Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-mqrwx Total loading time: 0.383 Render date: 2022-12-02T08:39:45.043Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

The Rise of the Chinese Security State*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2015

Yuhua Wang*
Affiliation:
The University of Pennsylvania.
Carl Minzner
Affiliation:
Fordham Law School. Email: cminzner@law.fordham.edu.
*
Email: yuhuaw@sas.upenn.edu (corresponding author).

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the Chinese domestic security apparatus has expanded dramatically. “Stability maintenance” operations have become a top priority for local Chinese authorities. We argue that this trend goes back to the early 1990s, when central Party authorities adopted new governance models that differed dramatically from those of the 1980s. They increased the bureaucratic rank of public security chiefs within the Party apparatus, expanded the reach of the Party political-legal apparatus into a broader range of governance issues, and altered cadre evaluation standards to increase the sensitivity of local authorities to social unrest. We show that the origin of these changes lies in a policy response to the developments of 1989–1991, namely the Tiananmen democracy movement and the collapse of communist political systems in Eastern Europe. Over the past twenty years, these practices have developed into an extensive stability maintenance apparatus, whereby local governance is increasingly oriented around the need to respond to social unrest, whether through concession or repression. Chinese authorities now appear to be rethinking these developments, but the direction of reform remains unclear.

摘要

在过去的 20 多年中, 中国的国内维稳体系经历了大幅的扩展, 维护社会稳定成为地方政府工作的重中之重。我们提出这一趋势源于 90 年代初期党中央采取的一系列有别于 80 年代的治理模式。这一模式提高了公安部门领导在整个官僚体系中的地位, 扩大了党的政法系统对一系列治理领域的影响, 以及将社会稳定纳入到了地方干部考核体制中。我们认为这些变化是政府对 1989 至 1991 年间的事件--即天安门民主运动和东欧共产党政权的倒台--的政策回应。经过 20 多年的发展, 这些政策已经促成了一个庞大的维稳体系。在这一体系中, 地方治理的重心日益围绕着如何应对社会抗争进行, 或是妥协或是镇压。中国政府正在重新考量这一体系, 但改革的方向尚不明朗。

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Both authors contributed equally to the research and writing of this article. Yuhua Wang wants to thank Bill Alford for suggestions and Alice Xie, Chenyang Lei and Yichao Cen for providing excellent research assistance. Carl Minzner thanks Xie Yue, Hou Meng and all the organizers and participants at conferences and workshops where this paper was presented for their comments. Both authors want to thank The China Quarterly editors and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

References

Bellin, Eva. 2012. “Reconsidering the robustness of authoritarianism in the Middle East.” Comparative Politics 44, 127149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddulph, Sarah. 2007. Legal Reform and Administrative Detention in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birney, Mayling. 2013. “Decentralization and veiled corruption under China's rule of mandates.” World Development 53, 5567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Yongshun. 2006. State and Laid-Off Workers in Reform China: The Silence and Collective Action of the Retrenched. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chen, Xi. 2012. Social Protest and Contentious Authoritarianism in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Sarah, and Lemish, Leeshai. 2011. “The 610 office: policing the Chinese spirit.” Jamestown Foundation China Brief 11(17), 69.Google Scholar
Deng, Yanhua, and O'Brien, Kevin J.. 2013. “Relational repression in China: using social ties to demobilize protesters.” The China Quarterly 215, 533552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, Bruce. 2003. Red Capitalists in China: The Party, Private Entrepreneurs, and Prospects for Political Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, Michael. 2005. Policing Chinese Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Mary E. 2002. “Reform and openness: why China's economic reforms have delayed democracy.” World Politics 54(3), 338372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Xuezhi. 2012. China's Security State: Philosophy, Evolution, and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgott, Richard. 2004. “US foreign policy and the ‘securitization' of economic globalization.” International Politics 41(2), 147175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, Meng. 2013. “Dang yu zhengfa guanxi de zhankai – yi zhengfa weiyuanhui wei yanjiu zhongxin.” (The relationship between Party and political-legal institutions: focusing research on political-legal committees). Faxuejia 1(2), 115.Google Scholar
Lam, Willy. 2012. “Chen Guangcheng shows dim prospects for political-legal reform in China.” Jamestown Foundation China Brief 12(10), 35.Google Scholar
Landry, Pierre F. 2008. Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party's Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, Benjamin L. 2013. “Malpractice mobs: medical dispute resolution in China.” Columbia Law Review 113, 181262.Google Scholar
Lorentzen, Peter L. 2013. “Regularizing rioting: permitting public protest in an authoritarian regime.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8(2), 127158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Kricheli, Ruth. 2010. “Political order and one-party rule.” Annual Review of Political Science 13, 123143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. 2006. “Xinfang: an alternative to formal Chinese legal institutions.” Stanford Journal of International Law 42, 103179.Google Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. 2009. “Riots and cover-ups: counterproductive control of local agents in China.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 31, 53123.Google Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. 2011. “China's turn against law.” American Journal of Comparative Law 59, 935984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. 2013. “The turn against legal reform.” Journal of Democracy 24, 6572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Andrew. 2003. “Authoritarian resilience.” Journal of Democracy 14, 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Kevin, and Li, Lianjiang. 1999. “Selective policy implementation in rural China.” Comparative Politics 31(2), 167186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Kevin, and Li, Lianjiang. 2006. Rightful Resistance in Rural China. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Elizabeth. 2012. Anyuan: Mining China's Revolutionary Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiao, Shi. 2012. Qiao Shi tan minzhu yu fazhi (Qiao Shi on Democracy and Rule of Law). Beijing: Renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, David. 2002. Modernizing China's Military: Progress, Problems and Prospects. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockmann, Daniela. 2012. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Harold M. 1994. “Crime and Punishment in China, 1979–1989.” PhD diss., Columbia University.Google Scholar
Tanner, Harold M. 1999. Strike Hard! Anti-Crime Campaigns and Chinese Criminal Justice, 1979–1985. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, Murray Scott. 2000. “State coercion and the balance of awe: the 1983–1986 ‘stern blows’ anti-crime campaign.” The China Journal 44, 93125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Murray Scott, and Green, Eric. 2007. “Principals and secret agents: central versus local control over policing and obstacles to ‘rule of law’ in China.” The China Quarterly 191, 644670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Trevaskes, Susan. 2007. Courts and Criminal Justice in Contemporary China. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Tsai, Kellee S. 2006. “Adaptive informal institutions and endogenous institutional change in China.” World Politics 59, 116141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yuhua. 2014. “Empowering the police: how the Chinese Communist Party manages its coercive leaders.” The China Quarterly 219, 625648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Jessica. 2013. “Autocratic signaling, mass audiences and nationalist protest in China.” International Organization 67(1), 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, Susan. 2004. “The cadre evaluation system at the grassroots: the paradox of Party rule.” In Naughton, Barry and Yang, Dali (eds.), Holding China Together: Diversity and National Integration in the Post-Deng Era. New York: Cambridge University Press, 101119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Yue. 2012. “The political logic of weiwen in contemporary China.” Issues and Studies 48, 139.Google Scholar
Xie, Yue. 2013. Weiwen de zhengzhi luoji (The Political Logic of Stability Maintenance). Hong Kong: Tsinghua Bookstore.Google Scholar
Zhao, Suisheng. 1998. “A state-led nationalism.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 31(3), 287302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Yongkun. 2012. “Lun dangwei zhengfa weiyuanhui de gaige” (On the reforms of Party political-legal committees). Faxue 5, 57.Google Scholar
91
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Rise of the Chinese Security State*
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Rise of the Chinese Security State*
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Rise of the Chinese Security State*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *