Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Canadian Federalism and Change in Policy Attention: A Comparison with the United Kingdom

  • Éric Montpetit (a1) and Martial Foucault (a1)
Abstract

Abstract. Federal systems empower multiple policy actors from different levels of governments. For some scholars, the disagreements arising within such a diverse group of actors create policy stalemates. Others contend instead that new ideas are more likely to arise and diffuse from such a diverse group. This article is a contribution to this scholarly debate, proposing an original contribution on policy agendas. It argues that both perspectives are useful to understanding the dynamic of policy making within federal systems. Looking at change in policy attention in Canadian and British speeches from the throne, the article argues that federalism constrains change immediately following a party turnover in government. In the following years, however, federal arrangements encourage larger changes in policy attention than arrangements where power is centralized.

Résumé. Les systèmes fédéraux rassemblent plusieurs acteurs politiques issus de différents niveaux de gouvernement. Pour certains chercheurs, l'existence de potentiels désaccords entre de tels décideurs est susceptible de créer des impasses politiques. D'autres soutiennent au contraire que les nouvelles idées sont plus susceptibles d'émerger et de se diffuser à partir d'un tel groupe diversifié. Cet article s'inscrit dans ce débat sur le fédéralisme et propose une contribution originale en termes de mise à l'agenda des politiques publiques. Il soutient que les deux perspectives sont nécessaires à la compréhension de la dynamique de l'élaboration des politiques au sein des systèmes fédéraux. En mesurant le changement de l'attention politique dans les discours du Trône canadiens et britanniques, l'article affirme que le fédéralisme freine le changement de politique immédiatement après un changement de parti au gouvernement. Au cours d'une législature, toutefois, les institutions fédérales encouragent de plus grands changements dans l'attention des politiques que dans des systèmes unitaires où le pouvoir est centralisé.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Éric Montpetit, Département de science politique, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, e.montpetit@umontreal.ca
Martial Foucault, Département de science politique, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, martial.foucault@umontreal.ca (currently a visiting scholar at Science po Paris).
References
Hide All
Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton. 1962. “The Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947–52.
Bakvis, Herman and Brown, Douglas. 2010. “Policy Coordination in Federal Systems: Comparing Intergovernmental Processes and Outcomes in Canada and the United States.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40 (3): 484507.
Bakvis, Herman and Skogstad, Grace. 2002. “Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy.” In Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, ed. Bakvis, Herman and Skogstad, Grace. Don Mills ON: Oxford University Press.
Bélanger, Éric. 2003. “Issue Ownership by Canadian Political Parties 1953–2001.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 539–58.
Blais, André, Blake, Donald E. and Dion, Stéphane. 1997. Governments, Parties and Public Sector Employees: Canada, United States, Britain and France. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
Boismenu, Gérard and Graefe, Peter. 2004. “The New Federal Tool Belt: Attempts to Rebuild the Social Policy Leadership.” Canadian Public Policy 30 (1): 7189.
Boychuk, Gerard W. 2008. National Health Insurance in the United States and Canada: Race, Territory and the Roots of Difference. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14: 6382.
Braun, Dietmar. 2000. “The Territorial Division of Power in Comparative Public Policy Research: An Assessment.” In Public Policy and Federalism, ed. Braun, Dietmar. Aldershot UK: Ashgate.
Breunig, Christian, Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Mortensen, Peter B.. 2010. “What Influences the Composition of Executive Agendas? A New Approach to Agenda Setting Dynamics.” Paper presented at the 17th Conference of the Council for European Studies, Montreal.
Broschek, Jörg. 2010. “Federalism and Political Change: Canada and Germany in Historical-Institutionalist Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (1): 124.
Cairney, Paul. 2009a. “Implementation and the Governance Problem: A Pressure Participant Perspective.” Public Policy and Administration 24 (4): 355–77.
Cairney, Paul. 2009b. “Intergovernmental Relations in Scotland before and after the SNP.” Paper prepared for the ESRC Seminar Series. Exeter, February 12–13.
Castles, Francis G. 1982. “The Impact of Parties on Public Expenditure.” In The impact of parties, ed. Castles, Francis G.. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
Clarke, Harold D., Jenson, Jane, LeDuc, Lawrence and Pammett, Jon H.. 1996. Absent Mandate: Canadian Electoral Politics in an Era of Restructuring. 3rd ed.Vancouver: Gage.
Constantelos, John. 2010. “Playing the Field: Federalism and the Politics of Venue Shopping in the United States and Canada.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40 (3): 460–83.
Dupré, J. Stefan. 1988. “Reflections on the Workability of Executive Federalism.” In Perspectives on Canadian Federalism, ed. Olling, Randy D. and Westmascott, Martin W.. Scarborough ON: Prentice-Hall Canada.
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Wilkerson, John. 2006. “How Agenda-setting Attributes Shape Politics: Problem Attention, Agenda Dynamics and Comparative Health Policy Developments in the US and Denmark.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (7): 1039–52.
Howlett, Michael. 1999. “Federalism and Public Policy.” In Canadian Politics, ed. Bickerton, James and Gagnon, Alain-G.. 3rd ed, Peterborough ON: Broadview Press.
Jennings, Will, Bevan, Shaun and John, Peter. 2011. “The British Government's Political Agenda: the Speech from the Throne, 1911–2008.” Political Studies 59 (1): 7498.
Jennings, Will, and John, Peter. 2009. “The Dynamics of Political Attention: Public Opinion and the Queen's Speech in the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 838–54.
John, Peter and Jennings, Will. 2010. “Punctuations and Turning Points in British Politics: The Policy Agenda of the Queen's Speech, 1940–2005.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 561–86.
Johns, Carolyn M., O'Reilly, Patricia L. and Inwood, Gregory J.. 2007. “Formal and Informal Dimensions of Intergovernmental Administrative Relations in Canada.” Canadian Public Administration 50 (1): 2141.
Johns, Carolyn M., O'Reilly, Patricia L. and Inwood, Gregory J.. 2006. “Intergovernmental Innovation and the Administrative State in Canada.” Governance 19 (4): 627–49.
Keating, Michael. 2002. “Devolution and Public Policy in the United Kingdom: Divergence or Convergence.” In Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences within the UK, ed. Adams, J. and Robinson, P.. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter., Hofferbert, Richard I. and Budge, Ian. 1994. Parties, policies, and democracy. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
Montpetit, Éric. 2002. “Policy Networks, Federal Arrangements and the Development of Environmental Regulations: A Comparison of the Canadian and American Agricultural Sectors.” Governance 15: 120.
Petry, François. 1988. “The Policy Impact of Canadian Party Programs: Public Expenditure Growth and Contagion from the Left.” Canadian Public Policy XIV (4): 376–89.
Petry, François, Imbeau, Louis M., Crête, Jean and Clavet, Michel. 1999. “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in the Canadian Provinces.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 32: 273–92.
Rabe, Barry G. 1999. “Federalism and Entrepreneurship: Explaining American and Canadian Innovation in Pollution Prevention and Regulatory Integration.” Policy Studies Journal 27: 288306.
Robertson, Gordon. 1988. “The Role of Interministerial Conferences in the Decision-making Process.” In Perspectives on Canadian Federalism, ed. Olling, Randy D. and Westmacott, Martin W.. Scarborough ON: Prentice-Hall Canada.
Rocher, François and Rouillard, Christian. 1998. “Décentralisation, subsidiarité et néo-libéralisme au Canada.” Canadian Public Policy 24 (2): 233–58.
Rose, Richard and Davies, Phillip L.. 1994. Inheritance in Public Policy Change without Choice in Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1988. “The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration.” Public Administration 66: 239–78.
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Simeon, Richard. 1972. Federal–Provincial Diplomacy: The Making of Recent Policy in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Simeon, Richard and Robinson, Ian. 2009. “The Dynamics of Canadian Federalism.” In Canadian Politics, ed. Bickerton, James and Gagnon, Alain-G.. 5th ed.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Soroka, Stuart and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010. “Public Opinion and Public Policy.” In Oxford Handbook of Canadian Politics, ed. Courtney, John C. and Smith, David E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stevenson, Garth. 1995. “Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations.” In Canadian Politics in the 1990s, ed. Whittington, Michael S. and Williams, Glen. Toronto: Nelson Canada.
Trench, Alain. 2007. Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Tsebelis, George. 1995. “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicamerialism and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 289325.
Tsebelis, George. 2003. “Federalism and Veto Players.” In Der Preis des Föderalismus, ed. Wagschal, U. and Rentsch, H.. Zurich: Orell Füssli.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed