Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Planning for the Future: Methodology Training in Canadian Universities

  • Michelle L. Dion (a1) and Laura B. Stephenson (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Recent changes in government policy making and the labour market have created new opportunities for political scientists, provided that we have the skills to respond to them. We argue that changes need to be made in the area of methodology training in order to capitalize on these opportunities. Canadian political scientists should ensure that all our students acquire basic quantitative competencies, in addition to research design and qualitative analysis training, and that those graduate students interested in more sophisticated quantitative methods have the opportunity to develop those skills. We explain how expanding and deepening training in quantitative methods is one strategy for ensuring a role for political science in evidence-based policy making, for expanding labour market options for students, and for keeping apace with disciplinary trends. We caution, however, that special care needs to be taken to ensure that all political scientists have equal opportunities to develop such skills.

Resume

Les changements récents survenus dans le processus de prise de décision du gouvernement et sur le marché du travail ont ouvert de nouvelles perspectives aux politologues, pourvu qu’ils aient les compétences pour y répondre. Pour tirer parti de ces ouvertures, nous soutenons que des changements s’imposent sur le plan de la formation dans le domaine de la méthodologie de la recherche. Les politologues canadiens doivent s’assurer que tous nos étudiants acquièrent les compétences quantitatives élémentaires, outre la formation en conception de la recherche et en analyse quantitative, et que les diplômés aux cycles supérieurs qui manifestent de l’intérêt pour des méthodes quantitatives plus complexes ont la possibilité de perfectionner ces compétences. Nous expliquons que l’élargissement de la formation aux méthodes quantitatives et son approfondissement est une des stratégies permettant à la science politique de jouer son rôle dans l’élaboration de politiques fondées sur des données probantes, de donner plus de choix aux étudiants sur le marché de travail et de progresser au rythme des tendances de la discipline. Nous tenons, toutefois, à faire remarques qu’une attention particulière doit être portée pour assurer que tous les politologues ont des chances égales de développer de telles compétences.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Department of Political Science, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4M4, email: dionm@mcmaster.ca
Department of Political Science, The University of Western Ontario, Room 4154, Social Science Centre, London, Ontario, N6A 5C2, email: laura.stephenson@uwo.ca
References
Hide All
Holly Birkett and David Marsh . 2014. “What Is to Be Done? A Broad Church and the Impact of Political Science Research—A Response to Matthew Wood.” Politics 34 (3): 301–05.

Elizabeth A. Corley and Meghna Sabharwal . 2010. “Scholarly Collaboration and Productivity Patterns in Public Administration: Analysing Recent Trends.” Public Administration 88 (3): 627–48.

Richard Hawkins , Cooper H. Langford and Chad Saunders . 2015. “Assessing the Practical Application of Social Knowledge: A Survey of Six Leading Canadian Universities.” Research Policy 44 (1): 8395.

Michael Howlett . 2009. “Policy Analytical Capacity and Evidence-Based Policy-Making: Lessons from Canada.” Canadian Public Administration 52 (2): 153–75.

Kelly M. Kadera 2013. “The Social Underpinnings of Women's Worth in the Study of World Politics: Culture, Leader Emergence, and Coauthorship.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 436–75.

Gary King . 2011. “Ensuring the Data-Rich Future of the Social Sciences.” Science 331 (6018): 719–21.

Réjean Landry , Nabil Amara and Moktar Lamari . 2001. “Utilization of Social Science Research Knowledge in Canada.” Research Policy 30 (2): 333–49.

Daniel Maliniak , Amy Oakes , Susan Peterson and Michael J. Tierney . 2008. “Women in International Relations.” Politics & Gender 4 (1): 122–44.

Helen Margetts . 2015. “Maximizing the Relevance of Political Science for Public Policy in the Era of Big Data.” In The Relevance of Political Science, ed. Gerry Stoker , Jon Pierre and B. Guy Peters . Basingstoke UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lawrence M. Mead 2010. “Scholasticism in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2): 453–64.

Éric Montpetit , André Blais and Martial Foucault . 2008. “What Does It Take for a Canadian Political Scientist to Be Cited?Social Science Quarterly 89 (3): 802–16.

Jos C.N. Raadschelders and Kwang-Hoon Lee . 2011. “Trends in the Study of Public Administration: Empirical and Qualitative Observations from Public Administration Review, 2000–2009.” Public Administration Review 71 (1): 1933.

A. Schedler and C. Mudde . 2010. “Data Usage in Quantitative Comparative Politics.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (2): 417–33.

Gerry Stoker , Jon Pierre and B. Guy Peters , eds. 2015. The Relevance of Political Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Matthew Wood . 2014. “Bridging the Relevance Gap in Political Science.” Politics 34 (3): 275–86.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 124 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 315 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 11th April 2017 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.