Skip to main content
×
×
Home

L. Varius Rufus, De Morte (Frs. 1–4 Morel)

  • A. S. Hollis (a1)
Extract

Already an admired senior poet to Virgil in the Eclogues (9.35), Varius by the mid-thirties, B.C. had established himself as the leading epic writer of his day (Horace, Sat. 1.10.43–4). It is a sobering thought that we do not know even the titles of the serious hexameter works which had won him so high a reputation, except for de Morte, quoted four times by Macrobius (from whom we may gather that the poem was not split into more than one book).

Copyright
References
Hide All

1 See Bardon, , La Littérature latine inconnue, vol. ii, pp. 2830.

1 Rivista di filologia N.S. 37 (1959), 380–94.

3 The texts, with a summary of the voluminous scholarship on them, are conveniently reproduced by Gigante, M., Cronache ercolanesi 3 (1973), 86–7. Varius' name is certain in both fragments.

4 Bassi, D., Herculanensium Voluminum Quae Supersunt, Collectio Tertia, vol. i (Milan, 1914), 19 ff.Gigante, , Ricerche filodemee (1969), pp. 63122, discusses and annotates the most interesting portions.

5 e.g. Odes ii. 14.23 on the cypress (Gigante, , Ricerche filodemee, p. 111)–one can cite several other points of contact.

6 Philodemus over den Dood (Amsterdam, 1925), p. 96.

7 JRS 31 (1941), 154.

8 Momigliano, , op. cit. 153–4.

9 A point which Rostagni, (op. cit. 383) appears to overlook.

10 Morel, , FPL, p. 103 (from Martial 11. 20).

11 Morel would join them (supported by Wigodsky, M.Virgil and Early Latin Poetry, p. 103 n.507).

12 I would not argue that the de Morte must be later than March 43 (the date of the Twelfth Philippic); the catch phrase including ‘figere’ and ‘refigere’ could have been current during the previous year (cf. ‘fixit legem’ in ad Att. 14.12.1, which I quote later).

13 The basic discussion of Antony's agrarian legislation was by Sternkopf, W. in Hermes 47 (1912), 146–51.

14 Cf. Bailey on Lucr. 3.31–93 (vol. ii, p. 996) for the same idea in other Epicurean texts.

15 Bailey's text with commentary gives the same pattern in Lucretius 3.83. But it seems much more likely that ‘hunc’ in 3.83 picks up ‘hunc … timorem’ in 82, and that ’ (84) is corrupt.

16 Discussed by Momigliano, , op. cit. 154.

17 Professor Long points out that the taming of animals was a subject which interested Epicureans (cf. Huby, P., ‘The Epicureans, Animals and Free-will’, Apeiron 3 (1969), 1719).

18 A refusal to be diverted is also the essence in Silius' imitation of Varius fr. 4 (Punica 10.79–82).

19 The echo of Lucretius 3.37 ‘et metus ille foras praeceps Acheruntis agendus’ is obvious.

20 For comments and information I am indebted to Mr. E.W. Gray, Professor R.G.M. Nisbet, and Mr. David Sedley.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Classical Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0009-8388
  • EISSN: 1471-6844
  • URL: /core/journals/classical-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 244 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.