Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:21:39.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deng Xiaoping: The Statesman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Michael Yahuda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Alone of the world's Communist leaders, Deng Xiaoping has charted a course that has combined for his country rapid economic development, successful economic reform and openness to the capitalistic international economy with continued dictatorship by the Communist Party. Under his leadership Communist rule in China has survived the demise of Communism in Eastern Europe and the disintegration of the Soviet Union-the motherland of Communism. In the process the regime has weathered the ending of the Cold War and has become more engaged with the Asia-Pacific region. But Deng's reputation at home and abroad has been badly tarnished by his ruthlessness in masterminding the Tiananmen massacre of 4 June 1989. But that ruthlessness is absolutely central to Deng's political philosophy and strategy. For him it is the basis of order at home which alone ensures that the economic policies of reform and openness can be carried out without undermining Communist Party rule through the spread of liberal influences. In so far as statesmanship requires moral dimensions it will be necessary in assessing the quality of Deng's statesmanship to consider the meaning of statesmanship itself.

Type
Deng Xiaoping: An Assessment
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 135 , September 1993 , pp. 551 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. On the latter point see Baldwin, David A, Economic Statecraft (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985) pp. 9–12Google Scholar.

2. Wight, Martin, “The theory of the national interest” in Wight, Gabriele and Porter, Brian (eds.), International Theory: The Three Traditions (Leicester & London: Leicester University Press, 1991), p. 126Google Scholar.

3. See his many statements to that effect in his memoirs The White House Years and Years of Upheaval (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, respectively 1979 and 1982). To take one example from the former: “If history teaches anything it is that there can be no peace without equilibrium and no justice without restraint” (p. 55)Google Scholar.

4. Salisbury, Harrison E.The New Emperors: China in the Era of Mao and Deng (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1992), especially pp. 9Google Scholar and 325–26. But see also the book as a whole, based largely upon interviews, for a graphic, if not entirely accurate, portrayal of the extent of the influence of the Chinese imperial past upon the conduct of especially Mao, but also Deng.

5. See Gittings, John, “The statesmanm,” in Wilson, Dick (ed.), Mao Tse-tung in the Scales of History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977), p. 247Google Scholar

6. See Xiaoping's, Deng speech of 9 June 1989 in Beijing Review (henceforth BR), Vol. 32, No. 28 (10–16 07 1989), pp. 14–17Google Scholar.

7. Yu, Jin and Xiankui, Chen, Dangdai Zhongguo da silu – Deng Xiaoping de lilun yu shijian (The Big Themes of Contemporary China – Deng Xiaoping's Theory and Practice) (Beijing: The Chinese People's University Press, 1989), p. 186Google Scholar.

8. Kim, Samuel S., China In and Out of the Changing World Order (Princeton: World Order Studies Program Occasional Paper No. 21, Princeton University, 1991), p. 37Google Scholar.

9. Ross, Robert S., The Indo-China Tangle, China's Vietnam Policy 1975–79 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988), pp.221–22Google Scholar.

10. Xiaoping, Deng, Fundamental Issues in Present-Day China (Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1987), p. 54Google Scholar. For his first mention of the concept see his talk of 12 January 1983, ibid. pp. 10–13.

11. BR, Vol. 29, No. 41 (13 10 1986), p. 7Google Scholar

12. Xiuquan, Wu, Eight Years in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (January 1950–October 1958): Memoirs of a Diplomat (Beijing: New World Press, 1985), pp. 42–43Google Scholardescribes how Zhou initiated the proposal in 1953 as “guiding principles for development of the ministry's work in Asia.” The principles were first made public in the Sino-Indian agreement negotiated by Nehru and Zhou in 1954 and provided the official guide for all China's state relations ever since. They are: (1) mutual respect for each other's territorial integrity and sovereignty; (2) non-aggression; (3) non-interference in each other's internal affairs; (4) equality and mutual benefit; and (5) peaceful co-existence.

13. Kim, , The Changing World Order, pp. 25–27Google Scholar.

14. On Japan see Whiting, Allen S., China Eyes Japan (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989)Google Scholarand Newby, Laura, Sino-Japanese Relations (London: Routledge, 1988)Google Scholar. On the United States, see Oksenberg, Michel, “The China problem,” Foreign Affairs, Summer 1991, p. 12Google Scholar.

15. See Kleinberg, Robert, China's “Opening” to the Outside World: The Experiment with Foreign Capitalism (Boulder: Westview Press, 1990), especially pp. 254–268Google Scholar.

16. See Central Document No. 2 (1992) as carried in Zhengming (Hong Kong, 1 04 1992)Google Scholar in BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, Part 3 (henceforth SWB), FE/1346/B2/2.

17. Xiaoping, Deng, Fundamental Issues, p. 79Google Scholar.

18. See Deng's, speech of 16 January 1980, “The present situation and the tasks before us,” Selected Works (henceforth SW), p. 226Google Scholar: “we really need a peaceful environment, and thus, for the interest of our own country the goal of our foreign policy is a peaceful environment for achieving the four modernizations.”

19. See the brief account in Yahuda, Michael B, China's Role in World Affairs (London: Croom Helm, 1978), pp. 66 and 80–81Google Scholar.

20. Interestingly, Chinese accounts of China's foreign policy have subdivided the period in similar ways.

21. For accounts of Mao's views of international politics at this time see Gittings, “The statesman,” and Yahuda, Michael, Chinese Foreign Policy After Mao, Towards the End of Isolationism (London: Macmillan, 1983) ch. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22. For analysis of Mao's approach see Whiting, Allen S., The Chinese Calculus of Deterrence (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1975)Google Scholar.

23. See for example, King C. Chen, China's War Against Vietnam, 1979: A Military Analysis (Baltimore: University of Maryland, Occasional Papers/Reprint Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, No. 5, 1983); and Jenks, Harlan W., “China's ‘punitive’ war on Vietnam: a military assessment,” Asian Survey, Vol. XIX, No. 8 (08 1979)Google Scholar; and Segal, Gerald, Defending China (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985) ch. 12Google Scholar.

24. See Hamrin, Carol Lee, “China re-assesses the superpowers,” Pacific Affairs (Summer 1983), pp. 209–231Google Scholar.

25. Yahuda, , Foreign Policy After Mao, pp. 205 and 216Google Scholar.

26. For interpretations that give greater weight to problems in Sino-American relations see Pollack, Jonathan D, “The opening to America” in MacFarquhar, Roderick and Fairbank, John K. (eds.), The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 15, Part 2,Google ScholarRevolutions Within the Chinese Revolution 1966–82 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 457–469Google Scholar; and Harding, Harry, A Fragile Relationship: The United States and China Since 1972 (Washington, D. C: The Brookings Institution, 1992) pp. 119–125Google Scholar.

27. For a Chinese account that emphasizes the themes of peace and development as exemplified by the positive linkage between East-West and North-South issues, the prospects for a comparatively long period of peace, the “core” significance of North-South relations and the continuing need to resist hegemonism, see Chuanwang, Tao, Changyun, Zhang and Zhangfu, Luo (eds.), Deng Xiaoping zhuzuo zhuanti yanjiu (Researching the Main Themes of the Writings of Deng Xiaoping) (Beijing: People's Press, 1990), pp. 318–339Google Scholar.

28. Xiaoping, Deng, Fundamental Issues, p. 46Google Scholar.

29. Ibid. p. 95.

30. For example see his speech to an enlarged meeting of the Military Commission, ibid. p. 116.

31. Ibid. p. 98.

32. For analyses of these events see, Chang, Jaw-ling Joanne, “Negotiation of the 17 August 1982 U.S.–PRC arms communiqué: Beijing's negotiating tactics,” The China Quarterly, No. 125 (03 1991) pp. 33–54Google Scholar; Ross, Robert S., “China learns to compromise: Change in U.S.–China relations, 1982–1984,” The China Quarterly, No. 128 (12 1991) pp. 742–773Google Scholar; and Michael B.Yahuda, “The significance of tripolarity in China's policy toward the United States since 1972,” in Robert S. Ross (ed.), The Superpowers and China: The Cold War Triangle (forthcoming). For a somewhat different analysis that stresses Beijing's concern about American arrogance in taking China for granted see Harding, , A Fragile Relationship, pp. 131–37Google Scholar.

33. For a brief account of China's marginalization even before the collapse of the Soviet Union see Yahuda, Michael, “The People's Republic of China at 40: foreign relations,” The China Quarterly, No. 119 (09 1989), pp. 519–539Google Scholar.

34. See for example, BR, Vol. 32, No. 9, 27 February–5 03 1989Google Scholar. See also Harding, , A Fragile Relationship, pp. 178–79Google Scholar. It should be noted that the last piece of evidence cited of American concern at a possible Sino-Soviet accommodation is dated 24 March 1986 (ibid. p. 178).

35. “Deng Xiaoping de Zhonggong suanming” (“Deng Xiaoping sees the future for the CCP”), Zhengming, Hong Kong, No. 151 (1 05 1990)Google Scholar.

36. Chun-yu, Shih, “China, Soviet Union establish new relations of good-neighbourliness, co-operation,” Da Gong Boo, Hong Kong, 16 05 1991Google Scholar, in FBIS-CHI, 16 May 1991, pp. 13–14.

37. Xinhua reported without comment the substance of a 28 February 1991 editorial commentary in Pravda to that effect.

38. Qing Bao (Intelligence), Hong Kong, 5 09 1991, in FBIS-CHI, 9 September 1991, p. 10Google Scholar

39. Po-shih, He, “CCP issues successive emergency circulars ordering entire Party to guard against changes,” Dangdai, Hong Kong, 15 09 1991Google Scholar, in FBIS-CHI, 24 September 1991.

40. For accounts see, Chauda, Nayan, Brother Enemy: A History of Indo-China, the Fall of Saigon (New York: Macmillan Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

41. Kim, , The Changing World Order, pp. 25–27Google Scholar.

42. For the classic account of the former see, Wright, Mary C, The Last Stand of Chinese Conservatism: The Tung Chih Restoration, 1862–1874 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957)Google Scholar.

43. See Goodman, David S. G, “Reforming China: foreign contacts, foreign values?” The Pacific Review, Vol. 5, No. 1 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44. See Chuanwang, Tao et al. , Deng Xiaoping Zhuzuo, p. 290Google Scholar.

45. The famous 19th-century high official who suffers, perhaps unfairly, from the reputation of having sold out his country's sovereignty to buy peace and better relations with foreign imperialists.

46. See for example the erudite discussion in Wight, , “The theory of the national interest,” pp. 111–136Google Scholar.

47. Ionescu, Ghita, Leadership in an Interdependent World: The Statesmanship of Adenauer, De Gaulle, Thatcher and Gorbachev (Harlow, Essex: Longman, 1991) p. 1Google Scholar

48. Wight, , “The theory of the national interest,” p. 121Google Scholar.

49. Wight, and Porter, , International Theory, p. 1Google Scholar

50. Kissinger, Henry, The White House Years (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1979), p. 55Google Scholar.

51. Kissinger, Henry, For the Record, Selected Statements 1977–1980 (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1981), p. 261Google Scholar.

52. Xiaoping, Deng, Fundamental Issues, p. 163Google Scholar.

53. The best accounts of Deng's younger years are to be found in Franz, Uli (trans, by Artin, Tom), Deng Xiaoping (Boston: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1988) especially pp. 21–75Google Scholar; and in Lee, Ching Hua, Deng Xiaoping: The Marxist Road to the Forbidden City (Princeton: The Kingston Press, 1985) pp. 25–35Google Scholar.