Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Alcantara, Christopher and Davidson, Adrienne 2015. Negotiating Aboriginal Self-Government Agreements in Canada: An Analysis of the Inuvialuit Experience. Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, Issue. 03, p. 553.


    McGetrick, Jennifer Ann Bubela, Tania and Hik, David S. 2015. Circumpolar stakeholder perspectives on Geographic Information Systems for communicating the health impacts of development. Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 54, p. 176.


    Alcantara, Christopher and Wilson, Gary N. 2014. The Dynamics of Intra-jurisdictional Relations in the Inuit Regions of the Canadian Arctic: An Institutionalist Perspective. Regional & Federal Studies, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 43.


    ×
  • Canadian Journal of Political Science, Volume 45, Issue 4
  • December 2012, pp. 781-804

Mixing Politics and Business in the Canadian Arctic: Inuit Corporate Governance in Nunavik and the Inuvialuit Settlement Region

  • Gary N. Wilson (a1) and Christopher Alcantara (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008423912000996
  • Published online: 01 May 2013
Abstract

Abstract. Over the past three decades, Inuit economic development corporations (IEDCs) have played an important role in preparing the Inuit regions of Nunavik in northern Québec and the Inuvialuit Settlement Region in the Northwest Territories for self-government. In addition to building vital capacity through the provision of services, programs and economic opportunities, IEDCs have also represented their respective regions in self-government negotiations with other levels of government. This corporate-led governance approach, which we call Inuit corporate governance, provides Aboriginal groups such as the Inuit with a de facto form of self-government and the opportunity to develop economic and political capacity in advance of adopting a more comprehensive and formal self-government arrangement. It also challenges existing assumptions about the relationship between Aboriginal peoples and the liberal–capitalist order that underpins the Canadian state.

Résumé. Durant les trois dernières décennies, les Institutions de développement économique des Inuits ont joué un rôle important en préparation à l'auto-gouvernance de la population Inuit du Nunavik, dans le Nord-du-Québec, et de l'Inuvialuit, dans les Territoires du Nord-Ouest. En plus d'avoir permis le développement d'habiletés cruciales dans le domaine de l'offre de services, de programmes et d'opportunités de développement économique, les Institutions ont également contribué, à titre de représentantes de leurs régions respectives, lors de la négociation d'ententes portant sur l'auto-gouvernance avec divers paliers de gouvernement. Cette approche de gouvernance corporative Inuit fournit aux groupes autochtones, tels les Inuits, une forme d'auto-gouvernance de facto qui génère pour eux des opportunités de se développer économiquement et politiquement, en préparation à l'adoption d'un modèle d'auto-gouvernance plus élaboré et formel. Cette approche soulève également bien des questions quant aux fondements de la relation qui existe entre les peuples autochtones et l'ordre libéral capitaliste qui sous-tend l'État canadien.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Gary N. Wilson, Department of Political Science, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 4Z9, email: wilsong@unbc.ca.
Christopher Alcantara, Department of Political Science, Alvin Woods Building, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3C5, email: calcantara@wlu.ca.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Frances Abele and Michael J. Prince. 2006. “Four Pathways to Aboriginal Self-Government in Canada.” The American Review of Canadian Studies 36 (4): 568–95.

Christopher Alcantara , Zac Spicer and Rob Leone. 2012. Forthcoming. “Institutional Design and the Accountability Paradox: A Case Study of Aboriginal Accountability Regimes in Canada.” Canadian Public Administration 55 (1).

Stephen Cornell and Joseph P. Kalt. 1998. “Sovereignty and Nation-Building: The Development Challenge in Indian Country Today.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 22 (3): 187214.

Glen Coulthard . 2007. “Subjects of Empire: Indigenous Peoples and the ‘Politics of Recognition’ in Canada.” Contemporary Political Theory 6 (4): 437–60.

James Tully . 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Graham White . 2002. “Treaty Federalism in Northern Canada: Aboriginal-Government Land Claims Boards.” Publius: Journal of Federalism 32 (3): 89114

Gary N. Wilson 2008. “Nested Federalism in Arctic Quebec: A Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 7192.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×