Skip to main content
×
Home

Reply to Hurka and Copp

  • L. W. Sumner (a1)
Abstract

I am deeply indebted to Tom Hurka and David Copp for the careful attention they have given to some of the central motifs in The Moral Foundation of Rights. By doing their job so well they have simplified mine considerably. Their exposition of my views is a model of fairness and accuracy; I need therefore waste no time disclaiming attributions or complaining about misrepresentation. Furthermore, they have shown admirable resolve in choosing to ignore the book's relatively peripheral concerns, even when these would have made easy targets. By adopting this policy of restraint they have helped to illuminate issues which, it seems to me, run to the very heart of moral/political theory.

Copyright
References
Hide All

1 Because Hurka thinks that the alethic modalities are reducible to the deontic, he also thinks that rights analytically require only first-order deontic ingredients. As he notes, I am agnostic on this issue. In any event, no such reduction would imperil my case against natural rights.

2 I am fussier than Hurka (and many others) about observing this trichotomy. As a result I resist the common equation of “A ought to φ” with “A has a duty to φ” or “It is obligatory of A to φ”. I also resist the idea that the basic consequentialist principle imposes a duty to maximize the good, or to promote some other goal. What consequentialism tells us directly is what it is best for us to do, or perhaps what we ought to do: duties follow from any such principle only derivatively and indirectly. If I used the concept of duty anywhere in the book in the broad sense in which there is a duty whenever a person ought to do something, this was a lapse.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 20 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.