Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-2qt69 Total loading time: 0.332 Render date: 2022-08-08T20:28:03.790Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Homegrown Islamist Radicalization in Canada: Process Insights from an Attitudinal Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2013

David B. Skillicorn*
Affiliation:
Queen's University
Christian Leuprecht*
Affiliation:
Royal Military College of Canada
Conrad Winn*
Affiliation:
Carleton University
*
David B. Skillicorn, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, skill@cs.queensu.ca
Christian Leuprecht, Department of Political Science and Economics, Royal Military College of Canada, PO Box 17,000, Station Forces, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, christian.leuprecht@rmc.ca
Conrad Winn, Department of Political Science, Carleton University, B640 Loeb Building, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, cwinn@compas.ca

Abstract

Abstract. Theories of radicalization make implicit predictions about variation among attitudes in the communities from which radicals are drawn. This article subjects some popular theories to empirical testing. The precise process by which individuals come to sympathize with, provide material support for or actually engage in political violence is fully comprehensible only by longitudinal analysis, but much existing work tries to reconstruct the process by looking only at one part of its outcomes: those who have become radicalized. The result is a large number of theories and mechanisms, with little compelling empirical support. A cross-sectional snapshot of an at-risk community cannot definitively support a particular theory of radicalization, but it can rule out those whose predictions about attitudes are at variance with the empirical observations. We designed a survey instrument to measure attitudes to issues widely believed to be relevant to radicalization and deployed it among Muslim communities in Ottawa. The results are remarkably inconsistent with patterns of variation in attitudes predicted by popular theories of radicalization. Instead, they show variation of attitudes along three independent dimensions: social/economic/political satisfaction/dissatisfaction, moral/religious satisfacton/dissatisfaction, and a dimension that appears to be associated with radicalization. This suggests that governments may have less policy leverage to mitigate radicalization than generally supposed.

Résumé. Les théories de la radicalisation font des prévisions implicites quant à la variation parmi les attitudes au sein des communautés dont les radicaux sont issus. Cet article soumet quelques unes des théories populaires à une vérification empirique. Le processus précis par lequel des individus sympathisent avec, appuient ou s'engagent dans la violence politique ne peut être complètement saisi que par une analyse longitudinale, bien qu'une bonne partie de la recherche à date essaie de reconstruire le processus en regardant seulement une partie de ces résultats : ceux qui sont devenus radicalisés. En conséquence, un grand nombre de théories et de mécanismes sont soutenus par peu de preuve empirique. Un aperçu transversal d'une communauté à risque ne peut pas confirmer une théorie particulière de radicalisation, mais il peut éliminer celles dont les prévisions ne se conforment pas aux observations empiriques. Nous avons conçu un instrument de sondage pour mesurer des attitudes envers des enjeux qui sont largement perçus comme se rapportant à la radicalisation et nous l'avons administré au sein de communautés musulmanes à Ottawa. Le désaccord entre les résultats et les variations des attitudes postulées par les théories de la radicalisation est remarquable. Les résultats manifestent davantage une variation des attitudes autour de trois dimensions indépendantes : l'in/satisfaction sociale/économique/politique, l'in/satisfaction morale/religieuse ainsi qu'une dimension qui semble être liée à la radicalisation. Il s'ensuit que les politiques publiques risquent d'être moins utiles aux gouvernements pour atténuer la radicalisation que ce qui est généralement supposé.

Type
Research Note/Note de recherche
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apuzzo, Matthew and Goldman, Adam. 2011. “With CIA help, NYPD moves covertly in Muslim areas.” Associated Press, 23 August. http://www.ap.org/Content/AP-in-the-News/2011/With-CIA-help-NYPD-moves-covertly-in-Muslim-areas (November 17, 2012).Google Scholar
Atran, Scott. 2010. Talking to the Enemy: Faith, Brotherhood, and the (Un)making of Terrorists. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Bakker, Edwin. 2008. “Jihadi Terrorist in Europe and Global Salafi Jihadist.” In Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalization Challenge in Europe, ed. Coolsaet, Rik. Aldershot UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Jamie, Birdwell, Jonathan and King, Michael. 2010. The Edge of Violence: A radical approach to extremism. London: DEMOS. http://www.demos.co.uk/files/Edge_of_Violence_-_web.pdf?1271346195 (November 17, 2012).Google Scholar
Bell, Stewart. 2002. “Hezbollah Uses Canada as Base.” National Post, October 31: A10.Google Scholar
Bell, Stewart. 2004. Cold Terror: How Canada Nurtures and Exports Terrorism Around the World. Toronto: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bell, Stewart. 2009. “Canada May be Terror Target.” National Post, July 23.Google Scholar
Berman, Eli. 2000. “Sect, subsidy, and sacrifice: An economist's view of ultra-orthodox Jews.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 65 (3): 905–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Eli. 2009. Radical, Religious, and Violent: The New Economics of Terrorism. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Betz, David. 2008. “The virtual dimension of insurgency and counterinsurgency.” Small Wars and CounterInsurgency 19 (4): 510–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorgo, Tore and Horgan, John, eds. 2009. Walking Away from Terrorism: Individual and Collective Disengagement. Abingdon UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bower Bell, J. 2000. The IRA 1968–2000: An Analysis of a Secret Army. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Briggs, Rachel and Birdwell, Jonathan. 2009. Radicalisation among Muslims in the UK. MICROCON Policy Working Paper 7. http://www.microconflict.eu/publications/PWP7_RB_JB.pdf (November 17, 2012).Google Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2006. “On welfare and terrorism: Social welfare policies and political–economic roots of terrorism.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (2): 176203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS). 2004. Sons of the Father: The Next Generation of Islamic Extremists in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Intelligence Resource Centre.Google Scholar
Chen, Daniel L. 2010. “Club goods and group identity: Evidence from Islamic resurgence during the Indonesian financial crisis.” Journal of Political Economy 118 (2): 300–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fair, C. Christine. 2008. “Who are Pakistan's militants and their families?Terrorism and Political Violence 20 (1): 4965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golub, Gene H. and van Loan, Charles F.. 1996. Matrix Computations. 3rd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hegghammer, Thomas. 2006. “Terrorist recruitment and radicalization in Saudi Arabia.” Middle East Policy 13 (4): 3960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Bruce. 2007. “Terrorism in the West: Al-Qaeda's Role in Home-Grown Terror.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 13 (2): 9199.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Bruce. 2008. “The Myth of Grass-Roots Terrorism.” Foreign Affairs 87 (3): 133–38.Google Scholar
Horgan, John. 2005. The Psychology of Terrorism. Abingdon UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, John. 2009. Walking Away from Terrorism: Accounts of Disengagement from Radical and Extremist Movements. Abingdon UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Horgan, John. 2011. Divided We Stand: The Psychology and Strategy of Ireland's Dissident Terrorists. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horgan, John. 2012. “Interviewing the Terrorists: Reflections on Fieldwork and Implications for Psychological Research.” Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 4 (3): 195211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, John and Taylor, Max. 2011. “Disengagement, De-radicalization and the Arc of Terrorism: Future Directions for Research.” In Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalization Challenge, ed. Coolsaet, Rik. 2nd ed. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Brian M. 2010. Would-Be Warriors: Incidents of Jihadist Radicalization in the United States since September 11, 2001. Santa Monica CA: RAND, OP-292-OC.Google Scholar
Jolliffe, I.T. 2002. Principal Component Analysis. Series in Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
King, Michael and Taylor, Devon M.. 2011. “The Radicalization of Home-Grown Jihadists: A Review of Theoretical Models and Psychological Evidence.” Terrorism and Political Violence 23 (4): 602–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, Alan B. and Maleckova, Jitka. 2004. “Education, poverty and terrorism: Is there a causal connection?Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (4): 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuprecht, Christian and Winn, Conrad. 2011. What Do Muslim Canadians Want? The Clash of Interpretations and Public Opinion. Ottawa: MacDonald-Laurier Institute, True North Study Paper.Google Scholar
Li, Quan and Schaub, Drew. 2004. “Economic globalization and transnational terrorist incidents: A pooled time-series cross-sectional analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (2): 230–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Thomas Humphrey. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: The University Press.Google Scholar
McCauley, Clark, Leuprecht, Christian, Hataley, Todd, Winn, Conrad and Biswas, Bidisha. 2011. “Tracking the War of Ideas: A Poll of Ottawa Muslims.” Terrorism and Political Violence 23 (5) 804–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghissi, Haideh, Rahnema, Saeed, and Goodman, Mark J.. 2009. Diaspora by design: Muslims in Canada and beyond. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Duffy, Brandan. 2008. “Radical atmosphere: Explaining jihadist radicalization in the UK.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (1): 3742.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert. 2005. Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert and Feldman, James K.. 2010. Cutting the Fuse: The Explosion of Global Suicide Terrorism and How to Stop it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Global Attitudes Project. 2006. The great divide: How Westerners and Muslims view each other. http://pewrsr.ch/VSmLAx. (April 15, 2013).Google Scholar
Precht, Tomas. 2007. Home Grown Terrorism and Islamist Radicalization in Europe. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Riddell-Dixon, Elizabeth. 2008. “Assessing the Impact of Recent Immigration Trends on Canadian Foreign Policy.” In The World in Canada: Diaspora, Demography and Domestic Politics, eds. Carment, David and Bercuson, David. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Sageman, Marc. 2004. Universtanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvaia Press.Google Scholar
Sageman, Marc. 2008. Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silber, Mitchell D and Bhatt, Arvin. 2007. Radicalization in the West: The homegrown threat. New York: NYPD.Google Scholar
Taylor, Max. 2010. “Is Terrorism a Group Phenomenon?Aggression and Violent Behaviour 15 (2): 121–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Max and Horgan, John. 2006. “A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Psychological Process in the Development of a Terrorist.” Terrorism and Political Violence 18 (4): 585601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Max and Ramsay, Gilbert. 2010. “Violent Radical Content and the Relationship between Ideology and Behaviour: Do Counter-Narratives Matter?” In Countering Violent Extremist Narratives. The Hague: National Coordinator for Counterterrorism. http://english.nctb.nl/Images/CounteringViolentExtremistNarratives2_tcm92-259489.pdf (August 28, 2011).Google Scholar
Travis, Alan. 2008. “The making of an extremist.” The Guardian, August 20. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/aug/20/uksecurity.terrorism (November 17, 2012).Google Scholar
US White House. 2002. National security strategy of the United States. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vidino, Lorenzo. 2009. “Homegrown Jihadist Terrorism in the United States: A New and Occasional Phenomenon?Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 32 (1): 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidino, Lorenzo. 2010. Countering Radicalization in America: Lessons from Europe. Special Report. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace. http://www.usip.org/files/resources/SR262-Countering_Radicalization_in_America.pdf (August 28, 2011).Google Scholar
Waldmann, Peter. 1989. Ethnischer Radikalismus: Ursachen und Folgen gewaltsamer Minderheitenkonflikte. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilner, Alex. 2010. “Terrorism in Canada: Victims and Perpetrators.” Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 12 (3): 7299.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Skillicom Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Skillicom Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 67 KB
3
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Homegrown Islamist Radicalization in Canada: Process Insights from an Attitudinal Survey
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Homegrown Islamist Radicalization in Canada: Process Insights from an Attitudinal Survey
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Homegrown Islamist Radicalization in Canada: Process Insights from an Attitudinal Survey
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *