Skip to main content


  • Access
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    El Beheiry, Hossam 2019. Co-existing Diseases and Neuroanesthesia. p. 15.

    Kisilevsky, A. Gelb, A.W. Bustillo, M. and Flexman, A.M. 2018. Anaemia and red blood cell transfusion in intracranial neurosurgery: a comprehensive review. British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 120, Issue. 5, p. 988.

    Bagwe, Shefali Chung, Lawrance K. Lagman, Carlito Voth, Brittany L. Barnette, Natalie E. Elhajjmoussa, Lekaa and Yang, Isaac 2017. Blood transfusion indications in neurosurgical patients: A systematic review. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, Vol. 155, Issue. , p. 83.

    Rosique, Rodrigo G. Rosique, Marina J. F. and Rabelo, Mariana Quintino 2017. Does Postoperative Erythropoietin Reduce Transfusions and Hemodynamic Instability Following Liposuction, Either Alone or Associated with Abdominoplasty or Mammaplasty? A Comparative, Prospective Study of 50 Consecutive Patients. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 98.

    Marsili, Angela Puorro, Giorgia Pane, Chiara de Rosa, Anna Defazio, Giovanni Casali, Carlo Cittadini, Antonio de Michele, Giuseppe Florio, Brunello Ettore Filla, Alessandro and Saccà, Francesco 2017. Stability of erythropoietin repackaging in polypropylene syringes for clinical use. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 290.

    Saccà, Francesco Puorro, Giorgia Marsili, Angela Antenora, Antonella Pane, Chiara Casali, Carlo Marcotulli, Christian Defazio, Giovanni Liuzzi, Daniele Tatillo, Chiara Cambriglia, Donata Maria Schiano di Cola, Giuseppe Giuliani, Luigi Guardasole, Vincenzo Salzano, Andrea Ruvolo, Antonio De Rosa, Anna Cittadini, Antonio De Michele, Giuseppe and Filla, Alessandro 2016. Long-term effect of epoetin alfa on clinical and biochemical markers in friedreich ataxia. Movement Disorders, Vol. 31, Issue. 5, p. 734.

    Hamilton, Mark G. 2014. Mitigating the Risks of Blood Loss in Neurosurgery Patients. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Vol. 41, Issue. 5, p. 545.



      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Blood Conservation in Neurosurgery: Erythropoietin and Autologous Donation
        Available formats
        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Blood Conservation in Neurosurgery: Erythropoietin and Autologous Donation
        Available formats
        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Blood Conservation in Neurosurgery: Erythropoietin and Autologous Donation
        Available formats
Export citation



Neurosurgery may involve significant blood loss and frequently requires allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Preoperative recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) may be used to improve erythroid status and recovery, and used either alone or in combination with preoperative autologous donation (PAD) it may reduce exposure to allogeneic RBC. We wished to study the use of EPO with and without PAD and the risk of RBC transfusion in neurosurgery.


Using a retrospective case-control design, 57 patients who received EPO preoperatively were matched 2:1 for age, sex, year of surgery, and International Classification of Diseases code most responsible for surgery (three were excluded because of stringent matching criteria, leaving 54 cases and 108 comparison subjects). Thirty-two cases participated in PAD. Medical and anesthetic records as well as laboratory investigations were reviewed and extracted.


Allogeneic RBC exposure was identical for EPO cases and comparison subjects (18.5%). Concomitant PAD and EPO did not reduce allogeneic RBC exposure (21.9%), and resulted in a greater number of RBC units transfused. Last recorded hemoglobin levels suggested that autologous RBCs were not more liberally used. Patients who engaged in PAD and EPO suffered from iatrogenic anemia. A significant proportion (58.6%) of the autologous RBCs was ultimately not used and discarded.


Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of EPO in neurological surgery. PAD does not appear to reduce the risk of allogeneic RBC transfusion, despite concomitant EPO. Indeed, PAD resulted in iatrogenic anemia and increased transfusion requirements. The cost-effectiveness of blood conservation efforts in neurosurgery deserves additional research.

The advent of modern transfusion medicine improved surgical survival and morbidity; however, the legacy of transfusion-related blood-borne infections lingers in public perception. Although the implementation of strategies to avoid transfusion were once an infrequent occurrence limited to populations such as Jehovah’s Witnesses or individuals with rare antibodies, individuals preparing for surgery are increasingly likely to ask to avoid transfusion. 1

The safety of allogeneic blood products is constantly improving. Yet, despite improved donor screening and testing, the risk of viral infection remains. 1 The risks also include noninfectious complications such as hemolysis from clerical errors, lung injuries, and volume overload. 2 Although transfusions requirements may reflect more challenging surgical cases or an increased burden of disease, they have been shown to be associated with worse outcomes in perioperative patients including postoperative infections, most typically pneumonia and bacteremia, 3 and increased length of stay. 1 In addition to rigorous transfusion protocols, surgical planning and optimized intraoperative hemostasis, there are several approaches to limit blood loss and avoid allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, including diagnosis and management of preoperative anemia, use of hemostatic medications, normovolemic hemodilution, controlled hypotensive anesthesia, salvaging and reinfusing RBCs lost intraoperatively, and preoperative RBC donation through preoperative autologous donation (PAD). 1

An additional method to manage anemia and hasten erythroid recovery is to use erythroid-stimulating agents such as erythropoietin (EPO). The advent of recombinant erythropoietic-stimulating agents provided a mechanism for improving erythroid status in many settings, including renal disease, myelodysplastic syndromes, and anemia of chronic disease. 4 When used to prevent perioperative allogeneic blood products, meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials indicate that recombinant erythropoiesis-stimulating agents reduce allogeneic RBC transfusion in cardiovascular 5 , 6 and orthopedic surgeries. 6 Furthermore, when used in conjunction with PAD, recombinant erythropoiesis-stimulating agents reduce the risk of allogeneic transfusion in orthopedic and cardiovascular surgeries. 5 - 7

Early experience in neurological surgery with recombinant EPO to avoid RBC transfusion involved successful use in Jehovah’s Witnesses in both spine 8 and intracranial cases. 9 , 10 There was a prospective open-label randomized control trial of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in spinal surgery 11 ; however, to our knowledge, there are limited data on its use in nonspinal neurological surgeries.

Although meta-analyses have shown that PAD reduces exposure to allogeneic RBC, it also results in an increased exposure to transfusion when both autologous and allogeneic RBCs are considered, 12 most likely because of iatrogenic anemia. It is unknown whether this is a consideration when planning blood conservation efforts in neurosurgery.

The Ontario Transfusion Coordinators (ONTraC) Provincial Blood Conservation program is involved in patient blood management efforts in 27 sites across Ontario, Canada. This program seeks to minimize the use of allogeneic blood products through various techniques, including management of anemia with EPO and PAD. The program specifically targets certain surgical procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting and arthroplasty, but will accept referrals for patients undergoing other surgeries.

The aim of this study was to characterize RBC transfusion requirements among neurosurgical patients who received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with PAD and without versus comparison subjects who were matched for age, sex, and preoperative diagnosis.


This study was approved by the St-Michael’s Hospital Research Ethics board. This was a retrospective case control study. No mention of patient status as a Jehovah’s Witness was identified in any of the cases studied.



The ONTraC program was launched in 2002 with the aim of minimizing unnecessary use of allogeneic blood products. It coordinates patient blood management programs in institutions of all sizes in Ontario. ONTraC’s targeted procedures include total knee and hip arthroplasty/replacement, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and radical prostatectomy. ONTraC nurses also consider referrals for patients undergoing other surgical procedures.

Between 2002 and 2009, 420 patients received recombinant EPO preoperatively through the ONTraC program at St-Michael’s Hospital. Fifty-seven of these were neurosurgical patients and were retained in the current study. International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes for the preoperative diagnosis were extracted for all cases to permit comparison subject matching (Table 1). Ultimately, three cases were not included in the final analyses (encephalocele n=1, cerebral cyst n=2) because comparison subjects could not be identified that respected our matching protocol.

Table 1 Preoperative diagnoses

ICD=International Classification of Diseases.

Blood Conservation

Cases received iron supplementation and an average of 2.44±1.00 40,000 IU subcutaneous doses of EPO preoperatively. Recombinant EPO for the purposes of blood conservation is not covered under Canadian socialized health care; therefore, the costs of the treatment were covered by insurance providers (n=27, 47.3%), the patients themselves (n=13, 22.8%), compassionate access program (n=8, 14.0%), or by the Ontario Drug Benefit program (n=9, 15.7%). Concomitant to receiving EPO, 32 (59.2%) cases also elected to participate in a preoperative autologous donation program. The patients donated an average of 1.78±1.13 whole blood units (range 1-3 units); one patient donated 3 units twice because of rescheduling.

Comparison Subjects

Controls were identified through the St-Michael’s Hospital registry. Cases were matched 2:1 to comparison subjects identified among elective neurosurgical patients. To be included, comparison subjects could not be emergency cases. Cases were matched for ICD-10 preoperative diagnosis, sex, age (±3 years), and year of surgery (±3 years). ONTraC files were consulted to ensure that no comparison subject participated in blood conservation programs, including preoperative autologous RBC donation or intraoperative reinfusion. Thus, 108 matched comparison neurosurgical patients were identified and included in this study.

RBC Transfusion

Participation in the ONTraC program does not result in a mandated transfusion guideline. All decisions to proceed to RBC transfusions were managed by the patients’ most responsible physician as clinically indicated. This is unlikely to have resulted in any systematic biases with respect to transfusions.

Data Extraction

Patients’ charts were reviewed for information pertaining to preoperative diagnosis, age, and sex. Preoperative neurosurgical, medical, and anesthesia consultations were reviewed for comorbidities—specifically hematological, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, and cardiovascular—and medications, including antiplatelet and anticoagulant use. Laboratory values, namely hemoglobins and platelet counts, were extracted when available.

The primary outcome for this study was allogeneic RBC transfusion. Secondary outcomes were RBC units transfused and perioperative hemoglobins, particularly day-of-surgery hemoglobins. Additional analyses are presented for relevant laboratory values.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS v19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). For categorical variables, we used chi-square tests (with odds ratio and 95% confidence interval). For continuous variables, we used Student-t test or analysis of variance. Significance was set at α≤0.05.


Demographic and clinical characteristics of EPO cases, subdivided according to PAD, and comparison subjects are presented in Table 2. Cases and controls were of identical sex distribution (24.1% male, 75.9% female) and comparable age (50.31±13.78 vs 50.83±14.15). Some clinical differences emerged: cases who received EPO without PAD were more likely to have comorbid diabetes mellitus, and preoperative hemoglobin was lower for cases that received EPO both with and without autologous predonation. Of note, the difference between patients who did not receive any blood conservation measures versus those who received EPO alone the difference in preoperative hemoglobins was about 10 g/L. Cases were otherwise comparable with respect to medical comorbidities, anticoagulant, and antiplatelet use.

Table 2 Demographic and clinical features

Hb=hemoglobin; M=mean; Plts=platelets; RBC=red blood cell; SD=standard deviation.

Surgical matching was also achieved, with spinal surgeries involving comparable number of levels (2.58±0.79 vs 2.20±0.76 levels, p≥0.19). Similarly, mean tumor volume did not differ between groups (29.16±34.71 vs 28.85±43.17 cm3, p≥0.97).

Allogeneic RBC Transfusion

Cases and controls did not differ with respect to exposure to allogeneic RBCs (Figure 1a), and an identical proportion (18.5%) were exposed to allogeneic RBCs. Similarly, they did not differ with respect to the number of allogeneic units transfused (Figure 2a; F(2, 161)=0.34, p≥0.70). When distinguishing cases that received EPO and predonated blood, no difference in exposure to allogeneic RBCs was noted (Figure 1b; χ2=1.61, df=2, p≥0.44). Cases that required an allogeneic transfusion did not differ from patients who did not with respect to the number of EPO doses received (2.50±1.26 vs 2.43±0.94, p≥0.84).

Figure 1 Proportion of patients exposed to allogeneic RBC units subdivided according to (a) whether or not they received EPO and (b) whether they received EPO in conjunction with PAD or not. In (c), the proportion of patients who engaged in PAD and received EPO who required RBC transfusion (allogeneic and autologous). ***p≤0.001.

Figure 2 Mean allogeneic RBC requirements for (a) patients who received EPO and comparison subjects, (b) subdivided EPO patients into those who also engaged in PAD or did not, and (c) the total RBC transfusion requirements (allogeneic and autologous) for patients with PAD and EPO. *p≤0.05.

Recombinant EPO and PAD

Because 32 (59.2%) of cases concomitantly participated in preoperative EPO and PAD, we also considered autologous RBC transfusion. When considering all units of RBCs transfused, cases who received EPO and predonated autologous RBCs were more likely to have been transfused (Figure 1c; 46.9%; χ2=13.39, df=2, p≤0.001) and have received a greater number of RBC units (Figure 2b; F(2, 161)=3.77, p≤0.05).

We characterized cases’ hemoglobin levels before EPO and on the day of surgery (Figure 3). Analyses revealed a significant interaction between predonation status×time (F(1, 46)=6.49, p≤0.05) after controlling for the main effects of predonation status (F(1, 46)=0.87, p≥0.35) and time (F(1, 46)=3.58, p≥0.06).

Figure 3 Hemoglobin prerecombinant erythropoietin and preoperatively. *p≤0.05.

Cases that concomitantly participated in preoperative autologous donation did not receive a different number of EPO doses than patients who did not (2.56±0.98 vs 2.27±1.03 t(52)=1.04, p=0.30). Of these cases, 15 (46.9%) were transfused autologous RBCs. Ultimately, 58.6% of the autologous units donated (34 units) were not transfused and were discarded.

Transfusion Threshold

Because participation in ONTRaC does not involve mandated transfusion guidelines and PAD RBCs may be viewed as more benign, we examined the final hemoglobins for our transfused cases and comparison subjects as proxies for transfusion threshold. There were no differences between patients who had received transfusions belonging to the EPO group (99.66±13.86 g/L), the EPO with PAD group (98.73±10.57 g/L), or the comparison group (103.33±13.36 g/L; F(2, 35)=.59, p≥0.55).


Using a case-control design, our analyses suggest that PAD does not reduce the risk of allogeneic RBC transfusion in neurological surgery, despite having been used in conjunction with EPO. Indeed, PAD was associated with an increase in transfusion requirements when both allogeneic and autologous RBCs are considered. Our data suggest that PAD resulted in patients going into surgery with lower hemoglobin levels, and therefore that autologous donation rendered patients anemic despite the concomitant use of EPO. Indeed, without reducing the risk of exposure to allogeneic RBC, concomitant EPO and PAD resulted in a greater number of total RBC units transfused. These findings are in keeping with systematic reviews and meta-analyses demonstrating that PAD is associated with lower preoperative hemoglobin levels 13 and increases the risk of any transfusion. 12 , 13

Although our analyses cast doubt on the utility of PAD, our data cannot determine whether EPO used in isolation is effective at reducing allogeneic RBC exposure in neurosurgery. We recommend careful selection of patients for patient blood management; these should include patients with preoperative anemia and cases associated with a significant risk of blood loss and thus allogeneic transfusion, patients objecting to transfusions, and perhaps those for whom it may be difficult to find compatible RBCs.

Further, there are counterbalanced data suggesting that recombinant EPO is not without risk. The oncology literature suggests that chronic use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents is associated with poorer long-term survival 4 , 14 ; however, this remains controversial. 15 , 16 Adverse events associated with chronic use of EPO include hypertension, thromboembolism, and iron deficiency. 17 When given acutely, as in blood conservation programs, the risk of each of these drops significantly, yet the risk of thromboembolism remains elevated (3-9%). 6 , 17 , 18 As such, the risks may not be counterbalanced in light of limited benefit of EPO, and additional research is required to justify the use of such agents because they may expose neurosurgical patients to unnecessary harm.

Although the individual and societal value of avoiding allogeneic blood products should not be minimized, the utility of PAD and EPO in neurosurgery to prevent allogeneic RBC transfusion should be carefully evaluated. Although efficacy has been well demonstrated in surgeries with a high risk for RBC transfusion—such as cardiac surgery where transfusion rates are approximately 40% 19 but approach 90% in some samples 20 —rates of transfusion in neurological surgery are far lower, between 2% and 25%. 21 , 22 Intrinsically, the possible absolute risk reduction will be constrained by a floor effect in surgeries with a lower risk of RBC transfusion; therefore, the ability to demonstrate the efficacy of blood conservation strategies in neurological surgery will be limited. Our results suggest that PAD and EPO may not be equally effective across surgical interventions. Indeed, EPO has not been demonstrated effective in colorectal cancer surgery, 23 and the same may be true in neurological surgery.

Considering the low likelihood of requiring a transfusion in neurosurgery, PAD may not be warranted. PAD may be associated with increased risk of adverse events during donation as compared with allogeneic donation. 24 PAD is associated with increased risk of requiring any transfusion 12 , 13 and does not eliminate the risk of transfusion complications such as volume overload or acute hemolysis resulting from a clerical error. The increased transfusion requirements of neurosurgical patients undergoing PAD was demonstrated even in conjunction with EPO, which highlights the need for further research into the benefit of PAD in neurosurgery.

We could not identify the reasons for which patients elected to participate in blood conservation strategies; no cases self-identified as Jehovah’s Witness. Analyses examining pre-EPO hemoglobins suggest that preoperative anemia may have been the primary reason among those who did not participate in PAD, whereas personal preference may explain those who did. Indeed, 17 patients received recombinant EPO that was specially funded by the Ontario Drug Benefit program or through compassionate use to treat low hemoglobin. These same 17 patients did not, then, donate autologous RBC; because of their low hemoglobin levels, they were not deemed to be candidates for PAD. With our data, it is not possible to conclude that preoperative erythropoietin did not optimize erythroid status and hasten postoperative erythroid recovery and thereby prevent blood transfusions in these patients.

Economic Cost-Benefit

The economic cost-benefit analysis of preoperative EPO and autologous donation in neurosurgery deserves discussion. Canadian Blood Services reports the cost of an RBC unit to be $367 CAD, 25 including collection and testing. However, the activity-based cost of transfusing an RBC unit is closer to $760 CAD. 26 Autologous blood must undergo the same infectious disease and pretransfusion testing as allogeneic blood. However, about two-thirds of autologous units are routinely discarded (Pavenski, personal communication, 2013) suggesting that the true cost of producing an autologous unit is in fact much higher compared with an allogeneic one. At the same time, the Ontario Drug Benefit formulary lists recombinant EPO alfa 40,000 IU at $450 CAD per dose.

In light of these costs, neurosurgical cases in the current study received recombinant erythropoietin at a mean cost of $1098, before administration costs. Cases participating in autologous predonation did so at a mean cost of $1352.80 CAD. Most important, whether EPO was used in isolation (representing 40.8% of the sample) or in conjunction with PAD (59.2% of the sample; mean per capita cost $2504.80), it did not reduce the absolute risk of receiving allogeneic RBC, nor did it reduce the number of allogeneic RBC units transfused compared with comparison subjects matched for age, sex, and preoperative diagnosis; with comparable tumor burden or number of spinal levels; and medical comorbidities.

Under Canadian transfusion standards, autologous units cannot cross over into the general blood inventory because autologous blood collection does not involve the rigorous screening of donors for potential exposures required for allogeneic blood. If unused, autologous units can only be discarded. Almost 60% of the autologous RBC units in this cohort were ultimately disposed of, at a cost exceeding $25,000.


This study is subject to limitations inherent in retrospective case-control designs; nevertheless, we used strict matching criteria and achieved a comparison population with similar demographic and clinical characteristics. Unfortunately, because of our strict matching procedure, three cases were not retained in the final analyses because comparison patients could not be identified. Moreover, we could not, by design, control for the surgeons and anesthetists who were involved in the surgeries. Similarly, we did not capture operative duration and this should be addressed in future studies. Although we matched according to ICD-10 codes and achieved similar tumour burden, we cannot definitely rule out more vascular lesions among our cases, and angiographic characterization should be considered in future studies.

A major limitation of our study is that cases and controls were not matched for hemoglobins, and this methodological shortcoming may have influenced our results. Further, because RBC transfusions were initiated according to the clinical judgment of the patient’s most responsible physician, additional research should include a standardized transfusion protocol that controls for this potential confound. Although the use of final hemoglobin as a proxy for transfusion thresholds suggests the absence of bias and that autologous RBCs were not viewed as a more benign intervention, we cannot definitively exclude this possibility. Another limitation is that our data did not systematically capture adverse events that may have been related to PAD or EPO.


In this cohort of patients undergoing neurological surgery, preoperative EPO did not result in a lower rate of allogeneic RBC transfusion. When used in conjunction with preoperative autologous donation, it similarly did not reduce the risk of allogeneic RBC transfusion or the number of transfused allogeneic units. Our data do not address whether EPO used in isolation reduces the risk of exposure to allogeneic RBCs; analyses revealed that our patients who received EPO but did not engage in PAD nevertheless went into surgery with a 10 g/L hemoglobin deficit compared with controls without a corresponding increase in transfusion requirements. The utility of PAD and EPO in neurological surgery is deserving of additional research using randomized prospective designs, as the non-neglible cost and side-effect profile of these strategies require sound evidence to justify their implementation in neurosurgery.


We thank Alanna Howell, Anna Nassis, and Katherine Luke, Ontario Transfusion Coordinators nurses at St-Michael’s Hospital, for their blood conservation efforts and support of this research.


1. Spahn, DR, Goodnough, LT. Alternatives to blood transfusion. Lancet. 2013;381(9880):1855-1865.
2. Goodnough, LT. Risks of blood transfusion. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(12 Suppl):S678-S686.
3. Horvath, KA, Acker, MA, Chang, H, et al. Blood transfusion and infection after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(6):2194-2201.
4. Bohlius, J, Schmidlin, K, Brillant, C, et al. Recombinant human erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and mortality in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2009;373(9674):1532-1542.
5. Alghamdi, AA, Albanna, MJ, Guru, V, Brister, SJ. Does the use of erythropoietin reduce the risk of exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion in cardiac surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg. 2006;21(3):320-326.
6. Laupacis, A, Fergusson, D. Erythropoietin to minimize perioperative blood transfusion: a systematic review of randomized trials. The International Study of Peri-operative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators. Transfus Med. 1998;8(4):309-317.
7. Shapiro, GS, Boachie-Adjei, O, Dhawlikar, SH, Maier, LS. The use of Epoetin alfa in complex spine deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(18):2067-2071.
8. Joseph, SA Jr., Berekashvili, K, Mariller, MM, et al. Blood conservation techniques in spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective review of patients refusing blood transfusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(21):2310-2315.
9. Schiff, SJ, Weinstein, SL. Use of recombinant human erythropoietin to avoid blood transfusion in a Jehovah's Witness requiring hemispherectomy. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1993;79(4):600-602.
10. Kantrowitz, AB, Spallone, A, Taylor, W, Chi, TL, Strack, M, Feghali, JG. Erythropoietin-augmented isovolemic hemodilution in skull-base surgery. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1994;80(4):740-744.
11. Colomina, MJ, Bago, J, Pellise, F, Godet, C, Villanueva, C. Preoperative erythropoietin in spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2004;13 Suppl 1(1):S40-S49.
12. Forgie, MA, Wells, PS, Laupacis, A, Fergusson, D. Preoperative autologous donation decreases allogeneic transfusion but increases exposure to all red blood cell transfusion: results of a meta-analysis. International Study of Perioperative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(6):610-616.
13. Henry, DA, Carless, PA, Moxey, AJ, et al. Pre-operative autologous donation for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2(2):CD003602.
14. Harlaar, JJ, Gosselink, MP, Hop, WC, Lange, JF, Busch, OR, Jeekel, H. Blood transfusions and prognosis in colorectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2012;256(5):681-686; discussion 686-7.
15. Glaspy, J, Crawford, J, Vansteenkiste, J, et al. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in oncology: a study-level meta-analysis of survival and other safety outcomes. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(2):301-315.
16. Ludwig, H, Crawford, J, Osterborg, A, et al. Pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(17):2838-2847.
17. Singbartl, G. Adverse events of erythropoietin in long-term and in acute/short-term treatment. Clin Investig. 1994;72(6 Suppl):S36-S43.
18. Stowell, CP, Jones, SC, Enny, C, Langholff, W, Leitz, G. An open-label, randomized, parallel-group study of perioperative epoetin alfa versus standard of care for blood conservation in major elective spinal surgery: safety analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(23):2479-2485.
19. Hutton, B, Fergusson, D, Tinmouth, A, McIntyre, L, Kmetic, A, Hebert, PC. Transfusion rates vary significantly amongst Canadian medical centres. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52(6):581-590.
20. Bennett-Guerrero, E, Zhao, Y, O'Brien, SM, et al. Variation in use of blood transfusion in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2010;304(14):1568-1575.
21. Goodnough, LT, Saha, P, Hirschler, NV, Yomtovian, R. Autologous blood donation in nonorthopaedic surgical procedures as a blood conservation strategy. Vox Sang. 1992;63(2):96-101.
22. Linsler, S, Ketter, R, Eichler, H, Schwerdtfeger, K, Steudel, WI, Oertel, J. Red blood cell transfusion in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(7):1303-1308.
23. Devon, KM, McLeod, RS. Pre and peri-operative erythropoietin for reducing allogeneic blood transfusions in colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;21(1):CD007148.
24. Popovsky, MA, Whitaker, B, Arnold, NL. Severe outcomes of allogeneic and autologous blood donation: frequency and characterization. Transfusion. 1995;35(9):734-737.
25. Canadia Blood Services. Report to Canadians 2011/2012. Available from:
26. Shander, A, Hofmann, A, Ozawa, S, Theusinger, OM, Gombotz, H, Spahn, DR. Activity-based costs of blood transfusions in surgical patients at four hospitals. Transfusion. 2010;50(4):753-7765.