Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Imperial but Not Colonial: Archival Truths, British India, and the Case of the “Naughty” Tibetans

  • Carole McGranahan (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

What truths are available in imperial archives for non-colonial subjects? Tibet was never colonized by the British, and yet was drawn into the British imperial domain in ways that impacted both political history and historiography. In the 1940s, Tibetan intellectual Rapga Pangdatsang based his Tibetan Improvement Party in Kalimpong, India where he soon ran afoul of colonial officials who thought he was a Chinese spy. By drawing on multiple archival, ethnographic, and historic sources, I show how the story of Rapga Pangdatsang and the first Tibetan political party enables a recalibrating of both Tibetan and British imperial history. It also opens up a consideration of empire beyond the colonial, and speaks more broadly to a consideration of the non-colonial as a thus-far overlooked aspect of empire.

Copyright
Corresponding author
carole.mcgranahan@colorado.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Shompa Lahiri , “Performing Identities: Colonial Migrants, Passing and Mimicry between the Wars,” Cultural Geographies 10 (2003): 408–23

Ann Laura Stoler , “Colonial Archives and the Arts of Governance,” Archival Science 2 (2002): 87109

Archival Dis-Ease: Thinking Through Colonial Ontologies,” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 7, 2 (2010): 215–19

Nicholas B. Dirks , “Annals of the Archive: Ethnographic Notes on the Sources of History,” in Brian Axel , ed., From the Margins: Historical Anthropology and Its Futures (Durham: Duke University Press 2002), 4765

John Gallagher and Ronald Robinson , “The Imperialism of Free Trade,” Economic History Review 6, 1 (1953): 115

Patrick Wolfe , “History and Imperialism: A Century of Theory, from Marx to Postcolonialism,” American Historical Review 102, 2 (1997): 388420, 401

Fernando Coronil , “Latin American Postcolonial Studies and Global Decolonization,” in Neil Lazarus , ed., The Cambridge Companion to Postcolonial Literary Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 221–40, 226

Antoinette Burton , ed., After the Imperial Turn: Thinking with and through the Nation (Durham: Duke University Press, 2003)

Journal of the American Academy of Religion 69, 1 (2001): 163201

Sarah Abrevaya Stein , “Protected Persons? The Baghdadi Jewish Diaspora, the British State, and the Persistence of Empire,” American Historical Review 116, 1 (2011): 80108

Sukanya Banerjee , Becoming Imperial Citizens: Indians in the Late-Victorian Empire (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010)

Aihwa Ong , Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality (Durham: Duke University Press, 1999)

Ann Laura Stoler , “Rethinking Colonial Categories: European Communities and the Boundaries of Rule,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 31, 3 (1989): 134–61

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
  • ISSN: 0010-4175
  • EISSN: 1475-2999
  • URL: /core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 166 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 519 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 25th January 2017 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.