Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:22:58.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of the Cradle to Kinder programme for Aboriginal mothers and their children: perspectives from the women and their workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2020

Renée O’Donnell
Affiliation:
Monash Centre of Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
Muriel Bamblett
Affiliation:
The Victorian Aboriginal Child Care Agency (VACCA), Preston, Australia
Gabrielle Johnson
Affiliation:
The Victorian Aboriginal Child Care Agency (VACCA), Preston, Australia
Sue-Anne Hunter
Affiliation:
The Victorian Aboriginal Child Care Agency (VACCA), Preston, Australia
Kerry Stringer
Affiliation:
The Victorian Aboriginal Child Care Agency (VACCA), Preston, Australia
Shantai Croisdale
Affiliation:
The Victorian Aboriginal Child Care Agency (VACCA), Preston, Australia
Bengianni Pizzirani
Affiliation:
Monash Centre of Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
Darshini Ayton
Affiliation:
Monash Centre of Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
Melissa Savaglio
Affiliation:
Monash Centre of Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
Helen Skouteris*
Affiliation:
Monash Centre of Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia Warwick Business School, Warwick University, Coventry, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Helen Skouteris, Email: helen.skouteris@monash.edu

Abstract

This research was undertaken on the lands of the Wurundjeri people of the Kulin nation. We pay our respects to Elders of the past, present and emerging, and also acknowledge the generous contribution to this research made by women and their families and Victorian Aboriginal Child Care Agency (VACCA) staff. Aboriginal Cradle to Kinder (AC2K) is a home-visiting and advocacy programme focussed on promoting Aboriginal maternal and child health during both pre- and postnatal stages of parenthood which was delivered by VACCA, an Aboriginal Community Controlled Organisation. While there have been some feasibility assessments conducted on AC2K, no study to date has evaluated the impact of this programme from the perspective of neither the women nor the staff who deliver the programme. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate how both the women and the staff evaluated the AC2K programme, namely the strengths, limitations and recommendations of the programme. Through consultation with VACCA, this study used a qualitative approach using interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore the processes underpinning the programme coupled with participants’ experiences of the programme. A co-design process was used in the development of interview questions, and a total of seven women and six workers participated in semi-structured interviews. The results revealed three superordinate themes across both participant groups: cultural connection (i.e. how well the programme facilitates cultural connection), system complexities (i.e. caseloads, staff turnover and child protection [CP] difficulties) and programme features (i.e. parenting enhancement and unique programme benefits). The processes, and the programme more broadly, were evaluated positively by both the women and staff who supported its delivery. Specifically, a greater connection to culture, increased parenting skills and unique programme benefits were reported. However, there were recommendations on how the programme could be further strengthened, including negotiable caseloads with the Department and improved partnership with CP. These changes can help to further improve the experiences of both the women and their workers when engaging in Aboriginal specific maternal health and well-being supports.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). Child protection Australia 2016–17 (Child welfare series no. 68. Cat. No. CWS 63). AIHW. www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/66c7c364-592a-458c-9ab0-f90022e25368/aihw-cws-63xpdf.aspx?inline=true Google Scholar
Australian Psychological Society. (2007). Code of ethics.Google Scholar
Azzi-Lessing, L. (2011). Home visitation programs: Critical issues and future directions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(4), 387398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bainbridge, R., Tsey, K., McCalman, J., Kinchin, I., Saunders, V., Lui, F. W., Cadet-James, Y., Miller, A., & Lawson, K. (2015). No one’s discussing the elephant in the room: Contemplating questions of research impact and benefit in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian health research. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bair-Merritt, M. H., Jennings, J. M., Chen, R., Burrell, L., McFarlane, E., Fuddy, L., & Duggan, A. K. (2010). Reducing maternal intimate partner violence after the birth of a child: A randomized controlled trial of the Hawaii Healthy Start Home Visitation Program. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(1), 1623.Google ScholarPubMed
Broadhurst, K., & Mason, C. (2017). Birth parents and the collateral consequences of court-ordered child removal: Towards a comprehensive framework. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 31(1), 4159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunton, G., O’Mara-Eves, A., & Thomas, J. (2014). The ‘active ingredients’ for successful community engagement with disadvantaged expectant and new mothers: A qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(12), 28472860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, S., McCalman, J., Redman-MacLaren, M., Canuto, K., Vine, K., Sewter, J., & McDonald, M. (2018). Implementing the Baby One Program: A qualitative evaluation of family-centred child health promotion in remote Australian Aboriginal communities. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancock, H. (2007). Low birth weight in Aboriginal babies—A need for rethinking Aboriginal women’s pregnancies and birthing. Women and Birth, 20(2), 7780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. (2006). Trying to make a difference: A critical analysis of health care during pregnancy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2, 47.Google Scholar
Hycner, R. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8(3), 279303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. (2010). Creating the missing feedback loop. IDS Bulletin, 41(6), 5664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongen, C., McCalman, J., Bainbridge, R., & Tsey, K. (2014). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander maternal and child health and wellbeing: A systematic search of programs and services in Australian primary health care settings. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1), 251.Google ScholarPubMed
Kemp, L., Harris, E., McMahon, C., Matthey, S., Vimpani, G., Anderson, T., Schmied, V., Aslam, H., & Zapart, S. (2011). Child and family outcomes of a long-term nurse home visitation programme: A randomised controlled trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 96(6), 533540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kildea, S., Kruske, S., Barclay, L., & Tracy, S. (2010). ‘Closing the Gap’: How maternity services can contribute to reducing poor maternal infant health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. Rural and Remote Health, 10(3), 1383.Google ScholarPubMed
Larkin, M., Watts, S., & Clifton, E. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 102120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynes, M. J., Pierce, J. L., & Laslett, B. (2012). Telling stories: The use of personal narratives in the social sciences and history. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morriss, L. (2018). Haunted futures: The stigma of being a mother living apart from her child (ren) as a result of state-ordered court removal. The Sociological Review, 66(4), 816831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Health and Medical Research Council. (2018). Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders. Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H., Zarnowiecki, D., Segal, L., Gent, D., Silver, B., & Boffa, J. (2018). Feasibility of implementing infant home visiting in a Central Australian Aboriginal community. Prevention Science, 19(7), 966976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olds, D. L., Eckenrode, J., Henderson, C. R., Kitzman, H., Powers, J., Cole, R., Sidora, K., Morris, P., Pettitt, L. M., & Luckey, D. (1997). Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect: Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(8), 637643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 6576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, P., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.Google Scholar
Sturges, J. E., & Hanrahan, K. J. (2004). Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 4(1), 107118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Waeyenberg, T., Decramer, A., & Anseel, F. (2015). Home nurses’ turnover intentions: The impact of informal supervisory feedback and self-efficacy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(12), 28672878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willows, N. D. (2005). Determinants of healthy eating in Aboriginal peoples in Canada: The current state of knowledge and research gaps. Canadian Journal of Public Health/Revue Canadienne de Sante’e Publique, 96, S32S36.Google ScholarPubMed