic Review of Diagnostic Tests
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies