Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:23:11.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Early New England Missionaries on Women's Roles in Zulu Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Amanda Porterfield
Amanda Porterfield
Affiliation:
professor of religious studies and director of women's studies at Indiana University—Purdue University ar Indianapolis, Indiana.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As missionaries from New England made initial forays into Zululand and Natal in the 1830s, the Zulu people were in a state of considerable stress. Dingan had come to power in 1828 after participating in the assassination of his brother Shaka, the notorious warrior king whose conquests after 1816 brought people from dozens of clans and chieftanships into a Zulu state. Ecological crises caused by drought and competition for scarce resources contributed to Shaka's ability to exert unprecedented authority, as did the predatory incursions of European traders seeking ivory, skins, and slaves in various parts of southeast Africa. Expanding on a tradition of religious initiation and military ranking known as ambutho, Shaka crated a system of loyalty to the state that built on but also compromised the loyalties to particular clans commanded by lesser chiefs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 67 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Eldredge, Elizabeth A., “Sources of Conflict in Southern Africa, c. 1800–30: The ‘Mfecane’ Reconsidered,” Journal of African History 33 (1992): 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; James, Gump, “Origins of the Zulu Kingdom.” The Historian 50 (08 1988): 521–534Google Scholar; Julian, Cobbing, “The Mfecane as Alibi: Thoughts on Dithakong and Mbolompo,” Journal of African History 29 (1988): 487–519Google Scholar; and Guy, Jeff, “Ecological Factors in the Rise of Shaka and the Zulu Kingdom,” in Economy and Society in Pre-Industrial South Africa, ed. Shula, Marks and Anthony, Atmore (London, 1980), pp. 265–289.Google Scholar

2. Letters from Aldin, Grout, October and November 1841, Missionary Herald 38 (1842): 337–340Google Scholar; and Grout, Lewis, Zulu-land; or Life among the Zulu-Kafirs of Natal and Zulu-land, South Africa (Philadelphia, Pa., 1864), pp. 210–211.Google Scholar

3. Aldin, Grout to Rufus Anderson, 7 November 1841, Missionary Herald 38 (1842): 339–340.Google Scholar

4. “Mrs. Grout's Journal,” Letters and Papers of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM), Houghton Library, Harvard University. The king and his wives may have understood Charlotte's ability to communicate with her students in writing as a magical ritual involving a principle of spiritual causation, much as later, in apartheid South Africa, healers sometimes rubbed their patients with newspapers or other printed pages, believing that the writing on them had inherent power. Mpande may also have been suspicious of the objectifying process involved in writing and reading, which defined reality as missionaries saw it and gave it a persisting reality impervious to Zulu control. See Jean, and Comaroff, John, Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa (Chicago, 1991)Google Scholar. Also see Comaroff, Jean, Body of Power, Spirit of Resistance: The Culture and History of a South African People (Chicago, 1985).Google Scholar

5. Letter from MrGrout, , Umlazi, , 16 09 1842, Missionary Herald 39 (1843): 77–78Google Scholar; and Grout, L., Zulu-land, p. 211.Google Scholar

6. Newell Adams to Rufus Anderson, 30 May 1843, Letters and Papers of the ABCFM, quoted in Etherington, Norman, Preachers Peasants and Politics in Southeast Africa, 1835–1880: African Christian Communities in Natal, Pondoland and Zululand (London, 1978), p. 75.Google Scholar

7. British troops took possession of Natal in 1842, and the following year, the British government issued a proclamation stating that the Voortrekkers would be allowed to continue to live in Natal only under the agreement that slavery and other legal distinctions based on color or place of origin were prohibited. This censure of the Voortrekkers and concern for the welfare of Africans impressed the Americans, who welcomed British government in Natal as a humane and stabilizing context for their own work. But the British takeover of Natal opened the door to a surge in British immigration, and to the creation of a system of economic exploitation, dependence on British trade and industry, and legal discrimination that cast aside earlier commitments to racial equality. See Grout, L., Zulu-land, pp. 90–93Google Scholar; and Ballard, Charles, “Traders, Trekkers and Colonists,” Natal and Zululand from Earliest Times to 1910: A New History, ed. Andrew, Duminy and Bill, Guest (Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 1989), pp. 116–145.Google Scholar

8. Taylor, James Dexter, The American Board Mission in South Africa: A Sketch of Seventy-Five Years (Durban, South Africa, 1911), p. 9.Google Scholar

9. Lindley, Daniel, Grout, Aldin, and Adams, Newell to Rufus Anderson, 22 08 1837, Letters and Papers of the ABCFM; and Etherington, Preachers, Peasants and Politics, pp. 47–48Google Scholar. While the Americans defined their work primarily in terms of the Zulu, many of the residents and visitors at missions stations were, from the beginning, members of a variety of groups. The Zulus themselves were an ethnically complex nation including Ndelus, Ngcobos, Mdlulis, Mthembus, Mtheiyanes, and other lineages. Refugees from or members of the Qadi, Nyuswa, and other groups never incorporated in the Zulu state also lived in Natal and became involved in missionary activities. For a partial list of families in Natal and Zululand, see Vilakazi, Absolom, Zulu Transformations: A Study of the Dynamics of Social Change (Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 1965), p. 139Google Scholar. Among the families Vilakazi discussed in 1965, the Qadi and Nyuswa were comprised primarily of traditionalists, although both included a contingent of Christians. The other families listed above were prominent Christians.

10. Lewis Grout, A Report of the Umsunduzi Mission Station for the year ending September 1852, Letters and Papers of the ABCFM.

11. Ibid.

12. Lugg, H. C., “The Practice of Lobolo in Natal,” African Studies 4 (03 1945): 23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Jeffreys, M. D. W., “Lobolo is Child-Price,” African Studies 10 (12 1951): 145–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. Etherington, , Preachers Peasants and Politicians, pp. 61–62.Google Scholar

14. Ibid., pp. 96, 103–104; quotation from p. 81.

15. Aldin, Grout to Rufus Anderson, 7 November 1841, Missionary Herald 38 (1842): 339–340Google Scholar.

16. Berglund, Axel-Ivar, Zulu Thought-Patterns and Symbolism (1976; repr. Bloomington, Ind., 1989), p. 85Google Scholar. According to Berglund's informant, while heavy breathing was the man's own, when “he breathes slower after the work” that is a sign that “the shades have left him.”

17. Etherington, , Preachers Peasants and Politicians, pp. 96–99.Google Scholar

18. Callaway, Henry, Nursery Tales, Traditions, and Histories of the Zulus, in their own words, with a translation into English and Notes (London, 1868), 1:47–54Google Scholar; quotations from pp. 47, 54.

19. Berglund, , Zulu Thought-Patterns, p. 188Google Scholar. Berglund found sixty-eight diviners in the 1970s, sixty-one of whom were women. In 1917, an earlier ethnographer found that ninety percent of diviners were women; see Bryant, A. T., “The Zulu Cult of the Dead,” Man 17 (1917): 140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20. Berglund, , Zulu Thought-Patterns, pp. 120–122, 139, 270–272, 307–308Google Scholar. Because the defining element of witchcraft was anger, all women had reason to suppress that emotion, even if their husbands and in-laws treated them badly. The loyalty of married women diviners in nineteenth-century Zulu society was especially questionable; the shades of a woman's own ancestors worked within her, and not the shades of her husband's lineage, who were fed and cared for in her husband's kraal, where she lived. His ancestral shades protected him and other living members of the lineage, and it is easy to imagine how they might have resented the intrusion of countervailing authorities. In the twentieth century, women diviners came to be called by their husband's shades as well as the shades of their own ancestors. This new flexibility may have been a response to the extended absences from home that the South African labor system imposed on African men, and the need for women to step in and preserve the religious life of the home by maintaining communication with the husband's shades.

21. Lewis Grout to Rufus Anderson, Umvoti, 18 May 1847, Letters and Papers of the ABCFM; Etherington, , Preachers Peasants, and Politicians, pp. 96–97Google Scholar; and Berglund, , Zulu Thought-Patterns, p. 136–138.Google Scholar

22. Comaroff, and Comaroff, , Of Revelation and Revolution, p. 240.Google Scholar

23. Lewis Grout to Rufus Anderson, Umvoti, 16 April 1847, and Lewis Grout to Rufus Anderson, Umsunduzi, 21 November 1848, Letters and Papers of the ABCFM.

24. See Lewis Grout, Umsunduzi Mission Station Annual Report, September 1848, Letters and Papers of the ABCFM.

25. Lewis Grout to Rufus Anderson, Umvoti, 16 April 1847, Letters and Papers of the ABCFM.

26. Quoted in Gaitskell, Deborah, “‘Wailing for Purity’: Prayer Unions, African Mothers and Adolescent Daughters 1912–1940,” in Industrialization and Social Change in South Africa: Africa Class Formation, Culture and Consciousness 1879–1930, ed. Shula, Marks and Richard, Rathbone (London, 1982), p. 339.Google Scholar

27. Vilakazi, , Zulu Transformations, pp. 138–139.Google Scholar

28. Ibid., pp. 102, 139; quotation from p. 102.

29. Gaitskell, , “‘Wailing for Purity,’” pp. 338–357.Google Scholar

30. Marks, Shula, “Natal, the Zulu Royal Family and the Ideology of Segregation,” Journal of Southern African Studies 4 (04 1978): 172–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Etherington, Norman, “The ‘Shepstone System’ in the Colony of Natal and Beyond the Borders,” in Natal and Zululand, ed. Duminy, and Guest, , pp. 170–192Google Scholar; and Etherington, , Preachers Peasants and Politicians, pp. 6–23.Google Scholar

31. Guy, Jeff, “The Destruction and Reconstruction of Zulu Society,” and Tim Couzens, “‘Moralizing Leisure Time’: The Transatlantic Connection and Black Johannesburg 1918–1936,” both in Industrialization and Social Change, pp. 167–194Google Scholar; and Marks, Shula, “Natal, the Zulu Royal Family and the Ideology of Segregation,” pp. 172–194.Google Scholar

32. Shula, Marks, ed., Not Either an Experimental Doll, pp. 23, 31–37Google Scholar; quotation from p. 31.

33. Etherington, , Peasants and Politicians, pp. 152–156Google Scholar; and Sundkler, Bengt G. M., Bantu Prophets in South Africa (1948; repr. London, 1961), pp. 297, 301.Google Scholar