Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Iconic Sign Comprehension in Older Adults: The Role of Cognitive Impairment and Text Enhancement*

  • Charles Scialfa (a1), Pat Spadafora (a2), Marianne Klein (a2), Agata Lesnik (a2), Lindsay Dial (a1) and Antje Heinrich (a3)...

Abstract

Sign comprehension is critical for effective driving, responses to warnings, and way-finding. Signs that are poorly comprehended by older people increase accident risk and may compromise independence. This study sought to determine whether iconic sign comprehension suffers in healthy aging and in the presence of cognitive impairment. Additionally, we examined whether the addition of text to iconic signage would increase comprehension in older adults. In Experiment 1, young adults, healthy older adults, and older adults with varying levels of cognitive impairment were asked the meaning of 65 signs used for driving, warnings, and way-finding. Healthy older adults were generally good at sign comprehension but had difficulty with way-finding signs. Older adults with cognitive impairment had poorer sign comprehension overall and particular difficulty with way-finding icons and signs that had icons only. In Experiment 2, healthy older adults were asked the meaning of signs containing icons only, or icons and text. A significant improvement in comprehension was found when text was added. An important implication of this work is that the assessment of sign comprehension needs to involve a broad and heterogeneous sample of older adults reflecting the range of perceptual and cognitive abilities represented in the population.

Bien comprendre les panneaux de signalisation est critique pour bien conduire aun véhicule, réagir aux avertissements, et s'orienter. Les aînés qui comprennent mal un panneau routier risquent davantage de subir un accident et de voir leur indépendance compromise. La présente étude visait à déterminer le degré de compréhension des pictogrammes par des aînés en bonne santé et des aînés souffrant de déficience. De plus, nous nous sommes demandé si l'ajout de texte aux pictogrammes permettrait aux aînés de les mieux comprendre. Lors de l'Expérience 1, nous avons demandé à des jeunes adultes, à des adultes plus âgés en bonne santé et aussi à des aînés souffrant de déficience cognitive à divers degrés, la signification de 65 panneaux routiers visant la conduite, les avertissements, et l'orientation. Les adultes plus âgés en bonne santé comprenaient bien la signalisation en général, mais avaient de la difficulté à déterminer ce que signifiait le panneau d'orientation. Les aînés souffrant de déficience cognitive comprenaient en général moins bien les panneaux routiers et en particulier les icônes d'orientation et les panneaux avec seulement un pictogramme. Au cours de l'Expérience 2, nous avons demandé à des aînés en bonne santé la signification de panneaux comportant seulement des icônes ou des icônes avec du texte. La compréhension était améliorée de façon importante lorsque le panneau comportait du texte. Ce travail a démontré que l'évaluation de la compréhension des panneaux de signalisation doit porter sur un vaste échantillon hétérogène d'adultes plus âgés dans l'échelle de capacités perceptuelles et cognitives représentées dans la population.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Requests for offprints should be sent to:/Les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à: C.T. Scialfa, Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, (scialfa@ucalgary.ca)

Footnotes

Hide All
*

This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the University of Calgary and by a Canadian Institutes for Health Research Strategic Training Grant on Communication and Social Interaction in Healthy Aging. Experiment 2 was completed in partial fulfillment of the degree requirements for Lindsay Dial.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Al-Madani, H., & Al-Janahi, A-R (2002). Assessment of drivers' comprehensions of traffic signs based on their traffic, personal and social characteristics. Transportation Research Record, Part F, 5, 6376.
American National Standards Institute (1998). Accredited standard on safety colors, signs, symbols, labels and tags. Z535.1–5 (rev.). Washington, DC: National Electrical Manufacturers Association.
Baltes, P., & Lindenberger, U. (1997). Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: A new window to the study of cognitive aging?. Psychology and Aging, 12, 1221.
Brashear, A., Unverzagt, F., Kuhn, E., Glazier, B., Farlow, M., Perkins, A., & Hui, S. (1998). Impaired traffic sign recognition in drivers with dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 13, 131137.
Candida, C., & Horberry, T. (Eds.). (2004). The human factors of transport signs. New York: CRC.
Carr, D., LaBarge, E., Dunnigan, K., & Storandt, M. (1998). Differentiating drivers with dementia of the Alzheimer type from healthy older persons with a traffic sign naming test. Journals of Gerontology: Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 53A, M135M139.
Craik, F.I.M. (1977). Human memory. In Birren, J., & Schaie, K.W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 384420). New York: van Nostrand Reinhold.
Crowell, T.A., Luis, C.A., Vanderploeg, R.D., Schinka, J.A., & Mullan, M. (2002). Memory patterns and executive functioning in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 9, 288297.
Dewar, R., Kline, D., & Swanson, A. (1996). Age differences in comprehension of traffic sign devices. Transportation Research Record, 1456, 110.
Federal Highway Administration (1988). Manual on uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
Flood, J., Morley, J. (2000). Age-related memory changes in learning, memory and memory processing. In Morley, J., Vellas, B.J., Armbrecht, H., Vellas, B., & Coe, R. (Eds.), The science of geriatrics (pp. 503513). New York: Springer.
Hale, S., & Myerson, J. (1996). Experimental evidence for differential slowing in the lexical and nonlexical domains. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 3, 112.
Halpern, D.F. (1984). Age differences in response time to verbal and symbolic traffic signs. Experimental Aging Research, 10, 201204.
Hancock, H., Fisk, A., & Rogers, W. (2005). Comprehending product warning information: Age related effects and the roles of memory, inferencing and knowledge. Human Factors, 4, 219234.
Hancock, H., Rogers, W., Schroeder, D., & Fisk, A. (2004). Safety symbol comprehension: Effects of symbol type, familiarity and age. Human Factors, 46, 183195.
Hebert, L., Scherr, P., Bienias, J., Bennett, D., & Evans, D. (2003). Alzheimer disease in the US population: Prevalence estimates using the 2000 Census. Archives of Neurology, 60, 11101122.
Higgins, K., Wood, J., & Tait, A. (1998). Vision and driving: Selective effect of optical blur on different driving tasks. Human Factors, 40, 224232.
Hough, M. (2004). Naming and category concept generation in older adults with and without dementia. Aphasiology, 18, 589597.
Hulbert, S., Beers, J., & Fowler, P. (1979). Motorists' understanding of traffic control devices. Falls Church, VA: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
International Organization for Standardization (1988). General principles for the creation of graphical symbols. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization ISO 3461-1.
Joshi, S., & Morley, J. (2006). Cognitive impairment. Medical Clinics of North America, 90, 769787.
Kline, D., Scialfa, C. (1997). Sensory and perceptual functioning: Basic research and human factors applications. In Fisk, A.D., & Rogers, W.A. (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and the older adult (pp. 2754). San Diego: Academic.
Kline, D.W., & Fuchs, P. (1993). The visibility of symbolic highway signs can be increased among drivers of all ages. Human Factors, 35, 2534.
Kline, T.J.B., Ghali, L.M., Kline, D.W., & Brown, S. (1990). Visibility distance of highway signs among young, middle-aged, and older observers: Icons are better than text. Human Factors, 32, 606619.
Lawton, M.P., & Brody, E.M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-monitoring and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9, 179186.
Light, L.L. (1996). Memory and aging. In Bjork, E.L., & Bjork, R.A. (Eds.), Memory (pp. 443490). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Maxwell, S.E., & Delaney, H.D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparisons perspective. (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services task force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 34, 939943.
Mitchell, R., Castleden, C., & Fanthome, Y. (1995). Driving, Alzheimer's disease and ageing: A potential cognitive screening device for all elderly drivers. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 10, 865869.
Moeur, R.C. (2006). Manual of traffic signs. Retrieved July 26, 2008, from http://www.trafficsign.us.
Molloy, W. (1999). The standardized mini mental status exam. Troy, ON: New Grange.
Morrell, R., Park, D.C., & Poon, L.W. (1990). Effects of labeling techniques on memory and comprehension of prescription information in young and old adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 45, 166172.
Morrrow, D.G., Leirer, V.O., & Andrassy, J.M. (1996). Using icons to convey medication schedule information. Applied Ergonomics, 27, 267275.
Morrow, D., Ridolfo, H., Menard, W., Sanborn, A., Stine-Morrow, E., Magnor, C., Herman, L., Teller, T., & Bryant, D. (2003). Environmental support promotes expertise-based mitigation of age differences on pilot communication tasks. Psychology and Aging, 18, 268284.
Morrow, D.G., Leirer, V.O., Andrassy, J.M., Tanke, E.D., & Stine-Morrow, E.A. (1996). Medication instruction design: Younger and older adult schemas for taking medication. Human Factors, 38, 556573.
Nickel, K., Lahmann, C., Muehlbacher, C., Gil, F., Buschmann, N., Fartacek, R., Leiberich, P., Tritt, K., Miterlehner, F., Kettler, C., Egger, C., Rother, W., & Loew, T. (2006). Change in instrumental activities of daily living disability in female senior patients with musculoskeletal pain: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 42, 247255.
Ringseis, E., & Caird, J. (1995). The comprehensibility and legibility of twenty pharmaceutical pictograms. Proceedings of the Human factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting. (pp. 974978). San Francisco: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Schneider, B.A., Pichora-Fuller, M.K. (2000). Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. In Craik, F.I.M., & Salthouse, T.A. (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed.), (pp. 155219), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Scialfa, C., Laberge, J., & Ho, G. (2004). Design of a way-finding system for geriatric long-term care: Using human factors to make living environments more accessible. Ergonomics in Design, 12, 511.
Shinar, D., Dewar, R., Summala, H., & Zakowska, L. (2003). Traffic sign symbol comprehension: A cross-cultural study. Ergonomics, 46, 15491565.
Sivak, M., & Olson, P. (1982). Nighttime legibility of traffic signs: Conditions eliminating the effects of driver age and disability glare. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 14, 8793.
Sojourner, R., & Wogalter, M. (1997). The influence of pictorials on evaluations of prescription medication instructions. Drug Information Journal, 31, 963972.
Sojourner, R., & Wogalter, M. (1998). The influence of pictorials on the comprehension and recall of pharmaceutical safety and warning information. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 2, 93106.
Stephens, E.C., Carswell, C.M., & Schumacher, M.M. (2006). Evidence for an elders' advantage in the naïve product usability judgments of older and younger adults. Human Factors, 48, 422433.
Stutts, J.C., Stewart, R., & Martell, C. (1998). Cognitive test performance and crash risk in an older driver population. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30, 337346.
Uc, E., Rizzo, M., Anderson, S., Shi, Q., & Dawson, J. (2005). Driver landmark and sign identification in early Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 76, 764768.
U.S. Department of Transportation (1998). Older driver highway design handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
Vittengl, J.R., White, C.N., McGovern, R.J., & Morton, B.J. (2006). Comparative validity of seven scoring systems for the instrumental activities of daily living scale in rural elders. Aging & Mental Health, 10, 4047.
White, N., Scott, A., Woods, R.T., Wenger, C.G., Keady, J.D., & Devakumar, M. (2002). The limited utility of the Mini-Mental State Examination in screening people over the age of 75 years for dementia in primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 52, 10021003.
Wild, K., & Cotrell, V. (2003). Identifying driving impairment in Alzheimer disease: A comparison of self and observer reports versus driving evaluation. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 17, 2734.
Willis, S. (2004). Technology and learning in current and future older cohorts. In Pew, R., & Van Hemel, S. (Eds.), Steering committee for the workshop on technology for adaptive aging (pp. 209229). Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Wogalter, M., Dejoy, D., & Laughery, K. (1999). Warnings and risk communication. London: Taylor and Francis.
Wolff, J., & Wogalter, M. (1993). Test and development of pharmaceutical pictorials. Interface, 93, 187192.
Wolff, J., & Wogalter, M. (1998). Comprehension of pictorial symbols: Effects of context and test method. Human Factors, 40, 173186.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
  • ISSN: 0714-9808
  • EISSN: 1710-1107
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-on-aging-la-revue-canadienne-du-vieillissement
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed