Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:17:32.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Were There ‘Bystanders’ in Topol'čany? On Concept Formation and the ‘Ladder of Abstraction’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2018

HANA KUBÁTOVÁ  and
MICHAL KUBÁT
HANA KUBÁTOVÁ
Affiliation:
Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Studies, U Kříže 8, 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic; hana.kubatova@fsv.cuni.cz
MICHAL KUBÁT
Affiliation:
Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of International Studies, U Kříže 8, 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic; michal.kubat@fsv.cuni.cz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article adds to an on-going conceptual discussion on the usefulness of the ‘bystander’ term when applied to the Holocaust and its aftermath. This catch-all concept, mostly associated with Raul Hilberg, has been the subject of fierce criticism, leading some to apply it only with adjectives (‘innocent’, ‘active’ or ‘passive’) and others to dismiss the concept altogether. Taking the Jewish–Gentile relations in Topoľčany as a case study, it becomes clear that the concept has many shortcomings when applied to the microcosm of a particular event. On the basis of Giovanni Sartori's writings on concept formation and the ‘ladder of abstraction’, we argue against dismissing the concept altogether in exchange for limiting its degree of applicability. As shown, the ‘bystander’ concept can be useful when approached with discipline and while being aware of the level of its generalisation.

Type
Article
Information
Contemporary European History , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , November 2018 , pp. 562 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank Vít Hloušek, Ota Konrád, Raz Segal and the three anonymous reviewers for their critical comments to earlier versions of the manuscript.

Research leading to this article has received funding from the Charles University under the PRIMUS programme (PRIMUS/HUM/12) and has been supported by the Charles University Research Centre No. 9.

References

1 Roth, John K., The Failures of Ethics: Confronting the Holocaust, Genocide, and Other Mass Atrocities (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Cesarani, David and Levine, Paul A., eds., Bystanders to the Holocaust: A Re-Evaluation (New York: Routledge, 2014), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Kushner, Tony, ‘“Pissing in the Wind”? The Search for Nuance in the Study of Holocaust “Bystanders”,’ The Journal of Holocaust Education 9, 2 (2000), 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Roth, The Failures of Ethics, 12; Levine, Paul A., ‘On-Lookers’, in Hayes, Peter and Roth, John K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Holocaust Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 156Google Scholar.

5 Büchler, Yehoshua Robert, The Story and Source of the Jewish Community of Topoltchany (Israel: Committee for Commemorating the Jewish Community for Topoltchany and Vicinity, 1976), 6Google Scholar.

6 For one of the most recent contributions, see Bajohr, Frank and Löw, Andrea, eds., The Holocaust and European Societies: Social Processes and Social Dynamics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Hilberg, Raul, Perpetrators, Victims, Bystanders: The Jewish Catastrophe, 1933–1945 (New York: Aaron Asher Books, 1992), xiGoogle Scholar.

8 Marrus, Michael R., The Holocaust in History (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987)Google Scholar.

9 Marrus, Michael R., The Holocaust in History (Toronto: Key Porter Books, 2002), 156Google Scholar.

10 Ibid; Wyman, David S., The Abandonment of the Jews: America and the Holocaust, 1941–1945 (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984)Google Scholar; Penkower, Monty Noam, The Jews Were Expendable: Free World Diplomacy and the Holocaust (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1983)Google Scholar.

11 Cesarani, David and Levine, Paul A., eds., ‘Introduction’, in Bystanders to the Holocaust: A Re-Evaluation (London; New York: Routledge, 2014), 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Hilberg, Perpetrators, Victims, Bystanders, 195–268.

13 Marrus, The Holocaust in History, 157.

14 Hilberg, Perpetrators, Victims, Bystanders, 212.

15 Lipstadt, Deborah, ‘The Failure to Rescue and Contemporary American Jewish Historiography of the Holocaust: Judging From a Distance’, in Neufeld, Michael J. and Berenbaum, Michael, eds., The Bombing of Auschwitz: Should the Allies Have Attempted It? (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000), 228Google Scholar.

16 Barnett, Victoria, ‘Reflections on the Concept of ‘Bystander’, in Edgren, Henrik, ed., Looking at the Onlookers and Bystanders: Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Causes and Consequences of Passivity (Stockholm: Forum för levande historia = Living history forum, 2012), 36Google Scholar; Barnett, Victoria, Bystanders: Conscience and Complicity During the Holocaust (Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2000)Google Scholar.

17 For an English-language summary of the Dutch Historikerstreit, see Morina, Christina, ‘The ‘Bystander’ in Recent Dutch Historiography’, German History 32, 1 (2014), 101–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Morina is responding here to the publication of Bart van der Boom's book – which in English would be called ‘We know nothing of their fate’: Ordinary Dutchmen and the Holocaust – that rests on a rather narrow definition of ‘knowing’. See Morina, ‘The ‘Bystander’ in Recent Dutch Historiography’, 103–4; van der Boom, Bart, ‘Wij weten niets van hun lot’: Gewone Nederlanders en de Holocaust (Amsterdam: Boom, 2012)Google Scholar.

18 Cesarani and Levine, Bystanders to the Holocaust; Bloxham, Donald and Kushner, Tony, The Holocaust: Critical Historical Approaches (Manchester, U.K.; New York, NY: Manchester University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

19 Fulbrook, Mary, A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 9Google Scholar.

20 Levine, ‘On-Lookers’, 158.

21 See note 1 in Ehrenreich, Robert M. and Cole, Tim, ‘The Perpetrator-Bystander-Victim Constellation: Rethinking Genocidal Relationships’, Human Organization 64, 3 (2005), 224CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Ehrenreich and Cole, ‘The Perpetrator-Bystander-Victim Constellation: Rethinking Genocidal Relationships’, 217.

23 Bartov, Omer, ed., The Holocaust: Origins, Implementation, Aftermath (London; New York: Routledge, 2000), 204Google Scholar.

24 Bartov, Omer, ‘Wartime Lies and Other Testimonies: Jewish-Christian Relations in Buczacz, 1939–1944’, East European Politics and Societies 25, 3 (2011), 491–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Ibid., 491.

26 Gross, Jan Tomasz, Neighbors: The Destruction of the Jewish Community in Jedwabne, Poland (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001), 12Google Scholar.

27 Aleksiun, Natalia, ‘Intimate Violence: Jewish Testimonies on Victims and Perpetrators in Eastern Galicia’, Holocaust Studies: A Journal of Culture and History 23, 1–2 (2017), 17–33Google Scholar.

28 Grabowski, Jan, Hunt for the Jews: Betrayal and Murder in German-Occupied Poland (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013), 1Google Scholar.

29 Aleksiun, Natalia, ‘Neighbours in Borysław. Jewish Perceptions of Collaboration and Rescue in Eastern Galicia’, in Bajohr, Frank and Löw, Andrea, eds., The Holocaust and European Societies: Social Processes and Social Dynamics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), 244Google Scholar; Grabowski, Hunt for the Jews, 5.

30 Sartori, Giovanni, ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’, The American Political Science Review 64, 4 (1970), 1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Collier, David and Gerring, John, ‘Introduction’, in Collier, David and Gerring, John, eds., Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori (New York: Routledge, 2009), 3Google Scholar.

32 For more on the construction of ‘good’ concepts see also Gerring, John, ‘What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences’, Polity 31, 3 (1999), 357–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Sartori, Giovanni, ed., ‘Guidelines for Concept Analysis’, in Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1984), 15Google Scholar.

34 Ibid, 15–16.

35 Sartori, Giovanni, ‘The Tower of Babel’, in Collier, David and Gerring, John, eds., Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori (New York: Routledge, 2009), 67Google Scholar.

36 Sartori, Giovanni, ‘Comparing and Miscomparing’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 3, 3 (1991), 243–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Ibid, 247.

38 Sartori, ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’, 1043.

39 Pasquino, Gianfranco, ‘Giovanni Sartori: Democracy, Parties, Institutions’, in Campus, Donatella and Pasquino, Gianfranco, eds., Masters of Political Science (Colchester, U.K.: ECPR Press, 2009), 169Google Scholar; Sartori, ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’, 1051.

40 See, for example, the conference on Probing the Limits of Categorization: The ‘Bystander’ in Holocaust History that took place in Amsterdam, Holland, 24–6 Sept. 2015.

41 Sartori, ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’.

42 Mair, Peter, ‘Concepts and Concept Formation’, in van Biezen, Ingrid, ed., On Parties, Party Systems and Democracy: Selected Writings of Peter Mair (Colchester, U.K.: ECPR Press, 2014), 79Google Scholar.

43 Ibid., 81–2.

44 Sartori, ‘The Tower of Babel’, 72.

45 There is now wealth of literature that prove the importance of microhistorical approaches to the Holocaust. For a recent edited volume on microhistories of the Holocaust across Europe, see, for example, Zalc, Claire and Bruttmann, Tal, eds., Microhistories of the Holocaust (New York: Berghahn Books, 2016)Google Scholar.

46 Nižňanský, Eduard, ‘Typológia vzťahov majoritného obyvateľstva a židovskej minority v období holokaustu’, in Šutaj, Štefan, ed., Národnostná politika na Slovensku po roku 1989 (Prešov: Universum, 2005), 192Google Scholar.

47 Nižňanský, Eduard, ‘On Relations between the Slovak Majority and Jewish Minority during World War II’, Yad Vashem Studies 42, 2 (2014), 47–8Google Scholar.

48 Nižňanský, Eduard and Hlavinka, Ján, eds., Arizácie (Bratislava: Stimul, 2010)Google Scholar; Nižňanský, Eduard and Hlavinka, Ján, eds., Arizácie v regiónoch Slovenska (Bratislava: Stimul, 2010)Google Scholar; Ján Hlavinka, ‘Arizácia židovských podnikov v Šarišsko-zemplínskej župe 1939–1945’, unpublished PhD thesis, Comenius University in Bratislava, 2013.

49 Stevenson, Angus, ed., Oxford Dictionary of English (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 240Google Scholar.

50 Dean, Martin, Robbing the Jews: The Confiscation of Jewish Property in the Holocaust, 1933–1945 (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 318Google Scholar; Tönsmeyer, Tatjana, ‘The Robbery of Jewish Property in Eastern European States Allied with Nazi Germany’, in Dean, Martin, Goschler, Constantin and Ther, Philipp, eds., Robbery and Restitution: The Conflict Over Jewish Property in Europe (Oxford; New York: Berghahn Books, 2007), 81–96Google Scholar.

51 Nižňanský, ‘On Relations between the Slovak Majority and Jewish Minority during World War II’, 88. Recent scholarship, relying on newly acquired eyewitness accounts, has questioned the ‘stereotype of ignorance’ in wartime Slovakia. See, for example, Vrzgulová, Monika, ‘Memories of the Holocaust: Slovak Bystanders’, in Kubátová, Hana and Láníček, Jan, eds., Jews and Gentiles in Central and Eastern Europe during the Holocaust. History and Memory (Abingdon: Routledge, 2018), 104Google Scholar.

52 Nižňanský, Eduard, Holokaust na Slovensku 7. Vzťah slovenskej majority a židovskej minority (náčrt problému) (Bratislava: Nadácia Milana Šimečku – Katedra všeobecných dejín FF UK, 2005)Google Scholar.

53 Paulovicova, Nina, ‘Eduard Niznansky. Holokaust na Slovensku 7. Vztah slovenskej majority a zidovskej minority. (nacrt problemu). Bratislava: Nadacia Milana Simecku, 2005’, Past Imperfect 13 (2007), 179Google Scholar.

54 Spector, Shmuel and Wigoder, Geoffrey, The Encyclopedia of Jewish Life Before and During the Holocaust: Seredina-Buda-Z (New York: NYU Press, 2001), 1314Google Scholar.

55 Büchler, Yehoshua Robert, Židovská náboženská obec v Topoľčanoch: počiatky, rozvoj, zánik (Bratislava: Slovenské národné múzeum – Múzeum židovskej kultúry, 1996), 9Google Scholar.

56 Jelinek, Yeshayahu, ‘Topolcany’, in Berenbaum, Michael and Skolnik, Fred, eds., Encyclopaedia Judaica, vol. 20 (Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2007), 38–9Google Scholar.

57 Büchler, Yehoshua Robert, Topolčany: The Story of a Perished Ancient Community (Givat Haviva: Yad Yaari, 1995), 6Google Scholar.

58 Ibid., 10.

59 Katz, Jacob, A House Divided: Orthodoxy and Schism in Nineteenth-Century Central European Jewry (Hanover, NH: University Press, 1998)Google Scholar.

60 Büchler, The Story and Source of the Jewish Community of Topoltchany, 34.

61 Büchler, Topolčany, 7.

62 For more on the places of worship in Topoľčany see Bárkány, Eugen and Dojč, Ľudovít, Židovské náboženské obce na Slovensku (Bratislava: Vesna, 1991), 206–9Google Scholar.

63 Büchler, The Story and Source of the Jewish Community of Topoltchany, 25.

64 See, for example, the testimony of Aladar Weiss, 10 Feb. 1963, Record Group (RG) O.3 – Testimonies Department of the Yad Vashem Archives, File Number (f. n) 2361, Yad Vashem Archives (YVA); oral history interview with Susan Eisdorfer Beer, RG 50.030.0326, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum oral history collection, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

65 Büchler, Yehoshua Robert, ‘Reconstruction Efforts in Hostile Surroundings – Slovaks and Jews after World War II’, in Bankier, David, ed., The Jews Are Coming Back: The Return of the Jews to Their Countries of Origin after WWII (New York; Jerusalem: Berghahn Books; Yad Vashem, 2005), 264Google Scholar.

66 Büchler, Topolčany, 11.

67 Testimony of Aladar Weiss, 10. Feb. 1963, RG O.3, f. n. 2361, YVA.

68 L. Steinberg, Interview 49918. Segment 9. Visual History Archive. USC Shoah Foundation Institute. Web. 5 Sept. 2015.

69 See Kubátová, Hana, Nepokradeš! Nálady a postoje slovenské společnosti k židovské otázce, 1938–1945 (Praha: Academia, 2013)Google Scholar.

70 Jelinek, ‘Topolcany’; Büchler, ‘Reconstruction Efforts in Hostile Surroundings – Slovaks and Jews after World War II’, 264.

71 Büchler, ‘Reconstruction Efforts in Hostile Surroundings – Slovaks and Jews after World War II’, 265.

72 Büchler, Topolčany, 20.

73 Kamenec, Ivan, ‘Protižidovský pogrom v Topoľčanoch v septembri 1945’, in Jindřich Pecka, ed., Acta contemporanea. K pětašedesátinám Viléma Prečana (Praha: Ústav pro soudobé dějiny AV ČR, 1998), 80–94Google Scholar; Kamenec, Ivan, ‘Protižidovský pogrom v Topoľčanoch v septembri 1945’, Studia Historica Nitriensia 8 (1999), 85–97Google Scholar; Šišjaková, Jana, ‘Židovská rodina v konfrontácii s povojnovou situáciou a antisemitizmom na Slovensku (1945–1948)’, Forum Historiae 3, 1 (2009)Google Scholar, http://www.forumhistoriae.sk/FH1_2009/texty_1_2009/sisjakova.pdf (last visited 14 Mar. 2018). For a more general overview of post-war anti-Jewish violence in Slovakia, see also Kubátová, Hana, ‘Teraz alebo nikdy: Povojnové protižidovské násilie a väčšinová spoločnosť na Slovensku’, Soudobé dějiny 3 (2016), 321–346Google Scholar.

74 Bednařík, Petr, ‘Zpravodajství českého tisku v roce 1945 o topoľčanském pogromu’, in Hájek, Jan, Kocian, Jiří and Zítko, Milan, eds., Fragmenty dějin: sborník prací k šedesátinám Jana Gebharta (Praha: Historický ústav AV ČR ve spolupráci s Ústavem soudobých dějin AV ČR, 2006), 443–60Google Scholar; Bumová, Ivica, ‘Obraz židov v dobovej tlači v rokoch 1945–1948: denníky Čas a Pravda’, in Vrzgulová, Monika and Kubátová, Hana, eds., Podoby antisemitismu v Čechách a na Slovensku ve 20. a 21. století (Praha: Karolinum, 2016), 97–118Google Scholar.

75 Láníček, Jan, Czechs, Slovaks and the Jews, 1938–48: Beyond Idealization and Condemnation (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013), 165–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76 Hudec, Dušan, Miluj blížneho svojho: protižidovský pogrom v Topoľčanoch v septembri 1945 (Dimas Digital Master Studio, 2008)Google Scholar.

77 Kubátová, Hana, ‘On the Image of the Jew in Postwar Slovakia’, The Annual of Language & Politics and Politics of Identity IX (2015), 71–85Google Scholar.

78 Ibid., 85.

79 Report compiled by the Second Department of the Headquarters of National Security concerning anti-Jewish demonstrations in Topoľčany, 2 Oct. 1945, RG Povereníctvo vnútra, prezídium, f. n. 2087/46, Box (b.) 2, Slovak National Archive (SNA).

80 Ibid.

81 Results of investigation by the Heath Commission, 1 Oct. 1945, RG Povereníctvo vnútra, prezídium, f. n. 2087/46, b. 2, SNA. During the subsequent deliberations of the government that took place a week after the pogrom, Deputy Prime Minister Viliam Široký claimed that Karol Berger made an unfortunate comment to one of the mothers whose child was about to receive a vaccination, allegedly saying that it will not ‘help this child as it will die anyhow because of malnutrition’. Government session of 2 Oct. 1945, Archiv Ústavu dějin KSČ, RG 83, sign. no. 48, National Archives in Prague.

82 Transcribed telephone report of Rudolf Viktorín on situation in Topoľčany, 25 Sept. 1945, RG Povereníctvo vnútra, prezídium, f. n. 2087/46, b. 2, SNA.

83 Situational report addressed to the Headquarters of National Security, 28 Sept. 1945, RG Povereníctvo vnútra, prezídium, f. n. 2087/46, b. 2, SNA.

84 Kubátová, Nepokradeš!, 178–231.

85 Testimony of Ernst Kohn and Ondrej Weiss regarding riots in Topoľčany and its vicinity on 24 Sept. 1945, submitted in the context of the Dokumentační akce (documentation project) in Prague, 4 Oct. 1945, RG O.7 Collection on the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, f. n. 260, YVA.

86 Wein, Martin Joachim, A History of Czechs and Jews: A Slavic Jerusalem (New York: Routledge, 2015), 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

87 Cichopek-Gajraj, Anna, Beyond Violence: Jewish Survivors in Poland and Slovakia, 1944–48 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

88 Hallon, Ľudovít, ‘Arizácia na Slovensku 1939–1945’, Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 7 (2007), 148–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89 Andrea James, ‘Zmeny v postavení židovskej komunity v okrese Topoľčany počas obdobia Slovenského štátu’, Česko-slovenská historická ročenka (2001), 129.

90 On the evaluation of public auctions in non-Jewish witness accounts of the Holocaust in Slovakia, see Vrzgulová, ‘Memories of the Holocaust’, 105.

91 See the manifold wartime situational reports from Topoľčany, RG Ústredňa štátnej bezpečnosti, 209-763-6, SNA.

92 Intelligence report n. 9, 12 Aug. 1946, RG Úrad predsedníctva Slovenskej národnej rady, f. n. 287/46, b. 269, SNA.

93 Hudec, Miluj blížneho svojho: protižidovský pogrom v Topoľčanoch v septembri 1945; Bartová, Barbora, ‘The Memory of Topoľčany: The Relationship of the Jewish Inhabitants of Topoľčany after the Tragedy of the “Topoľčany Pogrom”,’ Journal of Modern Jewish Studies 15, 3 (2016), 520–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94 Novák, Miroslav, ‘Postkomunistická nebo standardní? Naše demokracie 15 let poté’, in Mrklas, Ladislav, ed., 15 let poté: sborník k patnáctému výročí pádu komunismu v zemích střední a východní Evropy (Praha: CEVRO, 2005), 35Google Scholar.

95 Complaint about Oskár Hecht, 26 Sept. 1941, RG Okresný úrad Topoľčany – prezidiálne spisy 1941, f. n. 1244/41, b. 113, State Archive in Nitra – Topoľčany branch.

96 Interview with Tereza Wiesnerová, 3 July 2015, Príbehy 20. storočia, Post Bellum SK, http://www.pametnaroda.cz/story/wiesnerova-tereza-1928-3542 (last visited 14 Mar. 2018).