Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Does Turnout Decline Matter? Electoral Turnout and Partisan Choice in the 1997 Canadian Federal Election

  • Michael D. Martinez (a1) and Jeff Gill (a2)
Abstract

Abstract. The recent decline in electoral turnout in Canada has attracted the concern of scholars and public officials, but the partisan consequences of this decline have received only scant attention. We begin to address that question with a simulation based on the 1997 Canadian Election Study. Based on estimated probabilities of individual behaviour derived from multinomial logit models of voter choice, we find that higher turnout would have likely hurt the Liberal party in Quebec, but slightly helped the Liberals outside of Quebec. We interpret this pattern as evidence that generational politics plays a role in shaping the relationship between electoral turnout and partisan support.

Résumé. Le déclin récent dans la participation électorale au Canada a attiré l'intérêt des chercheurs et des représentants de l'Etat, mais les conséquences partisanes de ce déclin n'ont sucité qu'une attention limitée. Nous commençons à aborder cette question à l'aide d'une simulation basée sur l'Etude électorale canadienne de 1997. En nous appuyant sur des probabilités estimatives du comportement individuel dérivées de modèles logistique multinominal du choix d'électeur, nous constatons qu'une participation plus importante aurait probablement nuit au Parti Libéral au Québec, mais aurait légèrement favorisé le Parti Libéral en dehors du Québec. Nous interprétons ce modèle comme preuve que la politique de générations contribue à la formation du rapport entre la participation électorale et l'appui partisan.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Michael D. Martinez, University of Florida, Department of Political Science, P.O. Box 117325, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7325 USA; martinez@ufl.edu
Jeff Gill, University of California-Davis, Department of Political Science, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616 USA; jgill@ucdavis.edu
Footnotes
Hide All
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2003 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association (Philadelphia). We appreciate helpful comments from Ken Carty, Jan Leighley and this Journal's anonymous reviewers.
Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Bartels, Larry M. 1985. “Expectations and Preferences in Presidential Nominating Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 79: 804815.

Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Panel Effects in the American National Election Studies.” Political Analysis 8: 120.

Bernstein, Robert, Anita Chadha and Robert Montjoy. 2001. “Overreporting Voting—Why It Happens and Why It Matters.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 2244.

Blais, André and Agnieszka Dobrzynska. 1998. “Turnout in Electoral Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 33: 239261.

Blais, André, Elisabeth Gidengil, Neil Nevitte and Richard Nadeau. 2004. “Where Does Turnout Decline Come From?European Journal of Political Research 43: 221236.

Burden, Barry C. 2000. “Voter Turnout and the National Election Studies.” Political Analysis 8: 389398.

Cassel, Carol A. 2004. “Voting Records and Validated Voting Studies.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 102108.

Citrin, Jack, Eric Schickler and John Sides. 2003. “What If Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 7590.

DeNardo, James. 1980. “Turnout and the Vote: The Joke's on the Democrats.” American Political Science Review 74: 406420.

Gray, Mark and Miki Caul. 2000. “Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997—The Effects of Declining Group Mobilization.” Comparative Political Studies 33: 10911122.

Hausman, Jerry and Daniel McFadden. 1984. “Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model.” Econometrica 52: 12191240.

Hicks, Alexander M. and Duane H. Swank. 1992. “Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82.” American Political Science Review 86: 658674.

Hill, Kim Quaile and Jan E. Leighley. 1992. “The Policy Consequences of Class Bias in State Electorates.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 351365.

Karklins, Rasma. 1986. “Soviet Elections Revisited: Abstention in Noncompetitive Voting.” American Political Science Review 80: 449469.

Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review 91: 114.

Little, Roderick J. A. and Donald B. Rubin. 1983. “On Jointly Estimating Parameters and Missing Data by Maximizing the Complete-Data Likelihood.” The American Statistician 37: 218220.

Lyons, William and Robert Alexander. 2000. “A Tale of Two Electorates: Generational Replacement and The Decline of Voting in Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 62: 10141034.

Martinez, Michael D. and Jeff Gill. 2005. “The Effects of Turnout on Partisan Outcomes in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1960–2000.” Journal of Politics 67: 12481274.

Matsusaka, John G. and Filip Palda. 1999. “Voter Turnout: How Much Can We Explain?Public Choice 98: 431446.

Milner, Henry. 1997. “Electoral Systems, Integrated Institutions and Turnout in Local and National Elections: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 30: 89106.

Mueller, Dennis C. and Thomas Stratmann. 2003. “The Economic Effects of Democratic Participation.” Journal of Public Economics 87: 21292155.

Nagel, Jack H. and John E. McNulty. 1996. “Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 90: 780793.

Pacek, Alexander C. and Benjamin Radcliff. 1995. “Turnout and the Vote for Left-of-Center Parties—A Cross-National Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 137143.

Radcliff, Benjamin. 1994. “Turnout and the Democratic Vote.” American Politics Quarterly 22: 259276.

Tucker, Harvey J. and Arnold Vedlitz. 1986. “Controversy: Does Heavy Turnout Help Democrats in Presidential Elections?American Political Science Review 80: 12911304.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 38 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 74 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.