Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Research Openness in Canadian Political Science: Toward an Inclusive and Differentiated Discussion

  • Genevieve Fuji Johnson (a1), Mark Pickup (a1), Eline A. de Rooij (a1) and Rémi Léger (a1)
Abstract

In this paper, we initiate a discussion within the Canadian political science community about research openness and its implications for our discipline. This discussion is important because the Tri-Agency has recently released guidelines on data management and because a number of political science journals, from several subfields, have signed the Journal Editors’ Transparency Statement requiring data access and research transparency (DA-RT). As norms regarding research openness develop, an increasing number and range of journals and funding agencies may begin to implement DA-RT-type requirements. If Canadian political scientists wish to continue to participate in the global political science community, we must take careful note of and be proactive participants in the ongoing developments concerning research openness.

Dans cet article nous amorçons une discussion au sein de la communauté canadienne de science politique sur l'ouverture de la recherche et ses incidences pour notre discipline. Cette discussion est importante en raison de la publication récente des lignes directrices sur la gestion des données par les trois organismes ainsi que de la déclaration souscrite par plusieurs journaux de science politique, dans plusieurs sous-domaines, prônant l'accessibilité des données et la transparence en recherche (DA-RT). À mesure que les normes concernant les pratiques d'ouverture s’élaborent, un éventail et un nombre croissant de revues spécialisées et d'organismes de financement de la recherche peuvent commencer à mettre en œuvre des exigences de type DA-RT. Si les politologues canadiens souhaitent continuer à faire partie de la communauté mondiale de science politique, il convient de prendre soigneusement note des évolutions en cours concernant l'ouverture de la recherche et en être des participants proactifs.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, email: gfjohnso@sfu.ca
Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, email: mark.pickup@sfu.ca
Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, email: eline_de_rooij@sfu.ca
Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, email: remi_leger@sfu.ca
References
Hide All
American Political Science Association (APSA). 2012. A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Science. 2nd ed. http://www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/Publications/APSAEthicsGuide2012.pdf (September 12, 2016).
Bleich, Erik and Pekkanen, Robert J.. 2015. “Data Access, Research Transparency, and Interviews: The Interview Methods Appendix.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 13 (1): 812.
Büthe, Tim and Jacobs, Alan M., eds. 2015a. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 13 (1).
Büthe, Tim and Jacobs, Alan M.. 2015b. “Introduction to the Symposium.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 13 (1): 27.
Büthe, Tim and Jacobs, Alan M.. 2015c. “Conclusion: Research Transparency for a Diverse Discipline.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 13 (1): 5262.
Canadian Political Science Association Diversity Task Force. 2012. Report and Analysis of the Canadian Political Science Association Member Survey. https://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/documents/pdfs/diversity/2012_Diversity_Task_Force_Report.pdf (May 2012).
Carens, Joseph. 2000. Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carsey, Thomas M. 2014. “Making DA-RT a Reality.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1): 7277.
Cramer, Katherine. 2015. “Transparent Explanations, Yes. Public Transcripts and Fieldnotes, No: Ethnographic Research on Public Opinion.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 15 (1): 1720.
Dafoe, Allan. 2014. “Science Deserve Better: The Imperative to Share Complete Replication Files.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1): 6066.
Data Access and Research Transparency (DA-RT). http://www.dartstatement.org (June 2015).
Data Access and Research Transparency (DA-RT). “Events.” http://www.dartstatement.org/events (June 2015).
Elman, Colin and Kapiszewski, Diana. 2014. “Data Access and Research Transparency in the Qualitative Tradition.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1): 4347.
European Union. 2016. “Open Access & Data Management.” In Horizon 2020 Online Manual. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/open-access-dissemination_en.htm (December 7, 2016).
Flaherty, Colleen. 2015. “More Time on Transparency.” Inside Higher ED. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/11/16/political-scientists-seek-delay-transparency-standards-publications (November 16, 2015).
Fujii, Lee Ann. 2016. “The Dark Side of DA-RT.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 26 (1): 2527.
Golder, Matt and Golder, Sona N., eds. 2016a. Comparative Politics Newsletter: The Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association 26 (1).
Golder, Matt and Golder, Sona N.. 2016b. “Letter from the Editors.Comparative Politics Newsletter 26 (1): 19.
Gordin, Michael. 2015. Scientific Babel: How Science Was Done Before and After Global English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hall, Peter A. 2016. “Transparency, Research Integrity, and Multiple Methods.Comparative Politics Newsletter 26 (1): 2831.
Hochschild, Jennifer, Lake, David A. and Hero, Rodney E.. 2015. “Data Access and Research Transparency Initiative (DA-RT).” PS Now. http://www.politicalsciencenow.com/data-access-and-research-transparency-initiative-da-rt/ (September 6, 2016).
Htun, Mala. 2016. “DA-RT and the Social Conditions of Knowledge Production in Political Science.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 26 (1): 3235.
Humphreys, Macartan, Sanchez de la Sierra, Raul and Van der Windt, Peter. 2013. “Fishing, Commitment, and Communication: A Proposal for Comprehensive Nonbinding Research Registration.Political Analysis 21(1): 120.
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015. “For a More Public Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (2): 269–83.
Jacoby, William G. and Lupton, Robert N.. 2016. “AJPS Replication and Verification Policy.American Journal of Political Science. https://ajps.org/ajps-replication-policy/ (Sept. 5, 2016).
Journal Editors Transparency Statement (JETS). 2014. Data Access and Research Transparency (DA-RT). http://www.dartstatement.org/2014-journal-editors-statement-jets (June 2015).
King, Gary. 1995. “Replication, Replication.PS:Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 444–52.
Kymlicka, Will. 1998. Finding Our Way: Rethinking Ethnocultural Relations in Canada. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lebovitch, Amy. 2015. “Foreword,” Shawna Ferris, Street Sex Work and Canadian Cities: Resisting a Dangerous Order. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.
Lupia, Arthur and Alter, George. 2014. “Data Access and Research Transparency in the Quantitative Tradition.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1): 5459.
Lupia, Arthur and Elman, Colin. 2014. “Openness in Political Science: Data Access and Research Transparency.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1): 1942.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2014. “Transparency: The Revolution in Qualitative Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1): 4853.
Pachirat, Timothy. 2015. “The Tyranny of Light.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 13 (1): 1327–31.
Parkinson, E. Sarah and Wood, Elisabeth J.. 2015. “Transparency in Intensive Research on Violence: Ethical Dilemmas and Unforeseen Consequences.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 15 (1): 2227.
Powell, Bing. 2016. “Letter From Distinguished Political Scientists Urging Nuanced Journal Interpretation of JETS Policy Guidelines.” PS Now. http://www.politicalsciencenow.com/letter-from-distinguished-political-scientists-urging-nuanced-journal-interpretation-of-jets-policy-guidelines/ (January 13, 2016).
Research Councils UK. 2011. Common Principles on Data Policy. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/datapolicy (December 7, 2016).
Research Councils UK. 2015. Guidance on Best Practice in the Management of Research Data. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/rcukcommonprinciplesondatapolicy-pdf (December 7, 2016).
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine and Yanow, Dvora. 2016. “Legitimizing Political Science or Splitting the Discipline? Reflections on DA-RT and the Policy-making Role of a Professional Association.Politics & Gender 12 (3): 119.
Séguin, Ève. 2015. “Quand ‘English’ rime avec ‘rubbish’.” Découvrir: Le magazine de l'ACFAS. http://www.acfas.ca/publications/decouvrir/2015/04/quand-english-rime-avec-rubbish (January 25, 2017).
Shih, Victor. 2015. “Research in Authoritarian Regimes: Transparency Tradeoffs and Solutions.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 13 (1): 2021.
Tri-Agency Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management. 2016. http://www.science.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=83F7624E-1 (July 15, 2016).
TCPS2. 2014. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf (September 19, 2016).
Warren, Mark E. and Pearse, Hilary. eds. 2008. Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, Melissa S. 1998. Voice, Trust and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Yashar, Deborah. 2016. “Editorial Trust, Gatekeeping, and the Unintended Consequences.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 26 (1): 5764.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed