Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Scepticism about Moral Motives

  • Anita M. Superson (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300008040
  • Published online: 01 April 2010
Abstract

Traditionally, the problem of defeating scepticism about the rationality of morality is that of showing that every morally required act is rationally required. Little or no direct attention has been paid to whether we must also show that it is rational for the agent to have and act from the morally appropriate motive, whatever that may be. This is not to say that philosophers have entirely ignored the issue of motives; a fair number—Kant and Aristotle come to mind—are concerned in part with the kind of motive agents ought to have and from which they ought to act. But the link to scepticism has not been clearly made. At issue is whether scepticism is fully defeated if we show that every morally required act is rationally required, even if we leave it possible that a fully rational person who performs the act just “goes through the motions” in doing so.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Bernard Gert , “Rationality, Human Nature, and Lists,” Ethics, 100, 2 (1991): 279300

Kavka's discussion of nuclear deterrence in his “Some Paradoxes of Deterrence,” The Journal of Philosophy, 75, 6 (June 1978): 285302;

Barbara Herman , “Rules, Motives, and Helping Actions,” Philosophical Studies, 45, 3 (May 1984): 369–77.

Marcia Baron , “On De-Kantianizing the Perfectly Moral Person,” Journal of Value Inquiry, 17 (1983): 281–93, esp. p. 285.

Annette Baier , “What Do Women Want in a Moral Theory?,” Nous, 19, 1 (March 1985): 5363, esp. p. 57.

Michael Stocker , “The Schizophrenia of Modern Moral Theories,” The Journal of Philosophy, 73, 14 (August 12, 1976): 453–66, esp. pp. 456-57.

Gilbert Harman , “Moral Relativism Defended,” The Philosophical Review, 84, 1 (January 1975): 322.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×