Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Interpreting Russell’s Gray’s Elegy Argument

  • NICHOLAS RAY (a1)
Abstract

“On Denoting” is central to the analytic tradition, yet one of its key arguments (the Gray’s Elegy Argument) lacks a canonical reading. Some interpret the passage as rejecting denoting concepts as inconsistent, or the theory that posits them as incoherent. Such readings are too strong, and at odds with the passage. We interpret the argument as a set of considerations that leave the old view as a logically viable (though uneconomical and cumbersome) competitor to Russell’s new semantic theory.

«De la Dénotation» est l’un des articles les plus importants de la tradition analytique, pourtant il n’existe pas d’interprétation canonique pour l’un de ses argument-clés (l’argument de l’Élégie de Gray). Certains croient que le passage en question démontre que les concepts dénotants en eux-mêmes sont contradictoires; d’autres que la théorie qui les sous-tend est incohérente. Les deux interprétations sont trop fortes et sont contredites par le texte du passage. Nous l’interprétons plutôt comme un ensemble de considérations qui conservent à l’ancienne théorie, bien qu’elle soit encombrante et prolixe, la possibilité de concurrencer la nouvelle presentation sémantique de Russell.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Blackburn Simon and Code Alan 1978The Power of Russell’s Criticism of Frege.” Analysis 38, pp. 6577.
Cartwright Richard 1987On the Origins of Russell’s Theory of Descriptions.” In Cartwright R., Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 95133.
Demopoulos William 1999On the theory of meaning of ‘On denoting’.” Noûs 33:3, pp. 439458.
Geach Peter 1959Russell on Meaning and Denoting.” Analysis 19, pp. 6972.
Hylton Peter 1990 Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kremer Michael 1994The Argument of ‘On Denoting’.” The Philosophical Review, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 249297.
Makin Gideon 2000 The Metaphysicians of Meaning: Russell and Frege on Sense and Denotation. New York: Routledge.
Moore G.E. 1899The Nature of Judgment.” Mind, pp. 176193.
Noonan Harold 1996The ‘Gray’s Elegy’ Argument – And Others.” in Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Monk Ray and Palmer Anthony. Bristol, UK: Thoemmes Press, pp. 65102.
Russell Bertrand 1903 The Principles of Mathematics. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Russell Bertrand 1904Letter to Frege of 12 December 1904.” in Gottlob Frege, Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, Trans. Kaal Hans. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980, p. 169.
Russell Bertrand 1905On Denoting.” in Bertrand Russell (2005), pp. 4156.
Russell Bertrand 1912 The Problems of Philosophy. Galaxy Book reprint of the Home University Library edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Russell Bertrand 1994On Fundamentals.” in Foundations of Logic, 1903–05. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 4. New York: Routledge.
Russell Bertrand 2005 Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950. edited by Marsh Robert Charles. New York: Routledge.
Wahl Russell 1993Russell’s Theory of Meaning and Denotation and ‘On Denoting’” in Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 7194.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 88 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 236 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.