Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Sex Offender Risk Assessments in the Child Protection Context. Helpful or Not?

  • Karen Broadley (a1)
Abstract

When a convicted or alleged child sex offender is living, or having contact, with his own children or stepchildren, the obvious worry is that these children are victims or will become victims of sexual abuse. One way of determining the risk of this occurring is for the convicted or alleged offender to undergo a forensic sex offender risk assessment. In this article I raise questions regarding the usefulness of sex offender risk assessments within the statutory child protection context. Most importantly, I ask whether static and dynamic risk assessment instruments can accurately predict the risk an alleged or convicted sex offender poses to his own children. I conclude that ‘high’, ‘moderate’, and ‘low’ risk outcomes of forensic sex offender risk assessments in the child protection context are unreliable and can result in error, and explain that these errors have consequences that, within the child protection context, have consequences that can be dangerous to children.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Allan, M., Grace, R.C., Rutherford, B., & Hudson, S.M. (2007). Psychometric assessment of dynamic risk factors for child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 347367.
Bacon, H. (2008). Cleveland 20 years on: What have we learned about intervening in child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Review, 17, 215229.
Barbaree, H.E., Langton, C.M., & Peacock, E.J. (2006). Different actuarial risk measures produce different risk rankings for sexual offenders. Sex Abuse, 18, 423440.
Berlin, F.S., Galbreath, N.W., Geary, B., & McGlone, G. (2003). The use of actuarial at civil commitment hearings to predict the likelihood of future sexual violence. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 377382.
Beyer, L.R., Higgins, D.J., & Bromfield, L.M. (2005). Understanding organisational risk factors for child maltreatment: A review of literature. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Davies, J. (2010a). Victoria Police sorry for child-sex bungle, Australian, 27 August.
Davies, J. (2010b). Psychologists publish sex offender information, Australian, 7 September.
Doyle, D.J., & Ogloff, J.P.R. (2009). Calling the tune without music: A psycho-legal analysis of Australia's post-sentence legislation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42, 179203.
Edens, J.J., Hart, S.D., Johnson, D.W., Johnson, J.K., & Oliver, M.E. (2000). Use of the personality assessment inventory to assess psychopathy in offender populations. Psychological Assessment, 12 (2), 132139.
Goddard, C., Saunders, B.J., Stanley, J.R., & Tucci, J. (1999). Structured risk assessment procedures: Instruments of abuse? Child Abuse Review, 8, 251263.
Gordon, H., & Grubin, D. (2004). Psychiatric aspects of the assessment and treatment of sex offenders. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10, 7380.
Hanson, R.K. (2000, January). Risk assessment. Beaverton, OR: Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers.
Harcourt, B.E. (2007). Against prediction: Profiling, policing and punishing in an actuarial age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Harris, A.J. (2006). Risk assessment and sex offender community supervision: A context specific framework. Federal Probation, 70 (2).
Harris, A., Phenix, A., Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (2003). Static-99 coding rules revised 2003. Retrieved from www.static99.org
Harris, G.T., & Rice, M.E. (2007). Characterizing the value of actuarial violence risk assessments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34 (12), 16381658.
Itzin, C. (2001). Incest, pedophilia, pornography and prostitution: Making familial males more visible as the abusers. Child Abuse Review, 10, 3548.
Johnson, S.A. (2007). Physical abusers and sexual offenders forensic and clinical strategies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kemshall, H., & McIvor, G. (Eds.). (2004). Sex offenders: Managing the risk-research highlights in social work. London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
Lamont, A. (2010). Effects of child abuse and neglect for adult survivors [Resource sheet]. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Langton, C.M., Barbaree, H.E., Seto, M.C., Peacock, E.J., Harkins, L., & Hansen, K.T. (2007). Actuarial assessment of risk for reoffence among adult sex offenders: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of the Static 2002 and five other instruments. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 34, 3759.
Logan, W.A. (2000). A study in ‘actuarial justice’: Sex offender classification practice and procedure. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 3, 593637.
Mossman, D. (2006). Another look at interpreting risk categories. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 29 (1), 4163.
Palk, G.R., Freeman, J.E., & Davey, J.D. (2008). Australian forensic psychologists perspective on the utility of actuarial versus clinical assessment for predicting recidivism among sex offenders. In Proceedings 18th Conference of the European Association of Psychology and the Law, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Proeve, M. (2009). A preliminary examination of specific risk assessment for sexual offenders against children. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18:583593.
Ruiz, M.A., Drake, E.B., Glass, A., Marcotte, D., & van Gorp, W.G. (2002). Trying to beat the system: Misuse of the internet to assist in avoiding the detection of psychological symptom dissimulation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33 (3), 294299.
Ward, T., & Beech, A.R. (2004). The etiology of risk: a preliminary model. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16 (4), 271284.
Wright, S. (2003). Managing unacceptable risk: The risk assessment and management of child sexual offenders. Paper presented at the Child Sexual Abuse: Justice Response or Alternative Resolution Conference, convened by the Australian Institute of Criminology in Adelaide, South Australia.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Children Australia
  • ISSN: 1035-0772
  • EISSN: 2049-7776
  • URL: /core/journals/children-australia
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 23 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 184 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.