Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-8d5sf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-14T09:58:15.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metaphors and Paradigms of the LanguageAnimal—or—The Advantage of seeing “Time Is aResource” as a Paradigm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

GESCHE KEDING
GESCHE KEDING*
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena
*
*<gesche.keding@uni-jena.de>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the features of an encompassing account of language that Charles Taylorexamines in Chapter Five, “The Figuring Dimension ofLanguage,” of The Language Animal is a special kindof metaphor, which is rooted in the embodiment of humans. Theirperspective-taking, their intuition of position in space, etc., provide‘structural templates’ for thinking and leave their tracesin their expressions. Taylor compares these metaphors with paradigms. My paperdiscusses the differences between the two. Taylor’s example‘Time Is a Resource’ is understood more deeply if seen asa paradigm, i.e., a set of beliefs and practices, instead of as a‘structural template,’ i.e., rooted in embodiment.

L’une des possibilités de «la dimensionfigurative du langage» que Charles Taylor examine au chapitre 5 deThe Language Animal est un type particulier demétaphore ancré dans le corps humain. La perspective queles humains adoptent ou, par exemple, l’intuition de leur positiondans l’espace fournissent des modèles structurels pourpenser et laissent des traces dans nos expressions. Taylor compare cesmétaphores à des paradigmes. Dans cet article, je traitedes différences entre les deux. L’exemple du«temps comme ressource» mis en évidence parTaylor, ainsi que ses implications, sont mieux compris s’ils sontenvisagés comme paradigme, c’est-à-dire commeun ensemble de croyances et de pratiques plutôt que comme unmodèle structurel ancré de façon durable dansdes corps.

Keywords

embodimentmetaphorstructural templatefiguring elements of languageparadigmtimeCharles Taylor

Information

Type
Special Issue: Charles Taylor’s The LanguageAnimal
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 693 - 704
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cavell, Stanley 2010 Little Did I know. Excerpts from Memory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan 2013 Language and Time. A Cognitive Linguistics Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, Joseph 1997 Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Stress. Berkeley: University of California, Dissertation.Google Scholar
Keding, Gesche 2016 “Time Norms as Strong Evaluations—A Step Towards a Critique of Time Norms.” Constellations 23 (3): 448–458.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 2009 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark 1999 Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark 2003 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas 1971 “Die Knappheit der Zeit und die Vordringlichkeit des Befristeten.” In: Luhmann, Niklas (ed.), Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niebert, Kai 2010 Den Klimawandel Verstehen. Eine Didaktische Rekonstruktion der Globalen Erwärmung. Oldenburg: Didaktisches Zentrum.Google Scholar
Postone, Moishe 2003 Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, Hartmut 1995 “Paradigma und Wertbeziehung.” Logos. Zeitschrift für Systematische Philosophie 2 (1): 59–94.Google Scholar
Rosa, Hartmut 2013 Social Acceleration. A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1979 “The Validity of Transcendental Arguments.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79: 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1989 “Explanation and Practical Reason.” In: Wider Working Paper WP72. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1995 “Lichtung or Lebensform. Parallels between Heidegger and Wittgenstein.” In: Taylor, Charles, Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 61–78.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 2016 The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Edward Palmer 1967 “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism.” Past & Present 38: 56–97.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1980 “Paradigms and Political Theories.” In: Gutting, Gary (ed.), Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 160–191.Google Scholar