Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Phatic Rituals of the Liberal Democratic Polity: Hearing Voices in the Hearings of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples

  • James Slotta (a1)

The truth and reconciliation commissions of Latin America and Africa are paradigms of transitional justice, often regarded as part of the process of transitioning from authoritarian to democratic rule. But truth commissions are also common in first-world settler states, which raises the question of what “transition” such commissions effectuate in Canada, Australia, and the United States. This paper examines the efforts of Canada's Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples to resolve a controversy over a government relocation of Inuit families in the 1950s for which the relocatees were demanding compensation. Concurrent with historical controversies in the Canadian courts concerning Aboriginal rights and title, the historical controversy over the relocation raised questions about the Canadian state's ability to “hear the voices” of First Nations people, who objected that their accounts of the past had been disregarded by government-contracted historians and courts alike. I argue that the Royal Commission's efforts to hear the voices of Inuit relocatees, showcased in nationally televised hearings, was a phatic ritual in which communicative contact between marginalized citizens and the state was ritually established. The ritual was presented as a remedy for failures to achieve phatic communion among citizens and state—a condition of communicative contact held up as essential to the realization of liberal democratic ideals. The work of the Royal Commission and other truth commissions highlights the growing prominence of communication, particularly liberal communicative events construed as “open,” “equal,” and “free,” as a concern of both theory and practice in liberal democratic polities.

Corresponding author;
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Bauman and J. Sherzer . 1989. Introduction. In R. Bauman and J. Sherzer , eds., Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. 2d ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 617.

A. Gutmann and D. Thompson . 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

D. Posel 2008. History as Confession: The Case of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Public Culture 20, 1: 119–41.

E. A. Povinelli 2002. The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

L. M. Sanders 1997. Against Deliberation. Political Theory 25, 3: 347–76.

K. Schaffer and S. Smith . 2004. Human Rights and Narrated Lives: The Ethics of Recognition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

C. Taylor 1992. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

J. Tully 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

J. Tully 2002. The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparisons to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy. Modern Law Review 65, 2: 204–28.

R. A Wilson . 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
  • ISSN: 0010-4175
  • EISSN: 1475-2999
  • URL: /core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 10 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 72 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.