Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:05:37.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Placement disruption and dislocation in South Australian substitute care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Paul H. Delfabbro ,
James G. Barber  and
Lesley Cooper
James G. Barber
Affiliation:
Social Administration & Social Work
Lesley Cooper
Affiliation:
Social Administration & Social Work
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the degree of disruption experienced by 235 children aged 4–17 years placed into substitute care in South Australia during 1998–1999. Key measures of disruption included: the frequency of placement changes, the number of children forced to change school, the geographical distance from birth families, and the amount of planned contact between children and families during the placement. Parental contact was reduced when children were victims of abuse, but more likely when children were placed because of parental incapacity. Changes in school were more likely when children were older or were placed a long way from their families. Geographical dislocation was, as expected, more likely to be a feature of rural placements, although there were no rural-metropolitan differences in the nature and frequency of family contact. The implications of these findings for future research are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , 2000 , pp. 16 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bath, H. (1998) ‘Trends and issues in the out-of-home care of children in Australia’, International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 98, 2, 103–114.Google Scholar
Bilson, A. & Barker, R. (1995) ‘Parental contact with children fostered and in residential care after the Children Act 1989’, British Journal of Social Work, 25, 367–381.Google Scholar
Blome, W. (1997) ‘What happens to foster kids: educational experiences of a random sample of foster care youth and a match group of non-foster care youth’, Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 14, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantos, A.L., Gries, L.T. & Slis, V. (1997) ‘Behavioral correlates of parental visiting during family foster care’, Child Welfare, 56, 309–329.Google Scholar
Clark, R. (1997) A review of intensive out-of-home care support services, Sydney: NSW Department of Community Services.Google Scholar
Combs-Orme, T., Chernoff, R.G. & Kagar, V.A. (1991) ‘Utilization of health care by foster children: application of a theoretical model’, Children and Youth Services Review, 13, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Family and Community Services (1996) A policy for the planning: Purchasing and delivery of alternative care services in South Australia.Google Scholar
Fanshel, D. (1992) ‘Foster care as a two-tiered system’, Children and Youth Services Review, 14, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, T.L., Tracy, G.S. & DeBord, M.S. (1984) ‘An analysis of variables affecting length of stay in foster care’, Children and Youth Services Review, 6,133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J.M., Byrne, B. & Workman, L.J. (1995) ‘An intensive reunification program for children in foster care’, Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 12, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, P. (1988) ‘Case and context: determinants of planned visit frequency in foster family care’, Child Welfare, 67, 311–325.Google Scholar
Hornby, H.C. & Collins, M.I. (1981) ‘Teenagers in foster care: the forgotten majority’, Children and Youth Services Review, 3, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, A. (1993) ‘Adolescents in foster care: predicting behavioral maladjustment’, Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 6, 521–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, J.L. (1987) ‘An ecological perspective on duration of foster care’, Child Welfare, 66, 113–123.Google Scholar
Palmer, S.E. (1996) ‘Placement stability and inclusive practice in foster care: an empirical study’, Children and Youth Services Review, 7, 589–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardeck, J.T. (1983) ‘An empirical analysis of behavioral and emotional problems of foster children as related to re-placement in care’, Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tam, T.S.K. & Ho, M.K.W. (1996) ‘Factors influencing the prospect of children returning to their parents from out-of-home care’, Child Welfare, 55, 253–268.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J.K., Overstreet, E.J., Grasso, A., Tripoldi, T. & Boylan, F. (1988) ‘Multiple indicators of success in residential youth care and treatment’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 143–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed