Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Abulof, Uriel 2015. ‘The people want(s) to bring down the regime’: (positive) nationalism as the Arab Spring's revolution. Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 658.


    Piliavsky, Anastasia 2015. The “Criminal Tribe” in India before the British. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 57, Issue. 02, p. 323.


    Slate, Nico 2014. The Prism of Race.


    Burke, Peter and Lowenthal, David 2011. The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Human Geography.


    Vaidik, Aparna 2010. Imperial Andamans.


    Miles, M. 2002. Disability in an Eastern Religious Context. Journal of Religion, Disability & Health, Vol. 6, Issue. 2-3, p. 53.


    ×
  • Comparative Studies in Society and History, Volume 13, Issue 4
  • October 1971, pp. 408-436

The Image of the Barbarian in Early India

  • Romila Thapar (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500006393
  • Published online: 01 June 2009
Abstract

The concept of the barbarian in early India arises out of the curious situation of the arrival of Indo-Aryan-speaking nomadic pastoralists in northern India who came into contact with the indigenous population (possibly the remnants of the urban civilization of the Indus) and regarded them as barbarians. The earliest distinction made by the Aryan speakers was a linguistic distinction and, to a smaller extent, a physical distinction. The Indo-Aryan speakers spoke Sanskrit whereas the indigenous peoples probably spoke Dravidian and Munda. However the distinction was not one of binary opposition—in fact it admitted to many nuances and degrees of variation, hence the complication of trying to trace the history of the concept. The distinction was rarely clearly manifest and based either on language, ethnic origins or culture. Political status, ritual status and economic power, all tended to blur the contours of the distinction. Added to this has been the confusion introduced by those who tend to identify language with race and who thereby see all speakers of Sanskrit as members of that nineteenth-century myth, the Aryan race.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
  • ISSN: 0010-4175
  • EISSN: 1475-2999
  • URL: /core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×