Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Why is terrorism a man’s business?

  • Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler (a1)

Abstract

Terrorism, whether it is group-related or performed as lone actor terrorism, is a predominantly male phenomenon. Generally and throughout history, young males have been the main protagonists of criminal and political violence.

This article aims to contribute, from different perspecives, to the question of what makes young men violent. These include neurobiological aspects, such as sex differences in the brain that predispose males to physical aggression and violence; gender role aspects, with regard to aggression and violence being basic components for demonstrating and reconstructing masculinity; demographic aspects of male youth bulges as potential breeding grounds for terrorism; aspects of group dynamics and identity fusion in the process of radicalization; and psychosocial characteristics of lone actor terrorists, which differ from group-related terrorists.

It is concluded that in addition to ideological, political, economic, regional, demographic, or psychosocial causes, experiences of threatened masculinity may be an underlying factor and driving force for terrorism.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Address for correspondence: Prof. Dr.rer.soc Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Nussbaumstr. 7, D-80336 Munich, Germany. (Email: anne-maria.moeller-leimkuehler@med.uni-muenchen.de)

References

Hide All
1. Schmidt, AP. The revised academic consensus definition of terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism. 2012; 6(2): 158159.
2. Post, JM. Terrorism and right-wing extremism: the changing face of terrorism and political violence in the 21st century: the virtual community of hatred. Int J Group Psychother. 2015; 65(2): 243271.
4. White, JR. Terrorism and Homeland Security, 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2012.
5. Bergen, P, Cruickshank, P. The Iraq effect: war has increased terrorism sevenfold worldwide. Mother Jones. 2007: 17. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2007/03/iraq-effect-war-iraq-and-its-impact-war-terrorism-pg-2.
6. Pew Research Center. Unfavorable views of Jews and Muslims on the increase in Europe. http://www.pewglobal.org/2008/09/17/unfavorable-views-of-jews-and-muslims-on-the-increase-in-europe/. September 17, 2008.
7. Bremmer, I. These 5 facts explain why Europe is ground zero for terrorism. Time. http://time.com/4268579/brussels-attacks-islamist-terrorism-isis/. March 22, 2016.
8. Renard, T. Fear not: a critical perspective on the terrorist threat in Europe. Security Policy Brief No. 77; 2016. Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations, Brussels.
9. Niehoff, D. Not hardwired: the complex neurobiology of sex differences in violence. Violence and Gender. 2014; 1(1): 1924.
10. Staniloiu, A, Markowitsch, H. Gender differences in violence and aggression—a neurobiological perspective. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 33: 10321036.
11. Caspi, A, McClay, J, Miffitt, TE, et al. Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science. 2002; 297(5582): 851854.
12. Bogerts, B, Möller-Leimkühler, AM. Neurobiologische Ursachen und psychosoziale Bedingungen individueller Gewalt. Nervenarzt. 2013; 84(11): 13291344.
13. Montoya, ER, Terburg, D, Bos, PA, van Honk, J. Testosterone, cortisol, and serotonin as key regulators of social aggression: a review and theoretical perspective. Motiv Emot. 2012; 36(1): 6573.
14. Walderhaug, E, Magnusson, A, Neumeister, A, et al. Interactive effects of sex and 5-HTTLPR on mood and impulsivity during tryptophan depletion in healthy people. Biol Psychiatry. 2007; 62(6): 593599.
15. Lighthall, NR, Mather, M, Gorlick, MA. Acute stress increases sex differences in risk seeking in the balloon analogue risk task. PLoS One. 2009; 4(7): e6002.
16. Taylor, SE, Klein, LC, Lewis, BP, Gruenewald, TL, Gurung, RA, Updegraff, JA. Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychol Rev. 107(3): 411429.
17. Stanton, SJ, Wirth, MM, Waugh, CE, Schultheiss, OC. Endogenous testosterone levels are associated with amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex responses to anger faces in men but not women. Biol Psychiatry. 2009; 81(2): 118122.
18. Steinberg, L. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev Rev. 2008; 28(1): 78106.
19. Eaton, DK, Kann, L, Kinchen, S, et al. Youth risk behaviour surveillance – United States, 2011. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012; 61(4): 1162.
20. Telzer, EH. Dopaminergic reward sensitivity can promote adolescent health: a new perspective on the mechanism of ventral striatum activation. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016; 17: 5767.
21. Goudie, C, Markoff, B. How ISIS recruiting videos mirror Hollywood scripts. http://abc7chicago.com/news/how-isis-recruiting-videos-mirror-hollywood-scripts/1194173/. February 9, 2016.
22. Riegler, T. Through the lenses of Hollywood: depictions of terrorism in American movies. Perspectives on Terrorism. 2010; 4(2): 3545.
23. Hall, A. ISIS has launched a new recruitment drive among unaccompanied youngsters in Germany’s refugee camps. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3799915/ISIS-launched-new-recruitment-drive-unaccompanied-youngsters-Germany-s-refugee-camps-officials-warn-group-plots-Paris-style-carnage. September 21, 2016.
24. Connell, RW, Messerschmidt, JW. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender and Society. 2005; 19(6): 829859.
25. Holt, DB, Thompson, CJ. Man-of-action heroes: the pursuit of heroic masculinity in everyday consumption. Journal of Consumer Research. 2004; 31(2): 425440.
26. Ferber, AL, Kimmel, MS. The gendered face of terrorism. Sociology Compass. 2008; 2(3): 870887.
27. Bosson, JK, Vandello, JA. Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011; 20(2): 8286.
28. The Swedish Agency for Youth and Civil Society. Young and extreme—a youth and gender perspective on violent extremism. https://www.mucf.se/sites/default/files/publikationer_uploads/young-and-extreme.pdf. 2016.
29. Werner, F. Soldatische Männlichkeit im Vernichtungskrieg. Geschlechtsspezifische Dimensionen der Gewalt in Feldpostbriefen 1941–1944. In Didczuneit V, Ebert J, Jander T, eds. Schreiben im Krieg – Schreiben vom Krieg. Feldpost im Zeitalter der Weltkriege. Essen, Germany: Klartext; 2011: 283294.
30. Neizel, S, Welzer, H. Soldaten: On Fighting, Killing and Dying: The Secret Second World War Tapes of German POWs. New York: Simon & Schuster/Paula Wiseman Books; 2012.
31. Morgan, DHJ. Theater of war: combat, the military, and masculinities. In: Brod H, Kaufman M, eds. Theorizing Masculinities. London: Sage; 1994: 165.
32. Eichler, M. Militarized masculinities in international relations. Brown Journal of World Affairs. 2014; 21(1): 8193.
33. McCue, C, Haahr, K. The impact of youth bulges on Islamist radicalization and violence. https://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/the-impact-of-global-youth-bulges-on-islamist-radicalization-and-violence. 2008.
34. Cohen, D, Nusbett, RE, Bowdle, BF, Schwarz, N. Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: an “experimental ethnography. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996; 70(5): 945959.
35. Richards, B. What drove Anders Breivik. Contexts. 2014; 13(4): 4247.
36. Junge, Männer. Die gefährlichste Spezies der Welt. http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-55294591.html. Der Spiegel. 2008;2.
37. Loeber, R, Hoeve, M, Slot, NW, van der Laan, PH. Persisters and desisters in crime from adolescence into adulthood. London: Routledge; 2012.
38. Newman, E. Exploring the “root causes” of terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. 2006; 29(8): 749772.
39. Kivimäki, T, Montesanti, E. Global terrorism: causes, consequences and solutions. Global Research. http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-terrorism-causes-consequences-and-solutions/5529247. 2016.
40. Urdal, H. A clash of generations? Youth bulges and political violence. International Studies Quarterly. 2006; 50(3): 607629.
41. Aslam, M. Gender-Based Explosions: The Nexus Between Muslim Masculinities, Jihadist Islamism and Terrorism. Tokyo: United Nations University Press; 2012.
42. Gambetta, D, Hertog, S. Engineers of Jihad: The Curious Connection Between Violent Extremism and Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2016.
43. Kivimäki, T. Executive summary. In Kivimäki T, ed. Development Cooperation as an Instrument in the Prevention of Terrorism. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs/Nordic Institute of Asia Studies; 2003.
44. Kroehnert, S, Klingholz, R. Not am Mann. Von Helden der Arbeit zur neuen Unterschicht? Berlin Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung. http://www.berlin-institut.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Studien/Not_am_Mann_Webversion.pdf. 2007.
45. Kroehnert, S, Vollmer, S. Where have all young women gone? Gender-specific migration from East to West Germany. World Development Report. Background Paper. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2009/Resources/4231006-1204741572978/Vollmer.pdf. 2008.
46. Koehler, D. Right-wing extremism and terrorism in Europe. PRISM.. 2016; 6(2): 85104.
47. Sageman, M. Understanding terror networks. Foreign Policy Research Institute. httpp://www.fpri.org/enotes/20041101.middleeast.sageman.understandingterrornetwarks.html. 2004.
48. McGilloway, A, Ghosh, P, Bhui, K. A systematic review of pathways to and processes associated with radicalization and extremism amongst Muslims in Western societies. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015; 27(1):3950.
49. Möller-Leimkühler, AM, Bogerts, B. Kollektive Gewalt. Neurobiologische, psychosoziale und gesellschaftliche Bedingungen. Nervenarzt. 2013; 84(11): 13451358.
50. Tajfel, H, Turner, J. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Hogg MA, Abrams D, eds. Intergroup Relations. New York: Psychology Press; 2001: 94109.
51. Tajfel, H. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American. 1970; 223: 96102.
52. Swann, WB, Jetten, J, Gómez, A, Whitehouse, H. When group membership gets personal: a theory of identity fusion. Psychol. Rev. 2012; 119(3): 441456.
53. Swann, WB, Buhrmester, MD. Identity fusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2015; 24(1): 5257.
54. Atran, S, Henrich, J. The evolution of religion: how cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory. 2010; 5(1): 1830.
55. Atran, S. The devoted actor: unconditional commitment and intractable conflict across cultures. Current Anthropology. 2016; 57(13): S192S203.
56. Abrahms, M. What terrorists really want. International Security. 2008; 32(4): 78105.
57. Marneros, A. Hitlers Urenkel. Rechtsradikale Gewalttäter. Bern, Switzerland: Scherz; 2002.
58. Simi, P, Windisch, S, Sporer, K. Recruitment and Radicalization Among US Far Right Terrorists. College Park, MD: START; 2016.
59. Sitzer, P, Heitmeyer, W. Right-wing extremist violence among adolescents in Germany. New Dir Youth Dev. 2008; 2008(119): 169185.
60. Pantucci, R, Ellis, C, Chaplais, L. Lone-Actor Terrorism: Literature Review. The Royal United Services Institute for Defense and Security Studies. London, UK: Stephen Austin and Sons; 2015.
61. Weimann, G. Lone wolves in cyberspace. Journal of Terrorism Research. 2012; 3(2): 7590.
62. Gill, P, Horgan, J, Deckert, P. Bombing alone: tracing the motivations and antecedent behaviors of lone-actor terrorists. J Forensic Sci. 2014; 59(2): 425435.
63. McCauley, C, Moskalenko, S, Van Son, B. Characteristics of lone-wolf violent offenders: a comparison of assassins and school attackers. Perspectives on Terrorism. 2013; 7(1): 424.
64. Hamm, M, Spaaj, R. Lone wolf terrorism in America: using knowledge of radicalization pathways to forge prevention strategies. Final Report. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/248691. 2015.
65. Gill, P. Lone-Actor Terrorists: A Behavioural Analysis. London: Routledge; 2015.
66. Borum, R. Informing lone-offender investigations. Criminology & Public Policy. 2013; 12(1): 103112.
67. Corner, E, Gill, P. A false dichotomy? Mental illness and lone-actor terrorism. Law Hum Behav. 2015; 39(1): 2334.
68. Gruenewald, J, Chermak, S, Freilich, JD. Distinguishing “loner” attacks from other domestic extremist violence. Criminology & Public Policy. 2013; 12(1): 6591.
69. Langman, P. Amok im Kopf. Warum Schüler töten. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz; 2009.
70. Böckler, N, Hoffmann, J, Zick, A. The Frankfurt Airport attack: a case study on the radicalization of a lone-actor terrorist. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management. 2015; 2(3–4): 153163.
71. Theweleit, K. Das Lachen der Täter. Breivik u.a. St. Pölten – Salzburg-Wien: Residenz Verlag; 2. Auflage; 2015.
73. Forsythe, P. Profiling ideology the best way to combat terrorism. http://thebattleoftours.blogspot.de/2016/04/profiling-ideology-best-way-to-combat.html. April 11, 2016.
74. Goldhagen DJ. The humiliation myth. Democracy Journal. http://democracyjournal.org/magazine/4/the-humiliation-myth/. 2007.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

CNS Spectrums
  • ISSN: 1092-8529
  • EISSN: 2165-6509
  • URL: /core/journals/cns-spectrums
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed