Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T10:23:17.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homer, Odyssey 1.132–3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Howard Jacobson
Howard Jacobson
Affiliation:
University of Illionis, Urbana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , May 2000 , pp. 290
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 West, S. (ed.), A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey 1 (Oxford, 1988), 93Google Scholarad 1.132–3.

2 A case could also be made at Od. 1.128,2.412,9.367,15.449.

3 Eustathius ad loc. writes λ⋯γε↓. This may suggest he read μεηστήρωε with òρυμαγδ. The fact that the scholion ad loc. gives the lemma as κτoθεε ἄλλωε (not κτoθεε ἄλλωε μεηστήρωε) may be significant (cf. e.g. the scholia at Od. 1.60 and 312, where the lemma overlaps the next line).

4 For the placement of μή, cf. e.g. il. 5.24, 6.57,9.522,15.196, Od. 16.133, 18.20, 62, 24.174. A separation as great as μεηστήρω… òρυμαγδ is not common in Homer, but extreme examples can also be seen at Il. 11.242–3,12.177–8,23.339–40 and Od. 21.372–3.

5 I am indebted to Prof. David Sansone for a beneficial reading of an earlier version of this note.