Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:05:02.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

China's Push Through the South China Sea: The Interaction of Bureaucratic and National Interests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Extract

Over the past decade a highly significant development has attracted little scholarly attention: the steady expansion of Chinese power in the South China Sea. There were several excellent studies of this process through the very early 1980s, but these ended well before China's push from the Paracel Islands to the Spratly Islands in 1988. Indeed, they disagreed about whether China would actually do this. By the early 1990s China had pushed into the Spratlys and built up a relatively strong base there. It is thus time to look anew at China's activities in that region.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Samuels, Marwyn S., Contest for the South China Sea (New York and London: Methuen, 1982)Google Scholar. Lo, Chi-kin, China's Policy Towards Territorial Disputes. The Case of the South China Sea Islands (New York & London: Routledge, 1989)Google Scholar. Muller, David, China's Emergence as a Maritime Power (Boulder: Westview, 1983), pp. 152–54Google Scholar. Segal, Gerald, Defending China (New York & London: Oxford University Press, 1985), pp. 197210.Google Scholar

2. Chi-kin Lo had speculated that China would not advance from the Paracels to the Spratlys in the immediate future. Marwyn Samuels predicted it would.

3. Dangdai Zhongguo haijun (The Modern Chinese Navy), compiled by the Editorial Committee on the Modern Chinese Navy with former PLA-N commander Xiao Jingguang and former vice-PLA-N commander Liu Daosheng as “advisers” and former deputy PLA-N commander and chief of staff Yang Guoyu as chief editor (Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 1987)Google Scholar. Haijunshi (Naval History), compiled by the PLA-N historical compilation committee headed by then current PLA-N commander Liu Huaqing (Beijing: Jiefangjun chubanshe, 1989)Google Scholar. The editorial committees of both books include many retired high-ranking PLA-N officers. Their content is very similar, except that the 1989 book includes significant later information. Especially important for this article is information dealing with the background of the March 1988 clash in the Spratlys. Neither book is neibu.

4. One of the banes of research on the South China Sea is the existence of multiple names (Chinese, Vietnamese, Filipino and English) for the same obscure topographic feature. Use of a particular language can imply acceptance ofthat country's claims or, at least, accustoms people to think of a particular region in terms of the vocabulary provided by a particular government. For the sake of academic impartiality, I will use English names. An invaluable cross-listing of names is available in JPRS Report, China, Reference Aid, South China Sea Placenames, Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS), JPRS-CAR-90-058, 6 08 1990.Google Scholar

5. The Modern Chinese Navy, pp. 581–82.Google Scholar

6. Ibid. pp. 547–48.

7. Hainan class fast attack craft have a displacement of 375 tons and a crew of 69. They are armed with two twin 57 mm. guns and two twin 25 mm. machine guns. The PLA-N mine sweepers had a 520 ton displacement with a crew of 70. They were armed with two twin 37 mm. guns, two twin 25 mm. and two twin 14.5 mm. machine guns. Janes Fighting Ships, 1989–90 (London: Janes Defence Data, 1990), pp. 109, 111.Google Scholar

8. See sources cited in n. 1.

9. Mouhong, Xue (ed.), Dangdai Zhongguo waijiao (Contemporary Chinese Foreign Relations) (Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan, 1987), neibu pp. 272–74.Google Scholar

10. The Modern Chinese Navy, pp. 392–99.Google Scholar

11. Ying, Fan, Ye Jianying zai 1976 (Ye Jianying in 1976) (Beijing: Zhonggong dangxiao chubanshe, 1990), p. 48.Google Scholar

12. The Modern Chinese Navy, pp. 547–48.Google Scholar

13. Contemporary Chinese Foreign Relations, p. 271.Google Scholar

14. Ibid.

15. Chanda, Nayan, Brother Enemy. The War After the War (New York: Collier Books, 1988), pp. 1920.Google Scholar

16. Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Zhongguo waijiao nianjian, 1989 (Almanac of Chinese Foreign Relations, 1989 (Beijing: Shijie zhishi chubanshe, 12 1989), p. 51.Google Scholar

17. China's Foreign Relations, A Chronology of Events, (1949–1988) (Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1989), p. 271.Google Scholar

18. Da gong bao, 27 11 1975Google Scholar, cited in Chanda, , Brother Enemy, p. 30.Google Scholar

19. The Modern Chinese Navy, pp. 581–82.Google Scholar

20. 1986 Zhongguo haiyang nianjian (1986 China Oceanographie Almanac) (Beijing: Haiyangju, 1988), pp. 404405.Google Scholar

21. The Modern Chinese Navy, p. 707.Google Scholar

22. Liushi nian dashiji (1927–1987) (60-Year Chronology (1927–1987)) (Beijing: Junshi kexue chubanshe, 1988), p. 800.Google Scholar

23. The Modern Chinese Navy, p. 481.Google Scholar

24. Ibid. p. 712.

25. Beijing Radio, 31 01 1980Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 31 01 1980, p. E13.Google Scholar

26. The Modern Chinese Navy, pp. 569570.Google Scholar

27. Chronology of Events, pp. 300, 304.Google Scholar

28. Foreign Broadcast Information Service, Daily Report, Asia and Pacific (FBIS–Asia & Pacific), 26 05 1981, p. K2.Google Scholar

29. The Modern Chinese Navy, p. 482.Google Scholar

30. 1986 Oceanographic Almanac, pp. 404405.Google Scholar

31. AFP, Hong Kong, 10 07 1983Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 12 07 1983, pp. K1516.Google Scholar

32. Vice-admiral Xusan, Zhang, “First naval ocean cruise,” in Jianchuan and zhishi (Naval and Merchant Ships)Google Scholar, in JPRS Report, China, JPRS-CAR-90-057, 31 07 1990, pp. 3841.Google Scholar

33. Ibid. p. 40.

34. Hanoi Radio, 26 06 1983Google Scholar, in FBIS–Asia & Pacific, 27 06 1983, p. K3.Google Scholar

35. 1986 Oceanographie Almanac, p. 405.Google Scholar

36. Naval History, p. 323.Google Scholar

37. Beijing Radio, 9 06 1987Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 11 06 1987, p. K13.Google Scholar

38. Zhongguo xinwenshe, 4 12 1987Google Scholar, FBIS–CHI, 4 12 1987, p. 12Google Scholar. Xinhua, , 2 12 1987Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 2 12 1987, p. 21.Google Scholar

39. The Modern Chinese Navy, pp. 324–25.Google Scholar

40. Da gong bao, 26 05 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 27 05 1988, pp. 89Google Scholar. Wen hui bao, 25 05 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 25 05 1988, p. 5Google Scholar. Wen hui bao, 15 03 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 15 03 1988, pp. 34.Google Scholar

41. Naval History, p. 324.Google Scholar

42. Ibid. pp. 324–25.

43. Ibid. p. 325.

44. Da gong bao, 26 05 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 27 05 1988, pp. 89.Google Scholar

45. Naval History, p. 325.Google Scholar

46. FBIS–CHI, 29 12 1988, p. 12.Google Scholar

47. FBIS–CHI, 15 03 1988, p. 3.Google Scholar

48. This is the same number given by a Chinese foreign ministry statement in May 1988 for the Spratly islands and reefs occupied by Vietnam since January 1988. “Memorandum of the Chinese Foreign Ministry on Xisha and Nansha Islands,” Embassy of the People's Republic of China, Washington, D.C., No. 14, 12 05 1988.Google Scholar

49. Da gong bao, 8 05 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 9 05 1988, pp. 68.Google Scholar

50. Naval History, p. 326.Google Scholar

51. Wen hui bao, 15 03 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 15 03 1988, pp. 34.Google Scholar

52. Naval History, p. 326.Google Scholar

53. AFP, Hong Kong, 9 05 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 9 05 1988, p. 6.Google Scholar

54. Ibid.

55. Naval History, p. 326.Google Scholar

56. Wen hui bao, 25 05 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 25 05 1988, pp. 56.Google Scholar

57. Almanac of Chinese Foreign Relations, 1989, pp. 5051.Google Scholar

58. Wen hui bao, 25 05 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 25 05 1988, pp. 56.Google Scholar

59. Da gong bao, 27 05 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 27 05 1988, p. 8.Google Scholar

60. Jiefangjun bao, 30 04 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 19 05 1988, pp. 1213.Google Scholar

61. Wen hui bao, 25 05 1988, in FBIS–CHI, 25 05 1988, pp. 56.Google Scholar

62. Guangdong Radio, in FBIS–CHI, 9 03 1989, p. 35.Google Scholar

63. FBIS–CHI, 6 06 1989, p. 9.Google Scholar

64. Da gong bao, 15 03 1989Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 17 03 1989, p. 5Google Scholar. Also, Guangdong Radio, in FBIS–CHI, 9 03 1989, p. 35.Google Scholar

65. Xusan, Zhang, “First naval ocean cruise.”Google Scholar

66. South China Morning Post, 5 10 1989Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 5 10 1989, pp. 1314.Google Scholar

67. Xinhua, , 6 05 1989Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 8 05 1989, p. 14Google Scholar; Xinhua, , 25 05 1989Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 25 05 1989, p. 1Google Scholar. The Far Eastern Economic Review reported in its 19 May 1989 issue that in April 1989 Chinese forces took over an atoll previously held by Vietnamese forces. During 1990 and 19921 asked numerous diplomats in Beijing about this report, but none credited it.

68. Xinhua, , 26 09 1989Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 28 09 1989, p. I.Google Scholar

69. Xinhua, , “China refutes Vietnamese incorporation of Chinese territory,” 13 07 1989Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 13 07 1989, p. 1.Google Scholar

70. Xinhua, , 28 09 1989Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 28 09 1989, p. 1.Google Scholar

71. China Daily, 24 12 1989.Google Scholar

72. Xinhua, , 4 04 1990Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 11 04 1990, p. 24.Google Scholar

73. Xinhua, , 5 04 1990Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 6 04 1990, p. 8.Google Scholar

74. Guoxing, Ji, The Spratly's Disputes and Prospects for Settlement (Malaysia: Institute of Strategic and International Studies), pp. 2, 10Google Scholar. The specification of Chinese holdings is in Da gong bao, 23 01 1992Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 29 01 1992, p. 42Google Scholar. See also, “Treacherous shoals,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 13 08 1992, p. 15.Google Scholar

75. Chanda, Nayan and Cheung, Tai Ming, “Reef knots,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 30 08 1990, p. 11.Google Scholar

76. Lanying, Wang, “Avoid conflicts, make joint efforts for development-Wang Yingfan, Director of Asian Affairs Department of the Foreign Ministry, on the seminar on the South Sea issue,” Liaowang, 5 08 1991Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 9 08 1991, pp. 1315.Google Scholar

77. Vatikiotis, Michael and Cheung, Tai Ming, “Maritime hegemony,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 10 06 1991, p. 11.Google Scholar

78. Da gong bao, 23 01 1992Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 29 01 1992, pp. 4243.Google Scholar

79. The text of the law is in Renmin ribao, 26 02 1992, p. 4Google Scholar. An English translation is in Shortwave Broadcasts, FE/1316, 28 02 1992, p. C1/1.Google Scholar

80. Regarding the Crestone deal see: China Daily, 9 05 1992, p. 1Google Scholar; Kristof, Nicholas D., “China and U.S. company sign oil deal for disputed waters,” New York Times, 18 06 1992, p. 7AGoogle Scholar; Vatikiotis, Michael, “China stirs the pot,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 9 07 1992, pp. 1415Google Scholar; The Denver Post, 19 06 1992Google Scholar. The co-ordinates of the Crestone tract are given in Oil & Gas Journal, 13 07 1992, pp. 2021.Google Scholar

81. Kyodo News Service, Tokyo, in FBIS–CHI, 27 02 1992, pp. 1516.Google Scholar

82. “Adhere to the Four Basic Principles,” Deng Xiaoping wenxuan (Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping) (Beijing, 03 1983)Google Scholar, in China Report, Political, Sociological, and Military Affairs, No. 468, JPRS 84651, 31 10 1983, p. 127.Google Scholar

83. Wenyi, Cai, “Reefs, islands, oceans, and the future of a nation,” Jiefangjun bao, 11 03 1988Google Scholar, in JPRS Report, China, JPRS-CAR-88-018, pp. 3334.Google Scholar

84. Fuquan, Tang, “Reunderstanding our country's naval strategy,” Jiefangjun bao, 15 09 1989Google Scholar, in JPRS Report, China, JPRS-CAR-89-109, pp. 5557.Google Scholar

85. Ibid.

86. Muller, , China's Emergence, pp. 168174.Google Scholar

87. Quoted in Samuels, , Contest, p. 145.Google Scholar

88. Muller, , China's Emergence, pp. 168–69.Google Scholar

89. Ibid. pp. 206–207.

90. The Modern Chinese Navy, pp. 522–23.Google Scholar

91. Other primary missions mentioned by Muller were defence against the Soviet maritime threat and the liberation of Taiwan. Secondary missions included protecting Chinese commerce on the high seas and strategic deterrence provided by submarine-launched ballistic missiles.

92. Xinhua, , Beijing, 12 08 1984Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 13 08 1984, pp. K12.Google Scholar

93. Anming, Gao, “Navy to participate in economic reform drive,” China Daily, 6 04 1992, p. 4.Google Scholar

94. Beijing Radio, 5 05 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 10 05 1988, pp. 2425.Google Scholar

95. Far Eastern Economic Review, 7 11 1980, p. 9.Google Scholar The reference to the role of the CMC and the State Council is from The Modern Chinese Navy, pp. 557–58.Google Scholar

96. The Modern Chinese Navy, p. 559.Google Scholar

97. FBIS–CHI, 19 09 1991, p. K11.Google Scholar

98. The Modern Chinese Navy, pp. 561–62.Google Scholar

99. Janes Fighting Ships, 1989–90, p. 118.Google Scholar

100. The Modern Chinese Navy, pp. 562, 637.Google Scholar

101. Ibid. p. 562.

102. “Navy now capable of long-range navigation.” xinwenshe, Zhongguo, 29 03 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 31 03 1988, pp. 3839.Google Scholar“Navy chief on technical tactical upgrading,” Beijing Radio, 5 05 1989Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 10 05 1988, pp. 2425.Google Scholar

103. Yanwen, Si, “Chinese fleet partrols Nansha Islands,” Jiefangjun bao, 19 05 1988Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 27 05 1988, p. 9.Google Scholar

104. See his comments to NPC delegates in FBIS–CHI, 26 03 1992, p. 17 and 6 April 1992, p. 31.Google Scholar

105. Lewis, John W., Di, Hua and Litai, Xue, “Beijing's defense establishment,” International Security, Vol. 15, No. 4 (Spring 1991), pp. 87109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

106. Da gong bao, 23 01 1992Google Scholar, in FBIS–CHI, 29 01 1992, p. 42.Google Scholar

107. “Sulian jubian zhihou Zhongguo de xianshi yingdui yu zhanlue xuanze” (“The realities to be faced in China in the wake of dramatic changes in the USSR and strategic choices”), Zhongguo qingnian bao (Beijing, 9 09 1991).Google Scholar