Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Intra-Family Inequality and Justice1

  • XAVIER LANDES (a1) and MORTEN EBBE JUUL NIELSEN (a2)
Abstract

In “The Pecking Order,” Dalton Conley argues that inequalities between siblings are larger than inequalities at the level of the overall society. Our article discusses the normative implications for institutions of this observation. We show that the question of state intervention for curbing intra-family inequality reveals an internal tension within liberalism between autonomy and toleration, which bears on the forms that the intervention of institutions may take. Despite the pros and cons of both commitments, autonomy-based liberalism appears more compatible with the involvement of the state for egalitarian reasons within the family than toleration-based liberalism.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Arneson Richard J. 1989Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophical Studies 56 (1): 7793.
Ariely Dan 2008 Predictably Irrational. New York: Harper Collins.
Brennan Samantha and Noggle Robert 1997The Moral Status of Children: Children’s Rights, Parents’ Rights, and Family Justice.” Social Theory and Practice 23 (1): 126.
Brighouse Harry and Swift Adam 2006Parents’ Rights and the Value of the Family.” Ethics 117 (1): 80108.
Cohen Gerald A. 1989On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99 (4): 906944.
Cohen Gerald A 1997Where the Action is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1): 330.
Conley Dalton 2004 The Pecking Order: A Bold New Look at How Family and Society Determine Who We Become. New York: Vintage Books.
De Wijze Stephen 2000The Family and Political Justice: The Case for Political Liberalisms.” The Journal of Ethics 4 (3): 257281.
Dworkin Gerald 1988 The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dworkin Ronald 1989The Liberal Community.” California Law Review 77 (3): 479504.
Dworkin Ronald 2002 Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Galston William A. 1995Two Concepts of Liberalism.” Ethics 105 (3): 516534.
Gilbert Daniel T. 2006 Stumbling on Happiness, New York: Knopf.
Gutmann Amy 1987 Democratic Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Iversen Torben, and Rosenbluth Frances 2010 Women, Work, and Politics: The Political Economy of Gender Inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Knight Carl 2009 Luck Egalitarianism: Equality, Responsibility, and Justice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Kukathas Chandran 2004 Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levy Jacob T. 2003Liberalism’s Divide After Socialism– and Before.” Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (1): 278297.
Macedo Stephen 1995Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls?Ethics 105 (3): 468496.
Mill John Stuart 1848 Principles of Political Economy: With Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. Boston: C.C. Little and J. Brown.
Okin Susan Moller 1989 Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.
Okin Susan Moller 1994Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender.” Ethics 105 (1): 2343.
Rawls John 1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Rawls John 2001 Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Sunstein Cass R. and Thaler Richard H. 2003Libertarian Paternalism is not an Oxymoron.” University of Chicago Law Review 70 (4): 11591202.
Swift Adam 2008Justice, Luck, and the Family: The Intergenerational Transmission of Economic Advantage From a Normative Perspective.” In Unequal Chances: Family Background and Economic Success, eds. Bowles Samuel, Gintis Herbert, and Groves Melissa Osborne. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 256276.
Thaler Richard H. and Sunstein Cass R. 2008 Nudge. Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tversky Amos, and Kahneman Daniel 1974Judgments Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157): 11241131.
Walzer Michael 1984 Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 6 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 124 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.