Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:14:56.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peasant Mobilization in North China and the Origins of Yenan Communism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Carl E. Dorris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The outbreak of war in North China during the summer of 1937 was the watershed in the growth of the revolutionary movement in China. Seemingly overnight the Communist Party made rapid new gains in strength and territory. From a small, isolated soviet in the desolation of North-west China on the Shensi-Kansu border, the Party enlarged its territories, and by the end of the war communist-backed resistance governments ruled huge portions of North and Central China. In the same period Party membership grew from a little over 20,000 members in 1936 to nearly 1,250,000 members at the Seventh Party Congress in April 1945, and the Red Army, which had dwindled to a mere 30,000 men in the course of the Long March, swelled to over one million men by the war's end. This new political and military framework formed the structural backbone which enabled the Communists to come to power four years later.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 68 , December 1976 , pp. 697 - 719
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mao noted in a preface to a short propaganda tract that Chin-Ch'a-Chi was “a model for other places to follow in implementing the Three Principles and in arousing the masses closely to co-ordinate and to assist in the War of Resistance.” In a speech to recent graduates of Resistance University in 1938 Liu proclaimed that the border region “was the first model for the whole nation, telling the whole nation about methods of founding resistance bases and proving the great possibilities for the creation of such bases at the enemy's rear.”

2. Johnson, Chalmers in Peasant Nationalism and Communist Power (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1962)Google Scholar was the first to focus on the war and forces of nationalism generated in the conflict as prime motive forces in providing the Chinese Communists with a mass base sufficient to win the Chinese revolution. For counter-views stressing class appeals, see Gillin, Donald, “‘Peasant nationalism ’ in the history of Chinese Communism,” Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. XXIII, No. 2, pp. 269–89;Google ScholarSelden, Mark, The Yenan Way in Revolutionary China (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971);Google Scholar and Seybolt, Peter, “Yenan education and the Chinese Revolution” (Harvard Ph.D. dissertation, 1969).Google Scholar Tetsuya Kataoka's study, Resistance and Revolution in China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974), is an interesting twist on Johnson's thesis. Kataoka agrees that the war was crucial to the communist victory, but he sees the communist victory not as a product of nationalism and political modernization but instead a return or restoration of customary values through the reliance on traditional self-defence methods of the min-t'uan variety.Google Scholar

3. Selden, The Yenan Way, pp. 175–200.

4. Tse-tung, Mao, Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung (SW) (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1967), Vol. I, p. 313.Google Scholar

5. Ibid. Vol. I, pp. 295–308.

6. Shui, Hung, ‘Women ti ch'ün-chung kung-tso” (“Our mass work”), Chieh-fang (Liberation), No. 25 (27 November 1937), pp. 16–20.Google Scholar

7. Shao-ch'i, Liu, “Hua-pei chan-ch'u kung-tso ti ching-yen” (“The work experiences of the North China battle zone ”), in Ming-jen chiang-yen-chi (A Collection of Speeches of Famous Personalities) (Yenan, 1939), pp. 85–108.Google Scholar

8. See Wang Ming, Chou En-lai and Po Ku, in “Wo-men tui-yü pao-wei Wu-han yü san-ch'i k'ang-chan went-t'i ti i-chien” (“Our opinion concerning the problems of defending Wuhan and the third stage of the resistance war”), Hsin-hua jih-pao (New China Daily), 15 June 1938.

9. Ch'en Yün, “K'ai-chan ch'ün-chung kung-tso shih mu-ch'ien ti-fang kung-tso ti chung-hsin” (“The development of mass work is the present centre of local work”), Kung-ch'an-tang jen (The Communist), No. 2 (November 1939).

10. Ibid.

11. Chen, P'eng, “Lun Chin-Ch'a-Chi pien-ch'u t'u-ti cheng-ts'e” (“On the Chin-Ch'a-Chi border region land policy”), in T'u-ti cheng-ts'e chung-yao wen-chien hui-chi (Kalgan, 1946), pp. 43–49.Google Scholar

12. Statistics on tenancy rates, cash crop rents, and cash rents are available on several counties in the Peiyueh District and Central Hopeh in Buck, John L., Land Utilization in China (Shanghai: Commercial Press, 1937)Google Scholar. See Ho-fa, Feng, Chung-kuo nung-ts'un ching-chi ts'e-liao (Materials on Chinese Village Economy) (Shanghai, 1935), for pre-war information on Fu-p'ing.Google Scholar

13. Kuichi, Tanaka, Jihenka no hokushi nōson-Kahokuhō Teikannai ichi nōson jittai chōsa hokoko (A North China Village After the Incident-An Investigation Report on the Situation of One Village in Hopeh's Ting-hsien (Tientsin, 1942), pp. 7–12.Google Scholar For information on Sha-ching village see Myers, Ramon, The Chinese Peasant Economy: Agricultural Development in Hopei and Shantung, 1890–1949 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970), p. 44.Google Scholar Myers based his data on Sha-ching village on Japanese surveys conducted during the war in several North China villages. See Noburu, Niida (ed.), Chūugoku nōson kankō chōsa (Field Investigations of Chinese Villages) (Tokyo, 1952, 1954).Google Scholar

14. For a discussion of techniques of mass mobilization following this strategy see Chi-Lu-Yü fourth district (Huai-yang) committee, Tsen-yang fa-tung ch'ün-chung (How to Mobilize the Masses) np., 1940).

15. P'eng Chen, Chin-Ch'a-Chi cheng-ts'e (Policies of Chin-Ch'a-Chi), (Fu-p'ing, 1942), pp. 32–40.

16. Liu Shao-ch'i, “Kuan-yü ch'ün-chung kung-tso ti chi-ko wen-t'i” (“Several problems concerning mass work”) in Chan-hsien-she (Battleline press) (ed.), Ch'ün-chung kung-tso chih-nan (Guide to Mass Work) (np., 1945), pp. 15–17.

17. “Chin-Ch'a-Chi pien-ch'u mu-ch'ien shih-cheng kang-ling” (“The present political programme of the Chin-Ch'a-Chi border region ”), in K'ang-Jih ken-chü-ti cheng-ts'e t'iao-li hui-chi: Chin-Ch'a-Chi chih-pu A Collection of Statutes and Policies of Anti-Japanese Base Areas: Chin-Ch'a-Chi Section) (Yenan. 1942), pp. 1–5.Google Scholar

18. Hsiang Sheng, “Chin-Ch'a-Chi pien-ch'u ts'ai-cheng chien-she-chung ti ch'uang-chu” (“The new and unique undertaking in financial construction of the Chin-Ch'a-Chi border region”), Chieh-fang jih-pao (Liberation Daily), 7 September 1941.

19. Te-huai, P'eng, “Kuan-yü Hua-pei ken-chü-ti kung-tso ti pao-kao” (“A report on North China base area work”), Chen-li (Truth), No. 14 (20 August 1943), pp. 31–32.Google Scholar

20. Huang Wei-wen, “Kuan-yü ken-chü-ti chien-tsu chien-hsi i-hsieh ts'ai-liao” (“Some materials concerning base area rent and interest reductions”) Chieh-fang jih-pao (Liberation Daily), 11 February 1942.

21. Chi-Lu-Yü fourth district committee, Tsen-yang fa-tung ch'ün-chung.

22. Throughout most of 1939 and 1940 Wang Ming consistently appears in the pages of the Hsin Chung-hua pao (New China News), a Yenan periodical, as one of the principal, if not the major, speakers at Party and public functions in Yenan city. At least two of his major works appeared in press in 1940. In July Chieh-fang-she (Liberation Press) republished his essay“ Wei Chung-kung keng-chia pu-erh-sai-wei-k'o-hua erh tou-cheng” (“Struggle in order to bolshevize more thoroughly the Chinese Communist Party”) and in November The Commonist included a long article of Wang's entitled, “Lun Ma-Lieh chu-i chueh-ting ts'e-lueh ti chi-pen yuan-tse” (“On several basic principles of Marxist-Leninist decisive strategy ”).

23. P'eng Chen, Chin-Ch'a-Chi cheng-ts'e.

24. Pi-shih, Jen, “Kuan-yü chi-ko wen-t'i ti i-chien” (“An opinion concerning several questions”), Fu-hsiao (Dawn), Vol. 1, No. 1 (April 1943), pp. 40–45.Google Scholar

25. Liu Shao-ch'i, “Kuan-yü ch'ün-chung kung-tso ti chi-ko went-t'i.” Liu gave this report at the Chin-Sui Senior Cadre Conference, 9–10 December 1942. The report appears to be essentially the same in content as reports given before the North China Bureau, November 1942, and the North-west Bureau, January 1943, Senior Cadre Conferences.

26. Liu Shao-ch'i, “Yen-ch'eng nung-chiu kung-tso ching-yen” (“The work experiences of the Yen-ch'eng peasant association”), in Ch'ün-chung kung-tso chih-nan, pp. 41–46.

27. Ying-shen, Hua (ed.), Chung-kuo kung-ch'an-tang lieh-shih-chuan (Martyrs of the Chinese Communist Party), (Hong Kong, 1949), pp. 153–56.Google Scholar

28. “Hsiu-cheng Chin-Ch'a-Chi pien-ch'u chien-tsu chien-hsi tan-hsing t'iao-li” (“The revised rent and interest reductions statute of the Chin-Ch'a-Chi border region”), in K'ang-Jih ken-chü-ti cheng-ts'e t'iao-li hui-chi: Chin-Ch'a-Chi chih-pu, pp. 412–17.

29. T'u-ti cheng-ts'e chung-yao wen-chien hui-chi, pp. 39–40.

30. Ho-shou, Wang, “Mu-ch'ien kan-pu cheng-ts'e-chung chi-ko wen-t'i” (“Several problems in present cadre policy”), Kung-ch'an-tang jen, No. 3 (December 1939), pp. 23–31. According to Wang only older districts in Shen-Kan-Ning had a high ratio of experienced cadres from soviet days, reaching perhaps 30% of the work force.Google Scholar

31. Ch'ün-chung kung-tso shih-ling” (“Mass work miscellany”), Tang-ti sheng-huo (Party life), No. 4 (January 1940), pp. 30–32.Google Scholar

32. Mao Tse-tung, SW, Vol. II, pp. 208–10.

33. Shang-k'un, Yang. “Hua-pei tang-chien-she-chung ti chi-ko wen-t'i” (“Several problems in North China party construction”), in Chung-kuo ko-ming yü Chung-kuo kung-ch'an-tang - kan-pu pi-tu chung-yao wen-hsien (The Chinese Revolution and the Chinese Communist Party - Important Documents which Cadres Must Read), (Yenan. 1940). pp. 335–38.Google Scholar

34. Liu Shao-ch'i, “Lun tsu-chih ch'ün-chung ti chi-ko chi-pen yuan-tse” (“On several basic principles of organizing the masses”), in Chun-kuo ko-ming yü Chung-kuo kung-ch'an-tang, pp. 377–78.

35. “Liu Shao-ch'i t'ung-chih pao-kao ”(“Report of Comrade Liu Shao-ch'i”).in Ch'ün-ehung kung-tso chih-nan, pp. 29–35.

36. “Chin-Ch'a-Chi pien-ch'u jcn-min wu-chuang k'ang-Jih tzu-wei-tui tzu-chih chang-ch'eng” (“The organizational form of the Chin-Ch'a-Chi border region people's armed anti-Japanese self-defence forces”), in K'ang-Jih ken-chü-ti cheng-ts'e t'iao-li hui-chi: Chin-Ch'a-Chi chih-pu, pp. 99–105.

37. Su, Chang, “Ho-tso-she-fa ti hsiu-cheng ching-k'uang chi cheng-chuang kung-tso tsung-chieh” (“A summary of the revisions of co-operative principles and the rectification of co-operative units”), in Hsien-hsing fa-ling hui-chi (A Collection of Current Statutes and Ordinances) (Kalgan, 1945), pp. 656–62.Google Scholar

38. cheng-fu, Chin-Ch'a-Chi pien-ch'u (Chin-Ch'a-Chi border region government). Chin-Ch'a-Chi pien-ch'u ti lao-tung hu-chu (Labour Exchanges of the Chin-Ch'a-Chi Border Region) (Kalgan, 1946). pp. 19–23. See also Chao Hung, “I-chiu-ssu-san-nien sheng-ch'an-chung Fu-p'ing tzu-chih po-kung ti ching-yen” (“The experience of organizing labour exchange of Fu-p'ing in 1943 production”), Chin-Ch'a-Chi jih-pao. (Chin-Ch'a-Chi Daily), 18 March 1944.Google Scholar

39. Ibid. pp. 3–11.

40. Ibid. pp. 32–51.

41. Ibid. pp. 26–31.

42. Ibid. pp. 60–63.

43. Ching-t'ang, Shih et al. (eds.), Chung-kuo nung-yeh ho-tso-hua yun-tung shih-liao (Historical Materials of China's Agricultural Co-operativization Movement) (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1957), Vol. I, pp. 428–29.Google Scholar

44. Chao P'eng-fei, “Eung-hua lao-tung ying-hsiung Ko Ts'un ts'ung p'in-k'un-chung fan-lo shen”(“Lung-hua's labour hero, Ko Ts'un, from poverty turned over ”), Chin-Ch'a-Chi jih-pao, 14 January 1945.

45. Jo-yü, Lai, “T'ai-hang-ch'u sheng-ch'an yun-tung ti ch'u-pu tsung-chieh” (“A preliminary summary of Taihang District's production drive”), in Shih Ching-t'ang et aL, Chung-kuo nung-yeh, Vol. I, pp. 464–67.Google Scholar