Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T14:12:28.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography prior to closure of atrial septal defects in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2005

Philippe Acar
Affiliation:
Unité de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, France
Daniel Roux
Affiliation:
Unité de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, France
Yves Dulac
Affiliation:
Unité de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, France
Pierre Rougé
Affiliation:
Unité de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, France
Yacine Aggoun
Affiliation:
Unité de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, France

Abstract

Aims: Our aims were to use transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography to assess the morphology of atrial septal defects in children prior to closure, and to compare the three-dimensional echocardiographic data with transcatheter and surgical findings. Methods and results:We used transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography in 62 consecutive patients, aged from 2 to 18 years, with atrial septal defects, measuring the maximal diameter and the extent of the rims. Subsequent to the study, we referred 42 patients for transcatheter closure, the rims being measured at greater than 4 mm. We found a good correlation between the maximal diameter of the defect as measured at transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography and using a balloon (y = 3.45 − 0.73x; r = 0.78; p < 0.0001), the mean difference between the measurements being 2.4 ± 2.8 mm. Successful closure with the Amplatzer septal occluder, having a mean size of 22 ± 4 mm, was achieved in 95% of the patients. Of the original cohort, 20 patients were referred for surgical closure. In these patients, the inferior rim had been deemed insufficient in 5, the postero-superior rim in 6, and the postero-inferior rim in 9. Complete agreement was found when the deficiency of the rim as judged using transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography was compared with intraoperative findings. The correlation between measurements of the deficiency of the rim achieved by transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography and at surgery was excellent (y = 0.2 + 0.98x; r = 0.93; p < 0.0001), the mean difference between the measurements being no more than 0.6 ± 0.4 mm. Conclusions: Transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography proved accurate in measuring the maximal diameter and rims of atrial septal defects within the oval fossa. This non-invasive method will be valuable in selecting children for transcatheter or surgical closure of such defects.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger F, Ewert P, Bjornstad PG, et al. Transcatheter closure as standard treatment for most interatrial defects: experience in 200 patients with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder. Cardiol Young 1999; 9: 468473.Google Scholar
Losay J, Petit J, Lambert V, et al. Percutaneous with Amplatzer device is a safe and efficient alternative to surgery in adults with large atrial septal defects. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 544548.Google Scholar
Chan KC, Godman MJ, Walsh K, Wilson N, Redington A, Gibbs JL. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect and interatrial communications with a new self expanding nitinol double disc device (Amplatzer septal occluder): multicentre UK experience. Heart 1999; 82: 300306.Google Scholar
Mehta R, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Pinheiro L, Samdarshi TE, Shah VK. Uses and limitations of transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of atrial septal defect in adults. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67: 288294.Google Scholar
Godart F, Rey C, Francart C, Jarrar M, Vaksmann G. Two-dimensional echocardiographic and color Doppler measurements of atrial septal defect, and comparison with the balloon-stretched diameter. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72: 10951097.Google Scholar
Faletra F, Scarpini S, Moreo A, et al. Color Doppler echocardiographic assessment of atrial septal defect size: correlation with surgical measurements. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1991; 4: 429434.Google Scholar
Hellenbrand WE, Fahey JT, McFowan FX, Weltin GG, Kleinman CS. Transesophageal echocardiographic guidance of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 207213.Google Scholar
Rao PS, Langhough R, Beekman RH, Lloyd TR, Sideris EB. Echocardiographic estimation of balloon-stretched diameter of secundum atrial septal defect for transcatheter occlusion. Am Heart J 1992; 124: 172175.Google Scholar
Acar P, Laskari C, Rhodes J, Pandian NG, Warner K, Marx G. Determinants of mitral regurgitation after atrioventricular septal defect surgery: a three-dimensional echocardiographic study. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 745749.Google Scholar
Magni G, Cao QL, Sugeng L, et al. Volume-rendered three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of the size, shape, and position of atrial septal defects: validation in an in vitro model. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 376381.Google Scholar
Acar P, Saliba Z, Bonhoeffer P, et al. Influence of atrial septal defect anatomy in patient selection and assessment of closure by the CardioSEAL device: a three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 573581.Google Scholar
Lange A, Walayat M, Turnbull CM, et al. Assessment of atrial septal defect morphology by transthoracic three dimensional echocardiography using standard grey scale and Doppler myocardial imaging techniques: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings. Heart 1997; 78: 382389.Google Scholar
Acar P, Maunoury C, Antonietti T, Bonnet D, Sidi D, Kachaner J. Left ventricular ejection fraction in children measured by three-dimensional echocardiography using a new transthoracic integrated 3D-probe. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 15831588.Google Scholar
Acar P, Saliba Z, Bonhoeffer P, Sidi D, Kachaner J. Assessment of the geometric profile of the Amplatzer and Cardioseal occluders by three-dimensional echocardiograpy. Heart 2001; 85: 451453.Google Scholar
Gu X, Han YM, Berry J, Urness M, Amplatz K. A new technique for sizing of atrial septal defects. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 46: 5157.Google Scholar
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307310.Google Scholar
Magni G, Hijazi Z, Pandian NG, et al. Two- and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in patient selection and assessment of atrial septal defect closure by the new DAS-Angel wings device. Circulation 1997; 96: 17221728.Google Scholar
Marx GR, Fulton DR, Pandian NG, et al. Delineation of site, relative size and dynamic geometry of atrial septal defect by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 482490.Google Scholar
Franke A, Kühl HP, Rulands D, et al. Quantitative analysis of the morphology of secundum-type atrial septal defects and their dynamic change using transesophageal three-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1997; 96 (suppl II): II-323327.Google Scholar
Acar P, Jones M, Shiota T, et al. Quantitative assessment of chronic aortic regurgitation using three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction: comparison with electromagnetic flow-meter measurements. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12: 138148.Google Scholar
De Simone R, Glombitza G, Vahl CF, Albers J, Meinzer HP, Hagl S. Three-dimensional color Doppler: a clinical study in patients with mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 16461654.Google Scholar
Chauvel C, Bogino E, Clerc P, et al. Usefulness of three-dimensional echocardiography for the evaluation of mitral valve prolapse: an intraoperative study. J Heart Valve Dis 2000; 9: 341349.Google Scholar
Acar P, Saliba Z, Sidi D, Kachaner J. New insight into the single ventricular function after total cavopulmonary connection: a three-dimensional echocardiographic study. Cardiol Young 2000; 10: 8389.Google Scholar