Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Tatar DP

  • Ekaterina Lyutikova (a1) and Asya Pereltsvaig


In this paper, we reconsider whether article-less languages have the DP projection, focusing on Tatar. We argue that putative correlations between the presence/absence of articles in a language and various DP-external phenomena (e.g. Left-Branch Extraction, superiority effects, and others), discussed by Bošković and Şener (2014), inter alia, do not hold if a broader range of languages is considered more carefully. Instead, we show that certain correlations obtain between the internal structure, syntactic position, case marking, and interpretation of. noun phrases found in distinct structural environments: direct objects, possessors, and complements of the so-called attributivizers. Specifically, we demonstrate a contrast between two types of nominals: accusative direct objects, possessors in ezafe-3, and complements of certain attributivizers share properties that contrast them with unmarked direct objects, possessors in ezafe-2, and complements of other attributivizers. We argue that postulating the DP projection in the former but not the latter type of noun phrases allows us to account for these observed correlations in a unified way.


Dans cet article, nous reconsidérons l’hypothèse selon laquelle les langues sans articles ont des projections SD. En particulier, nous nous intéressons au cas du tatar. Nous soutenons que les corrélations putatives entre la présence/absence d’articles dans une langue et autres phénomènes liés au SD (par exemple l’extraction d’une branche gauche, la supériorité, parmi d’autres), présentées par Bošković et Şener (2014), inter alia, n’ont plus lieu d’être lorsqu’on considère un plus grand nombre de langues. Nous démontrons qu’il existe certaines corrélations entre la structure interne, la position syntaxique, le cas et l’interprétation des SN dans différents contextes syntaxiques: les objets directs, les possesseurs, et les compléments des attributiviseurs. En particulier, nous montrons un contraste entre deux types de noms: les objets directs accusatifs, les possesseurs en ezafe-3 et les compléments de certains attributiviseurs partagent des propriétés qui les distinguent des objets directs sans cas, les possesseurs en ezafe-2 et les compléments d’autres attributiviseurs. La solution proposée donnant une projection SD pour le premier type de nominaux mais pas pour le deuxième nous permet d’expliquer ces corrélations observées.



Hide All
Abayev, Vassiliy I. 1959. Grammaticheskij ocherk osetinskogo jazyka [Grammatical description of the Ossetian language}. Ordzhonikidze: Severo-Osetinskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo. English translation available online: http://ironau.ra/ocherk/.
Abney, Steven Paul. 1987. The English noun phrase and its sentential aspect. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane, and Stavrou, Melita. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Aljović, Nadira. 2002. Long adjectival inflection and specificity in Serbo-Croatian. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 31:27-42.
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 1997. Lithuanian grammar. Vilnius: Baltos Lankos.
Bailyn, John Frederick. 1994. The syntax and semantics of Russian long and short adjectives: An X’-theoretic account. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics; The Ann Arbor Meeting: Functional Categories in Slavic Syntax, ed. Toman, Jindrich, 1-30. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baker, Mark. 2003. Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, Mark. 2009. Is head movement still needed for noun incorporation? Lingua 119:148-165.
Baker, Mark. 2013. On alignment types and types of Differential Object Marking. Paper presented at the Tromsø Conference on Differential Object Marking.
Baker, Mark and Vinokurova, Nadya. 2010. Two modalities of Case assignment: Case in Sakha. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28:593-642.
Beaver, David. 2013. Definiteness and determinacy. Paper presented at the Stanford Linguistics Colloquium, November 2013.
Bittner, Maria. 1994. Case, scope and binding. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bošković, Željko. 2005. On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59:1—45.
Bošković, Željko. 2008. What will you have, DP or NP? In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. Elfner, Emily and Walkow, Martin, 101-114. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Bošković, Željko 2009. More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica 63:187-203.
Bošković, Željko 2010. On NPs and clauses. Ms., University of Connecticut.
Bošković, Željko and Gajewski, Jon. 2011. Semantic correlates of the DP/NP parameter. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. Lima, Suzi, Mullin, Kevin, and Smith, Brian, 121-134. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Bošković, Željko and Şener, Serkan. 2014. The Turkish NP. In Crosslinguistic studies on noun phrase structure and reference, ed. Hofherr, Patricia Cabredo and Zribi-Hertz, Anne, 102-140. Leiden: Brill.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In Events and grammar, ed. Rothstein, Susan, 53-103. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chung, Sandra and Ladusaw, William. 2004. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1994. Evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne, ed. Cinque, Guglielmo, Koster, Jan, Pollock, Jean-Yves, Rizzi, Luigi, and Zanuttini, Raffaela, 85-110. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Corver, Norbert. 1992. Left branch extraction. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. Broderick, Kimberley, 67-84. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Dayal, Veneeta. 2007. Hindi pseudo incorporation. Ms., Rutgers University. Available online:
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993. The internal structure of noun phrases in the Scandinavian Languages. Lund: Lund University Press.
Despić, Miloje. 2011. Syntax in the absence of determiner phrase. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
E. Kiss, Katalin. 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó/Dordrecht: Reidel.
E. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Englehardt, Miriam and Tragman, Helen. 1998. D as a source of adnominal genitive in Russian. In Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Connecticut meeting 1997, ed. Boskovic, Željko, Franks, Steven and Snyder, William, 114-133. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Englehardt, Miriam and Tragman, Helen. 2000. Double genitive constructions in Russian. In Comparative Slavic morphosyntax, ed. Fowler, George. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers.
Farkas, Donka. 1986. The syntactic position of focus in Hungarian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4:77-96.
Fu, Jingqi, Roeper, Thomas, and Borer, Hagit. 2001. The VP within nominalizations: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do-so. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19:549-582.
Gécseg, Zsuzsanna and Kiefer, Ferenc. 2009. A new look at information structure in Hungarian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27:583-622.
van Geenhoven, Veerle. 1998. Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions: Semantic and syntactic aspects of West Greenlandic noun incorporation. (Dissertations in Linguistics.) Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Grashchenkov, Pavel. 2007. Izafetnaja konstruktsija: Mnogofaktornyj analiz [Ezafe construction: Multifactorial analysis]. In Misharskij dialect tatarskogo jazyka: Ocherkipo sintaksisu i semantike [Miŧär dialect of Tatar: Essays on syntax and semantics], 83-114. Kazan’: Magarif.
Hazout, Ilan. 1990. Verbal nouns: Theta-theoretic studies in Hebrew and Arabic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Hazout, Ilan. 1995. Action nominalization and the Lexicalist Hypothesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13:355-404.
Van Hofwegen, Janneke. 2013. Extraction or splitting? How A’ movement phenomena in Lithuanian can shed light on the syntax-phonology interface and the NP-DP debate. Ms., Stanford University.
Horvath, Julia. 1986. FOCUS in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris.
Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kagan, Olga and Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2011. Syntax and semantics of bare NPs: Objects of intensive reflexive verbs in Russian. In Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 8, ed. Bonami, Olivier and Hofherr, Patricia Cabredo, 221-238.
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ketrez, Nihan. 2005. Children’s scope of indefinite objects. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1984. Case marking, agreement, and empty categories in Turkish. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2001. Functional projections and their subjects in Turkish clauses. In The verb in Turkish, ed. Erguvanli-Taylan, Eser, 183-212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2003. Subject case in Turkish nominalized clauses. In Syntactic structures and morphological information, ed. Junghanns, Uwe and Szusich, Luka, 129-215. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Levin, Theodore and Preminger, Omer. 2015. Case in Sakha: Are two modalities really necessary? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33:231-250.
Lewis, Geoffrey L. 1967. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 25:609-665.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2000. How comparative is semantics? Paper presented at the Antwerp NP/DP Conference.
Lyutikova, Ekaterina. 2010. К voprosu o kategoriaľnom statuse imennyx grupp v rasskom yazyke [On the syntactic category of Russian noun phrases]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, series 9 “Philology” 6:36-77.
Lyutikova, Ekaterina. 2014. Russkij genetivnyj possessor i formal’nye modeli imennoj gruppy [Russian genitive possessor and formal models of the noun phrase]. In Tipologija morfosintaksicheskix parametrov 2014.: Proceedings, ed. Lyutikova, Ekaterina A., Zimmerling, Anton V., Konoshenko, Maria B., 121-145. Moscow: MGGU.
Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL 8), ed. Westphal, German, Ao, Benjamin, and Chae, Hee-Rahk, 234-253. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Marušič, Franc and Zaucer, Rok. 2013. A definite article in the AP—Evidence from colloquial Slovenian. In Nominal constructions in Slavic and beyond, ed. Schrücks, Lilia, Etxeberria, Urtzi, Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Kosta, Peter, 183-208. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Massam, Diane. 2001. Pseudo incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19:153-197.
Massam, Diane. 2009. Noun incorporation: Essentials and extensions. Language and Linguistics Compass 3/4:1076-1096.
Megerdoomian, Karine. 2008. Some bare nouns are more equal than others. Paper presented at the USC Student Workshop, May 2008.
Merchant, Jason. 2009. Polyvalent case, geometric hierarchies, and split ergativity. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 42), ed. Bunting, Jackie, Desai, Sapna, Peachey, Robert, Straughn, Chris and Tomkova, Zuzana, 57-76. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60:847-895.
Mithun, Marianne. 1986. On the nature of noun incorporation. Language 62:32-38.
Munn, Alan. 1995. The possessor that stayed close to home. In Proceedings of WECOL 24, ed. Samiian, Vida, 181-195. Department of Linguistics, Fresno State University.
Pazelskaya, Anna and Tatevosov, Sergei. 2003. Nominalization in Russian: Eventuality types and aspectual properties. Paper presented at the 10th European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages (FDSL-10), Slavic Department, University of Leipzig.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2000. Monotonicity-based vs. veridicality-based approaches to negative polarity: Evidence from Russian. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, ed. King, Tracy Holloway and Sekerina, Irina A., 328-346. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2001. Syntactic categories are neither primitive nor universal: Evidence from short and long adjectives in Russian. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Bloomington Meeting 2000., ed. Franks, Steven, King, Tracy Holloway, and Yadroff, Michael, 209-227. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2006a. Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24:433-500.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2006b. Head movement in Hebrew nominalis: A reply to Shlonsky. Lingua 116(8):A1-A40.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2007a. On the universality of DP: A view from Russian. Studia Linguistica 61:59-94.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2007b. Copular sentences in Russian: A theory of intra-clausal relations. Dordrecht: Springer.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2008. Split phrases in Colloquial Russian. Studia Linguistica 62:5-38.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2013a. Noun phrase structure in article-less Slavic languages: DP or not DP? Language and Linguistics Compass 7:201-219.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2013b. On number and numberlessness in languages without articles. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. Cathcart, Chundra, Chen, I-Hsuan, Finley, Greg, Kang, Shinae, Sandy, Clare S., and Stickles, Elise, 300-314. Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2015. The functional structure of the nominal domain. In Contemporary Linguistic Parameters, ed. Fábregas, Antonio, Putnam, Mike & Mateu, Jaume, 303-331. London: Bloomsbury.
Pereltsvaig, Asya and Kagan, Olga. 2011. Adjectives in layers. Ms., Stanford University / Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
Pereltsvaig, Asya and Lyutikova, Ekaterina. 2014. Possessives within and beyond NP: Two ezafe-constructions in Tatar. In Advances in the syntax of DPs: Structure, agreement, and case, ed. Bondarak, Anna, Dalmi, Grete, and Grosu, Alex, 193-220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Progovac, Ljiljiana. 1998. Determiner phrase in a language without determiners. Journal of Linguistics 34:165-179.
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1992. Cross-linguistic evidence for number phrase. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37:197-218.
Rubin, Edward. 1994. Modification: A syntactic analysis and its consequences. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Rutkowski, Pawel. 2002. Noun/pronoun asymmetries: Evidence in support of the DP hypothesis in Polish. Jezikoslovlje 3:159-170.
Rutkowski, Pawel. 2007. The Determiner Phrase hypothesis as a tool of syntactic analysis of Polish nominal phrases. Doctoral dissertation, Warsaw University.
Suoni, Tal. 1996. Hebrew verbal gerunds. In Studies in Afroasiatic grammar, ed. Lecarme, Jacqueline, Loewenstam, J., and Shlonsky, Ur, 410—430. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
Suoni, Tal. 1997. Noun phrases and nominalizations: The syntax ofDPs. (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 40.) Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Stolz, Thomas. 2010. Pleonastic morphology dies hard: Change and variation of defmiteness inflection in Lithuanian. In Variation and change in morphology: Selected papers from the 13th International Morphology Meeting, ed. Ranier, Franz, Dressier, Wolfgang U., Kastovsky, Dieter, and Luschützky, Hans Christian, 217-244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1983. The possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review 3:89-102.
Trenkic, Danijela. 2004. Defmiteness in Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian and some implications for the general structure of the nominal phrase. Lingua 114:1401—1427.
Trugman, Helen. 2005a. More puzzles about postnominal genitives. In Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax, ed. Kim, Ji-yung, Lander, Yury A., and Partee, Barbara H., 217-240. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Trugman, Helen. 2005b. Rudiments of Romance N-to-D movement in Russian. In Potsdam linguistic investigations: Linguistic investigations into formal description of Slavic languages, ed. Kosta, Peter, Hassler, Gerda, Shurcks, Lilia, and Thielemann, Nadine, 411-426. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Trugman, Helen. 2007. Possessives within and beyond NPs. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, ed. Compton, Richard, Goledzinowska, Magdalena, and Savchenko, Ulyana, 437-457. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Willim, Ewa. 2000. On the grammar of Polish nominals. In Step by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Martin, Roger, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan, 319-346. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zakiev, Mirfatykh. 1995. Tatarskaya grammatika, Tom III: Sintaksis [Tatar grammar, vol. 3: Syntax]. Kazan: Akademiya Nauk Tatarstana.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The Tatar DP

  • Ekaterina Lyutikova (a1) and Asya Pereltsvaig


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.