Skip to main content

Horace, Odes, Book I - Nisbet R. G. M. and Hubbard Margaret: A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book I. Pp. lviii+440. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970. Cloth, £4·20.

  • M. L. Clarke (a1)
Hide All

1 Soubiran (p. 588) says 1·6 per cent, but his arithmetic is slightly faulty. His figure of 3 per cent for Calpurnius (p. 561) is taken from Sturtevant and Kent and is certainly too high.

2 See, for instance, apropos of ‘homodyne’ and ‘heterodyne’, Greenberg N. A., ‘Vergil and the computer: fourth foot texture in Aeneid I,’ Org. int. pour l'étude des langues anciennes par ordinateur, Revue 1967, no. 1, 116, confirming the scepticism expressed on non-statistical grounds by Wilkinson L. P., Golden Latin Artistry (1963), p. 128.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Classical Review
  • ISSN: 0009-840X
  • EISSN: 1464-3561
  • URL: /core/journals/classical-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 140 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.