Skip to main content

Fighting Fire with Fire: The Implications of (Not) Going Negative in a Multiparty Election Campaign

  • Jason Roy (a1) and Christopher Alcantara (a2)

This paper draws upon data collected from an online voting experiment to test the implications of “going negative” in a multiparty election campaign. Specifically, we investigate two sets of questions: First, does the attention and vote share that candidates receive vary according to the tone (positive/negative) of their election campaign? Second, does the attention and vote share that candidates receive vary according to whether or not all candidates engage in similar (positive/negative) campaigns? While studies of “negative campaigning” have been prominent in the American context, our work builds upon this literature by using an experimental design to test for their effects in a multiparty setting.

Cet article se fonde sur des données recueillies lors d'une expérience de vote en ligne visant à mesurer les implications d'une « orientation négative » de la campagne dans une élection multipartite. Plus précisément, nous examinons deux séries de questions : premièrement, l'attention et les suffrages accordés aux candidats varient-ils en fonction du ton (positif/négatif) de leur campagne électorale ? Deuxièmement, l'attention et les suffrages accordés aux candidats varient- ils en fonction du fait que tous les candidats s'engagent ou non dans des campagnes (positives/négatives) analogues ? Même si les études sur les « campagnes négatives » tiennent une place importante dans le contexte américain, notre analyse s'inscrit dans le prolongement de ces travaux en adoptant un concept de recherche expérimentale qui vise à mesurer leurs effets dans un cadre multipartite.

Corresponding author
Department of Political Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Email:
Department of Political Science, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 3K7, Email:
Hide All
Carraro, Luciana, Castelli, Luigi and Gawronski, Bertram. 2013. “Explicit and Implicit Effects of Attacking the Electorate of the Opposite Party.” Psicologia Sociale 2: 279–96.
Carraro, Luciana and Castelli, Luigi, Breazu, Ioana, Campomizzi, Giulia, Cerruto, Antonella, Massimiliano, and Toto, Ivano. 2012. “Just Ignore or Counterattack? On the Effects of Different Strategies for Dealing with Political Attacks.” European Journal of Social Psychology 42: 789–97.
Clifford, Scott and Jerit, Jennifer. 2014. “Is There a Cost to Convenience? An Experimental Comparison of Data Quality in Laboratory and Online Studies.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1 (2): 120–31.
Craig, Stephen C. and Rippere, Paulina and Grayson, Marissa Silber. 2014. “Attack and Response in Political Campaigns: An Experimental Study in Two Parts.” Political Communication 31 (4): 647–74.
Curini, Luigi. 2011. “Negative Campaigning in No-Cabinet Alternation Systems: Ideological Closeness and Blames of Corruption in Italy and Japan Using Party Manifesto Data.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 12 (3): 399420.
Curini, Luigi and Martelli, Paolo. 2010. “Ideological Proximity and Valence Competition: Negative Campaigning Through Allegation of Corruption in the Italian Legislative Arena from 1946 to 1994.” Electoral Studies 29 (4): 636647.
Culbert, Lori. 2013. “NDP report calls for more ‘bloody-minded campaign’ next time around.” Vancouver Sun. (accessed on September 28, 2016).
Daignault, Pénélope, Soroka, Stuart and Giasson, Thierry. 2013. “The Perception of Political Advertising During an Election Campaign: A Measure of Cognitive Emotional Effects.” Canadian Journal of Communication 38: 167–86.
Dermody, Janine and Scullion, Richard. 2003. “Exploring the Consequences of Negative Political Advertising for Liberal Democracy.” Journal of Political Marketing 2 (1): 77100.
Dermody, Janine and Hanmer-Lloyd, Stuart. 2011. “An Introspective, Retrospective, Futurespective Analysis of the Attack Advertising in the 2010 British General Election.” Journal of Marketing Management 27 (7–8): 736–61.
Flanagan, Thomas. 2007. Harper's Team: Behind the Scenes in the Conservative Rise to Power. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Flanagan, Thomas. 2014. Winning Power: Canadian Campaigning in the 21st Century. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Fridkin, Kim and Kenney, Patrick. 2011. “Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 307–25.
Fridkin, Kim and Kenney, Patrick. 2008. “The Dimensions of Negative Messages”. American Politics Research. 36(5): 694723.
Geer, John G. 2006. In Defence of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Haddock, Geoffrey and Zanna, Mark. 1997. “Impact of Negative Advertising on Evaluations of Political Candidates: The 1993 Canadian Federal Election.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 19 (2): 205–23.
Hansen, Kasper and Pedersen, Rasmus. 2008. “Negative Campaigning in a Multiparty System.” Scandinavian Political Studies 31 (4): 408–27.
Jackson, Robert and Mondak, Jeffrey. 2009. “Examining the Possible Corrosive Impact of Negative Advertising on Citizens’ Attitudes toward Politics.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (1): 5569.
Jerit, Jennifer. 2004. “Survival of the Fittest: Rhetoric During the Course of an Election Campaign.” Political Psychology 25 (4): 563–75.
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Toronto: Penguin Canada.
Krupnikov, Yanna. 2012. “Negative Advertising and Voter Choice: The Role of Ads in Candidate Selection.” Political Communication 29 (4): 387413.
Krupnikov, Yanna. 2014. “How Negativity Can Increase and Decrease Voter Turnout: The Effect of Timing.” Political Communication 31 (3): 446–66.
Krupnikov, Yanna and Bauer, Nichole M.. 2014. “The Relationship between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context.” Political Behavior 36: 167–88.
Krupnikov, Yanna and Piston, Spencer. 2015. “Accentuating the Negative: Candidate Race and Campaign Strategy.” Political Communication 32 (1): 152–73.
Lau, R. R. 1995. “Information search during an election campaign: Introducing a process-tracing methodology for political scientists.” In Political Judgment: Structure and Process, ed. Lodge, M. and McGraw, K.M.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lau, R. R. 2003. Models of decision making. In Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. Sears, D.O., Huddy, L. and Jervis, R.L.. London: Oxford University Press.
Lau, Richard R. and Redlawsk, David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lau, Richard and Rovner, Ivy Brown. 2009. “Negative Campaigning”. Annual Review of Political Science. 12: 285306.
Lau, Richard, Sigelman, Lee, and Rovner, Ivy Brown. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment”. The Journal of Politics. 69(4): 11761209.
Marks, Eric, Manning, Mark and Ajzen, Icek. 2012. “The Impact of Negative Campaign Ads.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42 (5): 1280–92.
Nai, Alessandro. 2013. “What Really Matters is Which Camp Goes Dirty: Differential Effects of Negative Campaigning on Turnout During Swiss Federal Ballots.” European Journal of Political Research 52 (1): 4470.
Pattie, Charles, Denver, David, Johns, Robert and Mitchell, James. 2010. “Raising the Tone? The Impact of ‘Positive’ and ‘Negative’ Campaigning on Voting in the 2007 Scottish Parliament Election.” Electoral Studies 30 (2): 333–43.
Redlawsk, David P. 2004. “What Voters Do: Information Search during Election Campaigns.” Political Psychology 25 (August): 595610
Rose, Jonathan. 2004. “Television Attack Ads: Planting the Seeds of Doubt.” IRPP Policy Options. September: 9296.
Rozin, Paul and Royzman, Edward B.. 2001. “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 5 (4): 296320.
Simpson, Jeffery. 2011. “The truth about attack ads: They work.” Globe and Mail (Toronto). (accessed on September 28, 2016).
Soroka, Stuart. 2014. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. Cambridge University Press.
Soroka, Stuart and McAdams, Stephen. 2015. “News, Politics and Negativity.” Political Communication 32(1): 122.
Stevens, Daniel, Sullivan, John, Allen, Barbara, and Alger, Dean. 2008. “What's Good for the Goose is Bad for the Gander: Negative Political Advertising, Partisanship, and Turnout”. The Journal of Politics. 70(2): 527541.
Sullivan, Jonathan and Sapir, Eliyahu. 2012. “Modelling Negative Campaign Advertising: Evidence from Taiwan”. Asian Journal of Communication. 22(3): 289303.
Walter, Annemarie S. 2012. “Choosing the Enemy: Attack Behaviour in a Multiparty System.” Party Politics 20 (3): 311–23.
Walter, Annemarie S. and Vliegenthart, Rens. 2010. “Negative Campaigning Across Different Communication Channels: Different Ball Games?The International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (4): 441–61.
Walter, Annemarie S. and van der Brug, Wouter. 2013. “When the Gloves Come Off: Inter-Party Variation in Negative Campaigning in Dutch Elections, 1981–2010.” Acta Politica 48 (4): 367388.
Walter, Annemarie, van der Brug, Wouter and van Praag, Philip. 2013. “When the Stakes Are High: Party Competition and Negative Campaigning.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (4): 550–73.
Wu, Denis and Dahmen, Nicole. 2010. “Web Sponsorship and Campaign Effects: Assessing the Difference between Positive and Negative Websites.” Journal of Political Marketing 9 (4): 314–29.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed