Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

One Versus Double Burr Holes for Treating Chronic Subdural Hematoma Meta-Analysis

  • Sirajeddin Belkhair (a1) and Gwynedd Pickett (a1)
Abstract:
Objective and Design:

There is controversy among neurosurgeons regarding whether double burr hole craniostomy (DBHC) is better than single burr hole craniostomy (SBHC) in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSH), in terms of having a lower revision rate. In order to compare the revision rates after SBHC versus DBHC, we performed a meta-analysis of the available studies in the literature.

Materials and Methods:

Multiple electronic health databases were searched to identify all the studies published between 1966 and December 2010 that compared SBHC and DBHC. Data were processed in Review Manager 5.0.18. Effect sizes were expressed in pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates, and due to heterogeneity between studies we used random effect of the inverse variance weighted method to perform the meta-analysis.

Results:

Five observational retrospective cohort studies were identified: four published studies and one unpublished, describing the outcomes of 355 DBHC and 358 SBHC to evacuate 713 CSH in 631 patients. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the revision rates between double burr hole craniostomy and single burr hole craniostomy when performed to evacuate CSH. Pooled odds ratio for all the studies was 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.26 - 1.46).

Conclusions:

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that SBHC is as good as DBHC in evacuating chronic subdural hematoma and is not associated with a higher revision rate compared to DBHC.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      One Versus Double Burr Holes for Treating Chronic Subdural Hematoma Meta-Analysis
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      One Versus Double Burr Holes for Treating Chronic Subdural Hematoma Meta-Analysis
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      One Versus Double Burr Holes for Treating Chronic Subdural Hematoma Meta-Analysis
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Sirajeddin Belkhair, QE II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax Infirmary, 3806 – 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3A7, Canada Email: sirajeeddin@hotmail.com
References
Hide All
1. Weigel, R, Schmiedek, P, Krauss, JK. Outcome of contemporary surgery for chronic subdural haematoma: evidence based review. J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Jul;74(7):937–43.
2. Kansal, R, Nadkarni, T, Goel, A. Single versus double burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematomas. A study of 267 cases. J ClinNeurosci. 2010 Apr;17(4):428–9.
3. Lee, JK, Choi, JH, Kim, CH, Lee, HK, Moon, JG. Chronic subdural hematomas: a comparative study of three types of operative procedures. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009 Sep;46(3):210–14.
4. Taussky, P, Fandino, J, Landolt, H. Number of burr holes as independent predictor of postoperative recurrence in chronic subdural haematoma. Br J Neurosurg. 2008 Apr;22(2):279–82.
5. Vignes, JR. Surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma in the adult. Review of the literature. Neurochirurgie. 2001 Nov;47(5):479–87.
6. Gelabert-Gonzalez, M, Iglesias-Pais, M, Garcia-Allut, A, Martinez-Rumbo, R. Chronic subdural haematoma: surgical treatment and outcome in 1000 cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005;107(3):223–9.
7. Cenic, A, Bhandari, M, Reddy, K. Management of chronic subdural hematoma: a national survey and literature review. Can J Neurol Sci. 2005 Nov;32(4):501–6.
8. Rohde, V, Graf, G, Hassler, W. Complications of burr-hole craniostomy and closed-system drainage for chronic subdural hematomas: a retrospective analysis of 376 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2002 Mar;25(1-2):89–94.
9. Okada, Y, Akai, T, Okamoto, K, Iida, T, Takata, H, Iizuka, H. A comparative study of the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma-burr hole drainage versus burr hole irrigation. Surg Neurol. 2002 Jun;57(6):405–9; discussion 410.
10. Lega, BC, Danish, SF, Malhotra, NR, Sonnad, SS, Stein, SC. Choosing the best operation for chronic subdural hematoma: a decision analysis. J Neurosurg. 2010 Sep;113(3):615–21.
11. Han, HJ, Park, CW, Kim, EY, Yoo, CJ, Kim, YB, Kim, WK. One vs. two burr hole craniostomy in surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009 Aug;46(2):8792.
12. Oishi, M, Toyama, M, Tamatani, S, Kitazawa, T, Saito, M. Clinical factors of recurrent chronic subdural hematoma. Neurol Med Chir. 2001 Aug;41(8):382–6.
13. Santarius, T, Kirkpatrick, PJ, Ganesan, D, Chia, HL, Jalloh, I, Smielewski, P. use of drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1067–73.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
  • ISSN: 0317-1671
  • EISSN: 2057-0155
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-neurological-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed