Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T12:03:17.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimizing Visits to the Site of Death for Bereaved Families After Disasters and Terrorist Events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2017

Pål Kristensen*
Affiliation:
Center for Crisis Psychology, Bergen, Norway Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway
Atle Dyregrov
Affiliation:
Center for Crisis Psychology, Bergen, Norway Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Lars Weisæth
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Marianne Straume
Affiliation:
Center for Crisis Psychology, Bergen, Norway
Kari Dyregrov
Affiliation:
Center for Crisis Psychology, Bergen, Norway Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bergen University College, Bergen, Norway
Trond Heir
Affiliation:
Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Renate Grønvold Bugge
Affiliation:
Center for Crisis Psychology, Bergen, Norway
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Pål Kristensen, PhD, Center for Crisis Psychology, Fortunen 7, 5013 Bergen, Norway (e-mail: Paal@krisepsyk.no)

Abstract

In recent years it has been common after disasters and terrorist events to offer bereaved families the opportunity to visit the place where their loved ones died. Many report that such visits are beneficial in processing their loss. Various factors, both cognitive (eg, counteracting disbelief) and existential or emotional (eg, achieving a sense of closeness to the deceased), are associated with the experienced benefit. Nonetheless, exacerbations of trauma and grief reactions (eg, re-enactment fantasies) are common, with some of the bereaved also reporting adverse reactions after the visit. Subsequently, proper preparations are a prerequisite before such visits take place. This article describes how to optimize collective visits to the site of death after disasters or terrorist events for bereaved families. Important questions—for example, concerning those who should be responsible for organizing a visit and those who should be invited, the timing of the visit, what can be done at the site, the need for support personnel, and other practical issues—are discussed and general guidelines are recommended. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:523–527)

Type
Concepts in Disaster Medicine
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kristensen, P, Franco, M-HP. Bereavement and disasters: research and clinical intervention. In: Neimeyer RA, Harris DL, Winokuer HR, Thornton GF, eds. Grief and Bereavement in Contemporary Society. Bridging Research and Practice. New York: Routledge; 2011:189-202.Google Scholar
2. Kristensen, P, Tønnessen, A, Weisæth, L, et al. Visiting the site of death: experiences of the bereaved after the 2004 Southeast Asia tsunami. Death Stud. 2012;36:462-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2011.553322.Google Scholar
3. Kristensen, P, Dyregrov, A, Dyregrov, K. “Det er både helt grusomt og godt på samme tid”. Etterlatte foreldre og søskens opplevelse av besøk til Utøya etter terrorangrepet 22. juli [“It is both awful and good at the same time”. Bereaved parents and siblings experiences of visiting the site of death after the July 22nd Utøya terror attack]. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening [J Norwegian Psychol Assoc]. 2015;52:487-496. (in Norwegian).Google Scholar
4. Murray, H, Merritt, C, Grey, N. Clients’ experiences of returning to the trauma site during PTSD treatment: an exploratory study. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2016;44:420-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465815000338.Google Scholar
5. Heir, T, Weisæth, L. Back to where it happened: self-reported symptom improvement of tsunami survivors who returned to the disaster area. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21:59-63.Google Scholar
6. Dyregrov, A. Children’s participation in rituals. Bereavement Care. 1996;15:2-5.Google Scholar
7. Søfting, G, Dyregrov, A, Dyregrov, K. Because I am also part of the family. Children’s participation in rituals after the loss of a parent or sibling: a qualitative study from the children’s perspective. Omega J Death Dying. 2016;73:141-158.Google Scholar
8. Johnsen, I, Dyregrov, K. “Only a friend”: the bereavement process of young adults after the loss of a close friend in an extreme terror incident—a qualitative approach. Omega J Death Dying. 2016;74:16-34.Google Scholar
9. Clark, J, Franzmann, M. Authority from grief, presence and place in the making of roadside memorials. Death Stud. 2006;30:579-599.Google Scholar
10. Johnson, E. Memorial services, site visits, and other rituals. In: Roberts, SB, Ashley, W WC, eds. Disaster Spiritual Care: Practical Clergy Responses to Community, Regional, and National Tragedy. Burlington, VT: Skylight Paths; 2008:196-208.Google Scholar
11. Murray, H, Merrit, C, Grey, N. Returning to the scene of the trauma in PTSD treatment – why, how and when? Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;8:1-12.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kristensen et al supplementary material

Kristensen et al supplementary material 1

Download Kristensen et al supplementary material(File)
File 18.9 KB