Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Descartes' Legacy and Deep Ecology

  • Peter Miller (a1)

When the history of philosophy is painted in broad strokes, the philosophy of Descartes is generally regarded as the major watershed between classical and modern outlooks. Although Descartes himself was more concerned with epistemology and metaphysics than with axiology, his successors have generally drawn as an axiological corollary of his metaphysical bifurcation of reality the thesis that all final or intrinsic values, if they exist at all, exist only in the domain of conscious subjects, or at the very least as relata dependent upon such subjects. These subjects may indeed extend beyond humankind to include gods or beasts or even, according to the speculative flights of some, the “occasions of experience” of Whiteheadian panpsychists or the universal mind of the idealists. The common denominator of all these accounts, however, is that values essentially depend upon human or quasi-human entities, i.e., conscious, experiencing subjects. This post-Cartesian thesis is in marked contrast to the axiological realism of the classical world of Plato and Aristotle, which concurs with large segments of common sense in finding objects to exist with their axiological properties independently of human and similar subjects. The Cartesian legacy in axiology has been to encourage the exploration of human values and experiences of value while creating a moratorium on the investigation of subject-independent values.

Hide All
Arne Naess , “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement: A Summary”, Inquiry 16 (1973), 95100

Holmes Rolston IIIIs There an Ecological Ethic?”, Ethics 85 (1975), 93109

Bryan G. Norton 's, “Ennvironmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism”, Environmental Ethics 6 (1984), 131148

Mark Sagoff 's, “On Preserving the Natural Environment”, The Yale Law Journal 84 (1974), 245267

J. B. Callicott , “Intrinsic Value, Quantum Theory, and Environmental Ethics”, Environmental Ethics 7 (1985), 262

J. L. Mackie 's Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1977)

Ernest Partridge , “Nature as a Moral Resource”, Environmental Ethics 6 (1984), 109113

Tom Regan in “The Nature and Possibility of an Environmental Ethic”, Environmental Ethics 3 (1981), 1934.

Kenneth Goodpaster , “On Being Morally Considerable”, The Journal of Philosophy 75 (1978), 308325

Value as Richness: Toward a Value Theory for an Expanded Naturalism in Environmental Ethics”, Environmental Ethics 4 (1982), 101114.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 83 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.