Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Fighting Fire with Fire: The Implications of (Not) Going Negative in a Multiparty Election Campaign

  • Jason Roy (a1) and Christopher Alcantara (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

This paper draws upon data collected from an online voting experiment to test the implications of “going negative” in a multiparty election campaign. Specifically, we investigate two sets of questions: First, does the attention and vote share that candidates receive vary according to the tone (positive/negative) of their election campaign? Second, does the attention and vote share that candidates receive vary according to whether or not all candidates engage in similar (positive/negative) campaigns? While studies of “negative campaigning” have been prominent in the American context, our work builds upon this literature by using an experimental design to test for their effects in a multiparty setting.

Résumé

Cet article se fonde sur des données recueillies lors d'une expérience de vote en ligne visant à mesurer les implications d'une « orientation négative » de la campagne dans une élection multipartite. Plus précisément, nous examinons deux séries de questions : premièrement, l'attention et les suffrages accordés aux candidats varient-ils en fonction du ton (positif/négatif) de leur campagne électorale ? Deuxièmement, l'attention et les suffrages accordés aux candidats varient- ils en fonction du fait que tous les candidats s'engagent ou non dans des campagnes (positives/négatives) analogues ? Même si les études sur les « campagnes négatives » tiennent une place importante dans le contexte américain, notre analyse s'inscrit dans le prolongement de ces travaux en adoptant un concept de recherche expérimentale qui vise à mesurer leurs effets dans un cadre multipartite.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Department of Political Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Email: jroy@wlu.ca
Department of Political Science, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 3K7, Email: calcanta@uwo.ca
References
Hide All
CarraroLuciana, Castelli Luigi and Gawronski Bertram. 2013. “Explicit and Implicit Effects of Attacking the Electorate of the Opposite Party.” Psicologia Sociale 2: 279–96.
CarraroLuciana and Castelli Luigi, Breazu Ioana, Campomizzi Giulia, Cerruto Antonella, Massimiliano and Toto Ivano. 2012. “Just Ignore or Counterattack? On the Effects of Different Strategies for Dealing with Political Attacks.” European Journal of Social Psychology 42: 789–97.
CliffordScott and Jerit Jennifer. 2014. “Is There a Cost to Convenience? An Experimental Comparison of Data Quality in Laboratory and Online Studies.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1 (2): 120–31.
CraigStephen C. and Rippere Paulina and Grayson Marissa Silber. 2014. “Attack and Response in Political Campaigns: An Experimental Study in Two Parts.” Political Communication 31 (4): 647–74.
CuriniLuigi. 2011. “Negative Campaigning in No-Cabinet Alternation Systems: Ideological Closeness and Blames of Corruption in Italy and Japan Using Party Manifesto Data.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 12 (3): 399420.
CuriniLuigi and Martelli Paolo. 2010. “Ideological Proximity and Valence Competition: Negative Campaigning Through Allegation of Corruption in the Italian Legislative Arena from 1946 to 1994.” Electoral Studies 29 (4): 636647.
CulbertLori. 2013. “NDP report calls for more ‘bloody-minded campaign’ next time around.” Vancouver Sun. http://www.vancouversun.com/news/report+calls+more+bloody+minded+campaign+next+time+around/8935933/story.html#ixzz2gEnuf8KO (accessed on September 28, 2016).
DaignaultPénélope, Soroka Stuart and Giasson Thierry. 2013. “The Perception of Political Advertising During an Election Campaign: A Measure of Cognitive Emotional Effects.” Canadian Journal of Communication 38: 167–86.
DermodyJanine and Scullion Richard. 2003. “Exploring the Consequences of Negative Political Advertising for Liberal Democracy.” Journal of Political Marketing 2 (1): 77100.
DermodyJanine and Hanmer-Lloyd Stuart. 2011. “An Introspective, Retrospective, Futurespective Analysis of the Attack Advertising in the 2010 British General Election.” Journal of Marketing Management 27 (7–8): 736–61.
FlanaganThomas. 2007. Harper's Team: Behind the Scenes in the Conservative Rise to Power. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
FlanaganThomas. 2014. Winning Power: Canadian Campaigning in the 21st Century. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
FridkinKim and Kenney Patrick. 2011. “Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 307–25.
FridkinKim and Kenney Patrick. 2008. “The Dimensions of Negative Messages”. American Politics Research. 36(5): 694723.
GeerJohn G. 2006. In Defence of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
HaddockGeoffrey and Zanna Mark. 1997. “Impact of Negative Advertising on Evaluations of Political Candidates: The 1993 Canadian Federal Election.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 19 (2): 205–23.
HansenKasper and Pedersen Rasmus. 2008. “Negative Campaigning in a Multiparty System.” Scandinavian Political Studies 31 (4): 408–27.
JacksonRobert and Mondak Jeffrey. 2009. “Examining the Possible Corrosive Impact of Negative Advertising on Citizens’ Attitudes toward Politics.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (1): 5569.
JeritJennifer. 2004. “Survival of the Fittest: Rhetoric During the Course of an Election Campaign.” Political Psychology 25 (4): 563–75.
KahnemanDaniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Toronto: Penguin Canada.
KrupnikovYanna. 2012. “Negative Advertising and Voter Choice: The Role of Ads in Candidate Selection.” Political Communication 29 (4): 387413.
KrupnikovYanna. 2014. “How Negativity Can Increase and Decrease Voter Turnout: The Effect of Timing.” Political Communication 31 (3): 446–66.
KrupnikovYanna and Bauer Nichole M.. 2014. “The Relationship between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context.” Political Behavior 36: 167–88.
KrupnikovYanna and Piston Spencer. 2015. “Accentuating the Negative: Candidate Race and Campaign Strategy.” Political Communication 32 (1): 152–73.
LauR. R. 1995. “Information search during an election campaign: Introducing a process-tracing methodology for political scientists.” In Political Judgment: Structure and Process, ed. Lodge M. and McGraw K.M.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
LauR. R. 2003. Models of decision making. In Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. Sears D.O., Huddy L. and Jervis R.L.. London: Oxford University Press.
LauRichard R. and Redlawsk David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
LauRichard and Rovner Ivy Brown. 2009. “Negative Campaigning”. Annual Review of Political Science. 12: 285306.
LauRichard, Sigelman Lee, and Rovner Ivy Brown. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment”. The Journal of Politics. 69(4): 11761209.
MarksEric, Manning Mark and Ajzen Icek. 2012. “The Impact of Negative Campaign Ads.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42 (5): 1280–92.
NaiAlessandro. 2013. “What Really Matters is Which Camp Goes Dirty: Differential Effects of Negative Campaigning on Turnout During Swiss Federal Ballots.” European Journal of Political Research 52 (1): 4470.
PattieCharles, Denver David, Johns Robert and Mitchell James. 2010. “Raising the Tone? The Impact of ‘Positive’ and ‘Negative’ Campaigning on Voting in the 2007 Scottish Parliament Election.” Electoral Studies 30 (2): 333–43.
RedlawskDavid P. 2004. “What Voters Do: Information Search during Election Campaigns.” Political Psychology 25 (August): 595610
RoseJonathan. 2004. “Television Attack Ads: Planting the Seeds of Doubt.” IRPP Policy Options. September: 9296.
RozinPaul and Royzman Edward B.. 2001. “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 5 (4): 296320.
SimpsonJeffery. 2011. “The truth about attack ads: They work.” Globe and Mail (Toronto). http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/the-truth-about-attack-ads-they-work/article623025/ (accessed on September 28, 2016).
SorokaStuart. 2014. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. Cambridge University Press.
SorokaStuart and McAdams Stephen. 2015. “News, Politics and Negativity.” Political Communication 32(1): 122.
StevensDaniel, Sullivan John, Allen Barbara, and Alger Dean. 2008. “What's Good for the Goose is Bad for the Gander: Negative Political Advertising, Partisanship, and Turnout”. The Journal of Politics. 70(2): 527541.
SullivanJonathan and Sapir Eliyahu. 2012. “Modelling Negative Campaign Advertising: Evidence from Taiwan”. Asian Journal of Communication. 22(3): 289303.
WalterAnnemarie S. 2012. “Choosing the Enemy: Attack Behaviour in a Multiparty System.” Party Politics 20 (3): 311–23.
WalterAnnemarie S. and Vliegenthart Rens. 2010. “Negative Campaigning Across Different Communication Channels: Different Ball Games?The International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (4): 441–61.
WalterAnnemarie S. and van der Brug Wouter. 2013. “When the Gloves Come Off: Inter-Party Variation in Negative Campaigning in Dutch Elections, 1981–2010.” Acta Politica 48 (4): 367388.
WalterAnnemarie, van der Brug Wouter and van Praag Philip. 2013. “When the Stakes Are High: Party Competition and Negative Campaigning.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (4): 550–73.
WuDenis and Dahmen Nicole. 2010. “Web Sponsorship and Campaign Effects: Assessing the Difference between Positive and Negative Websites.” Journal of Political Marketing 9 (4): 314–29.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 117 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 382 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 26th October 2016 - 24th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.