Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Explication et pertinence : du sel ensorcelé à la loi des aires

  • Cyrille Imbert (a1)

ABSTRACT: Whereas relevance in scientific explanations is usually discussed as if it was a single problem, several criteria of relevance will be distinguished in this paper. Emphasis is laid upon the notion of intra-scientific relevance, which is illustrated using explanation of the law of areas as an example. Traditional accounts of explanation, such as the causal and unificationist accounts, are analyzed against these criteria of relevance. Particularly, it will be shown that these accounts fail to indicate which explanations fulfill the condition of intra-scientific relevance. Finally, the significance of this latter criterion is emphasized, and the epistemic benefits of explanations that fulfill it are highlighted.

RÉSUMÉ : À rebours des discussions sur l’explication, qui semblent faire de la pertinence explicative un problème unique, plusieurs critères de pertinence explicative sont ici distingués. Est en particulier soulignée l’importance de la notion de pertinence intra-scientifique, qui est analysée de façon précise sur la base de l’explication de la loi des aires. Les conceptions traditionnelles de l’explication, et notamment la théorie causale ainsi que la théorie unificationiste de Kitcher, sont évaluées à l’aune de ces différentes critères. Il est en particulier montré quils ne fournissent pas d’outils suffisants pour identifier les explications qui satisfont la condition de pertinence intra-scientifique.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Robert Batterman 1998 «Why Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics Works: Universality and the Renormalization Group», Philosophy of Science, vol. 65, p. 183208.

Stuart S Glennan . 1996 «Mechanisms and the nature of causation», Erkenntnis, vol. 44, no 1, p. 4971.

Henry Kyburg 1965 «Comment», Philosophy of Science, vol. 32, p. 147151.

Peter Machamer 2004 «Activities and Causation: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Mechanisms», International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 18, p. 2739.

Peter Machamer , Lindley Darden et Carl F. Carver 2000 «Thinking About Mechanisms», Philosophy of Science, vol. 67, p. 125.

Peter Railton 1978 «A Deductive-Nomological Model of Probabilistic Explanation», Philosophy of Science, vol. 45, p. 206226.

Peter Railton 1981 «Probability, Explanation, Information», Synthese, vol. 48, p. 233256.

Wesley Salmon 1997 «Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques», Philosophy of Science, vol. 64, p. 461477.

Bas van Fraassen 1980 The Scientific Image, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

James Woodward 1979 «Scientific Explanation», British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 30, p. 4167.

James Woodward 1997 «Explanation, Invariance, and Intervention», Philosophy of Science, vol. 64 (Proceedings), p. S26S41.

James Woodward 2000 «Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences», British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 51, p. 197254.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 75 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.