Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-nq5v5 Total loading time: 0.303 Render date: 2022-03-12T10:30:30.063Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Perceptions de l’arrêt de la dialyse et des traitements de maintien de la vie chez la clientèle québécoise en hémodialyse hospitalière: comparaison selon l’âge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2012

Judith Gagnon*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta
Jocelyne Saint-Arnaud
Affiliation:
Faculté des sciences Infirmières, Université de Montréal
Marc Bourdeau
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique, Université de Montréal Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta
Josée Côté
Affiliation:
Faculté des sciences Infirmières, Université de Montréal
Claire Chapados
Affiliation:
Faculté des sciences Infirmières, Université de Montréal
Cécile Michaud
Affiliation:
École des sciences Infirmières, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke
*
*La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à : Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: Judith Gagnon, M.Sc. 7708 154A Street NW Edmonton, AB T5R 1V2 (judith.gagnon@hotmail.com)

Abstract

The End-Stage Renal Disease population is aging. Considering that hemodialysis is a treatment that maintains and prolongs life, this descriptive-comparative study looks at the perceptions of patients according to age group -<65 years, n=121 and ≥65 years, n=123, as it pertains to dialysis treatment cessation and life-sustaining treatments. Results: Older patients are more indecisive as to what dialysis treatment cessation may actually represent for them (p=0,01). They expressed a greater need for support from the health care team if they decided to stop dialysis treatments (p=0,02); a greater involvement from the physician (p=0,04); and, in the event patients could not take part in end-of-life decision-making, they would give priority to the wishes of loved ones instead of their own wishes (p=0,01). Conclusion: Advanced care planning is necessary to demystify hemodialysis withdrawal and to support patients and their loved ones through this process.

Résumé

La clientèle au stade terminal d’insuffisance rénale est vieillissante. Considérant le fait que l’hémodialyse est un traitement qui maintien et prolonge la vie cette étude décrit et compare les perceptions de deux groupes de patients en hémodialyse selon l’âge -<65ans, n=121 et ≥65 ans, n=123) - quant à l’arrêt de la dialyse et les traitements de fin de vie. Résultats: Les ≥65 ans sont indécis quant à ce que représente un arrêt de dialyse (p= 0,01); ils souhaitent davantage le soutien de l’équipe de soins advenant l’arrêt de dialyse (p=0,02); ils sont plus nombreux à vouloir que le médecin décide pour eux des traitements de fin de vie (p=0,04); et, si inaptes, ils veulent d’avantage que les volontés de leurs proches aient priorité sur les leurs (p=0,01). Conclusion: Une planification des soins de fin de vie intégrée aux soins peut aider à démystifier l’arrêt de l’hémodialyse et à soutenir la clientèle âgée dans ce processus.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birmelé, B. (2006). L’arrêt de dialyse: une situation fréquente, parfois difficile à accepter. Néphrologie et Thérapeutique, 2(1), 2428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvin, A.O. (2004). Haemodialysis patients and end-of-life decisions: A theory of personal preservation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(5), 558566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, L.M., Fischel, S., Germain, M., Woods, A., Braden, G.L., & McCue, J. (1996). Ambivalence and dialysis discontinuation. General Hospital Psychiatry, 18(6), 431435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, L.M., McCue, J.D., Germain, M., et Woods, A. (1997). Denying the dying. Advance directives and dialysis discontinuation. Psychosomatics, 38(1), 2734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, L.M., Germain, M., Poppel, D.M., Woods, A., & Kjellstrand, C.M. (2000). Dialysis discontinuation and palliative care. American Journal of Kidney Disease, 36(1), 140144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, L.M., & Germain, M. (2005). The psychiatric landscape of withdrawal. Seminars in Dialysis, 18(2), 147153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, L.M., Moss, A.H., Weisbord, S.D., & Germain, M.J. (2006). Editorial: Renal palliative care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 9(4), 977992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, S.N. (2001). Quality end-of-life care in dialysis units. Seminars in Dialysis, 15(1), 4144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, S.N. (2011). Integrating palliative care for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: Recent advances, remaining challenges. Journal of Palliative Care, 27(1), 5361.Google ScholarPubMed
Davison, S.N., Jhangri, G.S., & Johnson, J.A. (2006). Cross-sectional validity of a modified Edmonton symptom assessment system in dialysis patients: A simple assessment of symptom burden. International Society of Nephrology, 69, 16211625.Google ScholarPubMed
Davison, S.N., & Simpson, C. (2006). Hope and advance care planning in patients with end stage renal disease: Qualitative interview study. British Medical Journal, 333, 888889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davison, S.N., & Torgunrud, C. (2007). The creation of an advance care planning process for patients with ESRD. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 49(1), 2736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinwiddie, L.C. (2003). Insight into the ESRD workgroup final report summary on end-of-life care. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 30(1), 58.Google ScholarPubMed
Drought, T.S., & Koenig, B.A. (2002). “Choice” in end-of-life decision making: Researching fact or fiction? Gerontologist, 42(Spec No 3), 114128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emanuel, E.J., Fairclough, D.L., Wolfe, P., & Emanuel, L.L. (2004). Talking with terminally ill patients and their caregivers about death, dying, and bereavement: Is it stressful? Is it helpful? Archives of Internal Medicine, 164(18), 19992004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, D.M., Way, C.Y., Hutchinson, T., Barrett, B., & Parfrey, P.S. (1998). Patients’ perceptions of their experiences with ESRD and hemodialysis treatment. Quality Health Research, 8, 764783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hines, S.C., Babrow, A.S., Badzek, L., & Moss, A. (2001). From coping with life to coping with death: Problematic integration for the seriously ill elderly. Health Community, 13(3), 327342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, T.A. (2005). Transitions in the lives of patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A cause of suffering and an opportunity for healing. Palliative Medicine, 19(4), 270277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institut Canadien d’Information sur la Santé. (2011). Traitement du Stade Terminal de l’Insuffisance Organique au Canada, 2002 et 2003. Registre Canadien de l’Insuffisance Organique au Canada.
Johnson, R., Baranowski-Birkmeier, T., & O’Donnell, J. (1995). Advanced directives in the medical intensive care unit of a community teaching hospital. Chest 107(3), 152156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, S.R. (1998). Intensive care, old age, and the problem of death in America. Gerontologist, 38(6), 715725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, S.R., Shim, J.K., & Russ, A.J. (2006). Old age, life extension, and the character of medical choice. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 61(4), S175S184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendelssohn, D.C. (1997). Principles of end-stage renal disease care. Annals of Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 30(5), 271273.Google Scholar
Ott, B.B. (1999). Advance directives: The emerging body of research. American Journal of Critical Care, 8(1), 514519.Google Scholar
Russ, A.J., Shim, J.K., & Kaufman, S.R. (2005). “Is there life on dialysis?”: Time and aging in a clinically sustained existence. Medical Anthropology, 24, 297324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Arnaud, J. (2000). “L’approche bioéthique par principes: Fondements et critiques”. Byk, Dans C. (Ed.), La Bioéthique: Un Langage pour mieux se comprendre? (pp. 5569). Paris: Éditions Alexandre Lacassagne/ESKA.Google Scholar
Saint-Arnaud, J. (2005). Les familles et les équipes de soin face à l’arrêt de traitement de maintien de vie: aspects éthiques et juridiques. Bartha, Dans K.M., Herve, C., Molinari, P.A., et Moutel, G. (Ed.), Place de la Bioéthique en Recherche et dans les Services Cliniques (pp. 191207). Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Saint-Arnaud, J., Bouchard, L., Loiselle, C.G., Verrier, P., Laflamme, M.C., et Audet, M. (2003). L’impact de la rareté des ressources sur la pratique de la dialyse au Québec. Perspective infirmière, 1(2), 1631.Google Scholar
Sansone, P., & Philips, M. (1995). Advanced directives for elderly people: Worthwhile cause or wasted effort? Social Work, 40(3), 397401.Google ScholarPubMed
Schneiderman, L.J., Pearlman, R.A., Kaplan, R.M., Anderson, J.P., & Rosenberg, E.M. (1992). Relationship of general advance directive instructions to specific life-sustaining treatment preferences in patients with serious illness. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152(10), 21142122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seymour, J., Gott, M., Bellamy, G., Ahmedzi, S.H., & Clark, D. (2004). Planning for the end of life: The views of older people about advance care statements. Social science and Medicine, 54, 5768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, R.J.A., Cassidy, M.J.D., & Masud, T. (2003). The increasing number of older patients with renal disease. British Medical Journal, 327(7413), 463464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, P.A., Martin, D.G., Lavery, J.V., Thiel, E.C., Kelner, M., & Mendelssohn, D.C. (1998). Reconceptualizing advance care planning from the patient’s perspective. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158, 879883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonnenblick, M., Friendlander, Y., & Steinberg, A. (1992). Dissociation between the wishes of terminally ill patients and decisions by their offspring. Journal of the American Geriatry Society, 41(6), 499604.Google Scholar
Tulsky, J.A. (2005). Interventions to enhance communication among patients, providers and families. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8(1), S95S102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US, Renal, Data, and System. (2004). Morbidity and Mortality, 2005 annual report.
Watne, K., & Donner, T.A. (1995). Distinguishing between life-saving and life- sustaining treatments: When the physician and spouse disagree. Dimension of Critical Care Nursing, 14(1), 4247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, Y., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2006). Dialysis: Prolonging life or prolonging dying? Ethical, legal and professional considerations for end of life decision making. EDTNA/ERCA Journal, 32(2), 99103.Google ScholarPubMed

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Perceptions de l’arrêt de la dialyse et des traitements de maintien de la vie chez la clientèle québécoise en hémodialyse hospitalière: comparaison selon l’âge
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Perceptions de l’arrêt de la dialyse et des traitements de maintien de la vie chez la clientèle québécoise en hémodialyse hospitalière: comparaison selon l’âge
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Perceptions de l’arrêt de la dialyse et des traitements de maintien de la vie chez la clientèle québécoise en hémodialyse hospitalière: comparaison selon l’âge
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *