Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Maniliana

  • D. R. Shackleton Bailey (a1)
Extract

Critics, once so busy with Manilius, have left him alone since Housman's edition was completed a quarter of a century ago. Perhaps I shall seem rash to break the silence by challenging a few of his verdicts. I do so in no spirit of iconoclasm, but rather believing that Housman wrote for readers who will occasionally call him wrong—at their peril, and on their knees.

Copyright
References
Hide All

page 81 note 1 Effort has revived of late: G. P. Goold writes on the MSS. in Rhein. Mus. (1954), pp. 359–72 and Waszink, J. H. has some observations on Book I in Ut Pictura Poesis (Leiden, 1955), pp. 204–14.

page 83 note 1 Lucretius has atque quietem (3. 910) and Sidonius, in hendecasyllabics, atque quartus (23. 380). There are two dubious instances in Plautus, Merc. 742, Pseud. 727. In prose the phenomenon is rare but not, as Lewis and Short assert, unknown; cf. Cic. Verr. 2. 5. 157 a. querimoniam, Leg. Agr. 2. 90 a. qui, De Dom. 144 a. quaeso, De Diu. 1. 92 a. quaestum, Val. Max. 4. 8. 3. a. quinquagies, Vitr. 6. 6. 1 a. quot, Plin. N.H. 22. 94 a. qui, Cels. 2. 10. 19 a. quod, Solin. 30. 8 a. quadripedes.

page 84 note 1 I take this from Housman's addenda, ad loc.

page 85 note 1 See Propertiana (Cambridge, 1956), p. 211.

page 86 note 1 For a challenge to rabidique Leonis in 2. 211 and 5. 550 see Propertiana, p. 317.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Classical Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0009-8388
  • EISSN: 1471-6844
  • URL: /core/journals/classical-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 63 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.