Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-nbrzn Total loading time: 0.314 Render date: 2021-04-19T19:38:28.052Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
Canadian Journal of Philosophy Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Article contents

Understanding Meta-Emotions: Prospects for a Perceptualist Account

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2019

Jonathan Mitchell
Jonathan Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
Corresponding
E-mail address:
jonathan.mitchell@manchester.ac.uk
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article clarifies the nature of meta-emotions, and it surveys the prospects of applying a version of the perceptualist model of emotions to them. It first considers central aspects of their intentionality and phenomenal character. It then applies the perceptualist model to meta-emotions, addressing issues of evaluative content and the normative dimension of meta-emotional experience. Finally, in considering challenges and objections, it assesses the perceptualist model, concluding that its application to meta-emotions is an attractive extension of the theory, insofar as it captures some distinctive features of meta-emotions—specifically their normative dimension—while locating them within the domain of occurrent affective experiences.

Keywords

meta-emotion emotion Perceptualism experience intentionality
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , May 2020 , pp. 505 - 523
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Barlassina, Luca., and Newen, Albert. 2014. “The Role of Bodily Perception in Emotion: In Defense of an Impure Somatic Theory.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3): 637–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, Anne., Appel, Markus, and Storch, Dennis. 2010. “Predicting Emotions and Metaemotions at the Movies.” Communication Research 37 (2): 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Michael. 2007. “Recalcitrant Emotions and Visual Illusions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (3): 273–284.Google Scholar
Brady, Michael. 2013. Emotional Insight: The Epistemic Role of Emotional Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassam, Quassim. 2007. The Possibility of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, Robert. 2016. “Epistemic Perceptualism and Neo-Sentimentalist Objections.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (1): 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Tim. 1998. “Intentionality as the Mark of the Mental.” In Contemporary Issues in the Philosophy of Mind, edited by O’Hear, Anthony, pp. 229-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deonna, Julien., and Teroni, Fabrice. 2012. The Emotions: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dokic, Jérôme Dokic., and Lemaire, Stéphane. 2015. “Are Emotions Evaluative Modes?” dialectica 69 (3): 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, Sabine. 2007. “Seeing What to Do: Affective Perception and Rational Motivation.” dialectica 61 (3): 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, Sabine. 2014. “Why Recalcitrant Emotions Are Not Irrational.” In Emotion and Value, edited by Roeser, Sabine and Todd, Cain, pp. 124–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Döring, Sabine., and Lutz, Anika. 2015. “Beyond Perceptualism: Introduction to the Special Issue” dialectica 69 (3): 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Nancy. 1996. “Metaemotion and Socialization of Emotion in the Family – A Topic Whose Time Has Come: Comment on Gottman et al. (1996).” Journal of Family Psychology 10 (3): 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul. 1999. “Basic Emotions.” In The Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, edited by Dalgleish, T. and Power, T., pp. 45–60. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Frijda, Nico. 1987. The Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldie, Peter. 2000. The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert. 1996. “Radical Simulation.” In Theories of Theories of Mind, edited by Carruthers, Peter and Smith, Peter. K., pp. 11–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Mitchell. 2007. Self-Expression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, Bennet. 2001. “Emotions and Practical Reason: Rethinking Evaluation and Motivation.” Noûs 35 (2): 190–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Scott. Alexander, . 2015. “Metaemotional Intentionality.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2):1–23.Google Scholar
Jäger, Christoph., and Bartsch, Anne. 2006. “Meta-Emotions.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1): 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Christoph., and Bänninger-Huber, Eva. 2015. “Looking into Meta-Emotions.” Synthese 192 (1): 787–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William. 1884. “What is an Emotion.” Mind 9 (34): 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Mark. 2001. “The Authority of Affect.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1): 181–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1963. Action, Emotion and Will. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koven, Nancy. 2011. “Specificity of Metaemotion Effects on Moral Decision Making.” Emotion 11 (5): 1255–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambie, John. 2009. “Emotion Experience, Rational Action, and Self-Knowledge’, in Emotion Review 1 (3): 272–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcel, Anothony., and Lambie, John. 2002. “Consciousness and the Varieties of Emotion Experience: A Theoretical Framework.” Psychological Review 109 (2): 219–259.Google Scholar
Mendonça, Dina. 2013. “Emotions about Emotions.” Emotion Review 5 (4): 390–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitmansgruber, Horst., Beck, Thomas. N., Höfer, Stefan, and Schüßler, Gerhard. 2009. “When You Don’t Like What You Feel: Experiential Avoidance, Mindfulness and Metaemotion in Emotion Regulation.” Personality and Individual Differences 46 (4): 448–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, Elisabeth., and Furnes, Bjarte. 2016. “The Concept of ‘Metaemotion’: What Is There to Learn from Research on Metacognition?” Emotion Review 8 (2): 187–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poellner, Peter. 2016. “Phenomenology and the Perceptual Model of Emotion.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 116 (3): 261–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, Jesse. (2004) Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1994. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert. 1976. The Passions. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Smith, Joel. 2018. “The Perceptibility of Emotion.” In The Ontology of Emotions, edited by Narr, Hichem and Teroni, Fabrice, pp. 130–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Edith. 1980. On the Problem of Empathy. Washington, DC: ICS Publications.Google Scholar
Stocker, Michael. 2010. “Intellectual and Other Nonstandard Emotions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, edited by Goldie, Peter, pp. 401–423. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tappolet, Christine. 2012. “Emotions, Perceptions, and Emotional Illusions.” In Perceptual Illusion: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, edited by Calabi, Clotilde, pp. 205–222. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teroni, Fabrice. 2007. “Emotions and Formal Objects.” dialectica 61 (3): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda. 2003. “Emotion and Moral Judgment.” Philosophy and the Phenomenological Research 66 (1): 104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 73
Total number of PDF views: 173 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 29th November 2019 - 19th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Understanding Meta-Emotions: Prospects for a Perceptualist Account
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Understanding Meta-Emotions: Prospects for a Perceptualist Account
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Understanding Meta-Emotions: Prospects for a Perceptualist Account
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *